Leisure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CCL vs MAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Lodging
CCL vs MAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $34.03B | $95.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26.62B | $21.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.76B | $2.58B |
| Gross Margin | 37.4% | 6.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 31.0x |
| Total Debt | $27.99B | $17.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.93B | $358M |
CCL vs MAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carnival Corporatio… (CCL) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
| Marriott Internatio… (MAR) | 100 | 405.7 | +305.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCL vs MAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 40.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.8%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs MAR's 4.3%
- Lower P/E (12.5x vs 31.0x)
MAR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 0.7%
- 440.0% 10Y total return vs CCL's -29.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, current ratio 0.43x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs MAR's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.5x vs 31.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.9% margin vs CCL's 10.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs CCL's 2.27 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.6% vs CCL's +41.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.5% ROA vs CCL's 5.3%, ROIC 25.0% vs 8.9% |
CCL vs MAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCL vs MAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCL and MAR operate at a comparable scale, with $26.6B and $21.7B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.9% (MAR) to 10.4% (CCL). On growth, CCL holds the edge at +6.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.6B | $21.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7.3B | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.8B | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.4% | +6.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +14.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | -71.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.4% | +110.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CCL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, CCL trades at a 64% valuation discount to MAR's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCL's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MAR's 25.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $34.0B | $95.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $60.1B | $111.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.62x | 37.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.47x | 31.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.26x | 25.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.28x | 3.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.14x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.05x | 36.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +10.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +25.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.8% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.28x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $26.1B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $358M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28.0B | $17.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.09x | 8.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAR five years ago would be worth $25,790 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,663 for CCL. Over the past 12 months, MAR leads with a +43.6% total return vs CCL's +41.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCL at 37.6% vs MAR's 27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.5% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.7% | +43.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +160.8% | +105.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.6% | +157.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.4% | +440.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.6% | +27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MAR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAR is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCL's 2.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAR currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs CCL's 80.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.27x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.03 | $380.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.22 | $250.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26.9M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MAR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CCL as "Buy" and MAR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for CCL (target: $36) vs 3.7% for MAR (target: $373). MAR is the only dividend payer here at 0.74% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.17 | $372.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 47 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
MAR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CCL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CCL vs MAR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCL or MAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) is the stronger pick with 6.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCL or MAR?
On trailing P/E, Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) is the cheapest at 13.
6x versus Marriott International, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Carnival Corporation & plc is actually cheaper at 12. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCL or MAR?
Over the past 5 years, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) delivered a total return of +157. 9%, compared to +6. 6% for Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAR returned +440. 0% versus CCL's -29. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCL or MAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Carnival Corporation & plc's 2. 27β — meaning CCL is approximately 108% more volatile than MAR relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CCL or MAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) is pulling ahead at 6.
4% versus 4. 3% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carnival Corporation & plc grew EPS 40. 3% year-over-year, compared to 13. 9% for Marriott International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCL leads at 29. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCL or MAR?
Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
4% net margin versus 9. 9% for Marriott International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCL leads at 16. 8% versus 15. 8% for MAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCL leads at 29. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCL or MAR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) trades at 12.
5x forward P/E versus 31. 0x for Marriott International, Inc. — 18. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCL: 31. 4% to $36. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCL or MAR?
In this comparison, MAR (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CCL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCL or MAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 0. 7% yield, +440. 0% 10Y return). Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAR: +440. 0%, CCL: -29. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCL and MAR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CCL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MAR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MAR pays a dividend while CCL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.