REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CCI vs WELL vs PLD vs AMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Specialty
CCI vs WELL vs PLD vs AMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $38.88B | $150.14B | $130.26B | $82.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.21B | $11.63B | $8.74B | $10.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.06B | $1.43B | $3.21B | $2.88B |
| Gross Margin | 65.7% | 39.1% | 67.7% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 48.0% | 4.4% | 47.0% | 44.2% |
| Forward P/E | 43.0x | 78.9x | 40.8x | 27.2x |
| Total Debt | $29.57B | $21.38B | $31.49B | $44.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $269M | $5.03B | $1.32B | $1.47B |
CCI vs WELL vs PLD vs AMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) | 100 | 51.8 | -48.2% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 422.9 | +322.9% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 155.2 | +55.2% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 70.8 | -29.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCI vs WELL vs PLD vs AMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 5.3%
- 5.3% yield, vs AMT's 3.8%
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- Beta 0.13, yield 1.3%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs CCI's -35.1%
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 263.8% 10Y total return vs WELL's 230.2%
- 36.7% margin vs WELL's 12.3%
AMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 3.72 vs PLD's 3.77
- Lower P/E (27.2x vs 40.8x), PEG 3.72 vs 3.77
- 4.5% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 6.9% vs 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs CCI's -35.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.2x vs 40.8x), PEG 3.72 vs 3.77 | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.7% margin vs WELL's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs PLD's 0.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, vs AMT's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs AMT's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 6.9% vs 0.5% |
CCI vs WELL vs PLD vs AMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCI vs WELL vs PLD vs AMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMT leads in 2 of 6 categories
CCI leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • PLD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 2.8x CCI's $4.2B. PLD is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WELL's 12.3%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $11.6B | $8.7B | $10.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.7B | $2.8B | $6.7B | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $1.4B | $3.2B | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.7B | $2.5B | $5.2B | $3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.7% | +39.1% | +67.7% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +4.4% | +47.0% | +44.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +12.3% | +36.7% | +26.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +64.7% | +21.9% | +59.3% | +34.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | +40.3% | +8.7% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +132.1% | +22.5% | -24.1% | +76.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AMT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.0x trailing earnings, AMT trades at a 79% valuation discount to WELL's 154.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLD offers better value at 3.24x vs AMT's 4.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38.9B | $150.1B | $130.3B | $83.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $68.2B | $166.5B | $160.4B | $126.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 87.35x | 154.17x | 34.98x | 33.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.99x | 78.89x | 40.80x | 27.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.24x | 4.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.63x | 66.76x | 22.93x | 18.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.12x | 14.08x | 15.88x | 7.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.37x | 2.28x | 8.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.52x | 52.72x | 26.52x | 21.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $3 for WELL. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs CCI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +3.5% | +5.6% | +27.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +2.3% | +3.3% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +0.5% | +3.8% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +0.6% | +4.8% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.49x | 0.54x | 4.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29.3B | $16.3B | $30.2B | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $269M | $5.0B | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29.6B | $21.4B | $31.5B | $45.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.17x | 0.26x | 5.27x | 3.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,417 for CCI. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +43.9% total return vs AMT's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 41.3% vs CCI's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.6% | +15.0% | +9.5% | +2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.7% | +43.9% | +37.1% | -17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.7% | +182.2% | +19.3% | +0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.8% | +212.6% | +39.6% | -15.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.4% | +230.2% | +263.8% | +113.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.7% | +41.3% | +6.1% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WELL and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLD's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.26x | 0.13x | 0.73x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $115.76 | $219.59 | $145.44 | $234.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $75.96 | $142.65 | $103.02 | $165.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.0% | +97.6% | +96.4% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.3 | 62.6 | 49.7 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 2.6M | 3.1M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CCI and PLD and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCI as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", PLD as "Buy", AMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for AMT (target: $216) vs 3.0% for PLD (target: $144). For income investors, CCI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.34% vs WELL's 1.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $105.40 | $226.50 | $144.43 | $216.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 34 | 42 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | +1.3% | +2.7% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.76 | $2.76 | $3.74 | $6.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.4% |
AMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CCI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CCI vs WELL vs PLD vs AMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCI or WELL or PLD or AMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 1% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the better valuation at 33. 0x trailing P/E (27. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCI or WELL or PLD or AMT?
On trailing P/E, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the cheapest at 33.
0x versus Welltower Inc. at 154. 2x. On forward P/E, American Tower Corporation is actually cheaper at 27. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Tower Corporation wins at 3. 72x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 77x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCI or WELL or PLD or AMT?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +212. 6%, compared to -35. 8% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLD returned +263. 8% versus CCI's +58. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCI or WELL or PLD or AMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Prologis, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning PLD is approximately -2050% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCI or WELL or PLD or AMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -35. 1% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crown Castle Inc. grew EPS 111. 4% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCI or WELL or PLD or AMT?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus 8. 8% for Welltower Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLD leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCI or WELL or PLD or AMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 72x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 77x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, American Tower Corporation (AMT) trades at 27. 2x forward P/E versus 78. 9x for Welltower Inc. — 51. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMT: 21. 5% to $216. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCI or WELL or PLD or AMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is CCI or WELL or PLD or AMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 8% yield, +113. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +113. 0%, PLD: +263. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCI and WELL and PLD and AMT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.