Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CCOI vs IIPR vs LUMN vs REFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
Telecommunications Services
REIT - Mortgage
CCOI vs IIPR vs LUMN vs REFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | REIT - Industrial | Telecommunications Services | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $817M | $1.62B | $8.71B | $245M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $949M | $263M | $12.12B | $44M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-170M | $120M | $-1.74B | $4.87B |
| Gross Margin | 32.4% | 60.3% | 35.2% | 95.6% |
| Operating Margin | -7.9% | 46.7% | -2.6% | 18.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.2x | — | 6.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.93B | $394M | $17.71B | $98M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $48M | $1.00B | $15M |
CCOI vs IIPR vs LUMN vs REFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cogent Communicatio… (CCOI) | 100 | 22.3 | -77.7% |
| Innovative Industri… (IIPR) | 100 | 21.5 | -78.5% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 67.4 | -32.6% |
| Chicago Atlantic Re… (REFI) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCOI vs IIPR vs LUMN vs REFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCOI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IIPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and efficiency is your priority.
- 13.5% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs REFI's 100.0%
- 5.1% ROA vs CCOI's -5.4%, ROIC 4.3% vs -3.1%
LUMN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.0% vs CCOI's -65.4%
REFI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.9%
- 24.7% 10Y total return vs IIPR's 436.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 0.28x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% FFO/revenue growth vs IIPR's -13.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 109.7% margin vs CCOI's -17.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 13.5% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs REFI's 100.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.0% vs CCOI's -65.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs CCOI's -5.4%, ROIC 4.3% vs -3.1% |
CCOI vs IIPR vs LUMN vs REFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CCOI vs IIPR vs LUMN vs REFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REFI leads in 3 of 6 categories
LUMN leads 1 • CCOI leads 0 • IIPR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 273.3x REFI's $44M. REFI is the more profitable business, keeping 109.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCOI's -17.9%. On growth, CCOI holds the edge at -3.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $949M | $263M | $12.1B | $44M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $174M | $197M | $2.4B | $8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$170M | $120M | -$1.7B | $4.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$208M | $144M | $5.4B | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +60.3% | +35.2% | +95.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +46.7% | -2.6% | +18.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.9% | +45.6% | -14.3% | +109.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.9% | +54.7% | +44.9% | +71.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | -3.8% | -8.9% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.9% | -1.0% | 0.0% | -51.1% |
Valuation Metrics
REFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, REFI trades at a 52% valuation discount to IIPR's 14.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, REFI's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CCOI's 21.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $817M | $1.6B | $8.7B | $245M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $2.0B | $25.4B | $328M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.29x | 14.40x | -4.83x | 6.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.17x | — | 6.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.85x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.30x | 9.91x | 9.91x | 9.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.84x | 6.08x | 0.70x | 3.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.87x | — | 0.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.26x | 23.49x | 0.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REFI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CCOI. IIPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REFI's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REFI scores 5/9 vs CCOI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.3% | +6.4% | -79.4% | +6.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +5.1% | -5.3% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | +4.3% | -0.8% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | +5.8% | -0.6% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.21x | — | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.7B | $346M | $16.7B | $83M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $48M | $1.0B | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.9B | $394M | $17.7B | $98M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.52x | 6.67x | -1.12x | 4.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REFI five years ago would be worth $12,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,236 for CCOI. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs CCOI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs CCOI's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | +18.3% | +10.0% | -1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -65.4% | +20.3% | +100.0% | -7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.0% | +14.1% | +267.8% | +25.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.6% | -50.0% | -28.8% | +24.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.1% | +436.4% | -35.7% | +24.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.3% | +4.5% | +54.4% | +7.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IIPR and REFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IIPR currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs CCOI's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 0.92x | 2.74x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $55.24 | $61.40 | $11.95 | $15.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.82 | $44.58 | $3.37 | $10.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.5% | +92.2% | +70.8% | +76.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.3 | 59.3 | 73.4 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 303K | 12.5M | 167K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IIPR and REFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCOI as "Hold", IIPR as "Hold", LUMN as "Hold", REFI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.5% upside for CCOI (target: $28) vs -22.3% for IIPR (target: $44). For income investors, REFI offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs IIPR's 13.46%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $44.00 | $7.08 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 11 | 28 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +19.2% | +13.5% | +0.0% | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.13 | $7.62 | $0.00 | $2045.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
REFI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LUMN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CCOI vs IIPR vs LUMN vs REFI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCOI or IIPR or LUMN or REFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCOI or IIPR or LUMN or REFI?
On trailing P/E, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCOI or IIPR or LUMN or REFI?
Over the past 5 years, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) delivered a total return of +24. 7%, compared to -57. 6% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +436. 4% versus LUMN's -35. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCOI or IIPR or LUMN or REFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately 300% more volatile than REFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 32% for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCOI or IIPR or LUMN or REFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 11. 6% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCOI leads at 17. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCOI or IIPR or LUMN or REFI?
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) is the more profitable company, earning 57. 1% net margin versus -18. 7% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 57. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REFI leads at 57. 1% versus -10. 6% for CCOI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIPR leads at 88. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCOI or IIPR or LUMN or REFI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(REFI) trades at 6. 4x forward P/E versus 13. 2x for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCOI: 68. 5% to $27. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCOI or IIPR or LUMN or REFI?
In this comparison, REFI (100.
0% yield), CCOI (19. 2% yield), IIPR (13. 5% yield) pay a dividend. LUMN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCOI or IIPR or LUMN or REFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 13. 5% yield, +436. 4% 10Y return). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IIPR: +436. 4%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCOI and IIPR and LUMN and REFI?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCOI (Communication Services) and IIPR (Real Estate) and LUMN (Communication Services) and REFI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCOI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REFI is a small-cap high-growth stock. CCOI, IIPR, REFI pay a dividend while LUMN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 19%
- Dividend Yield > 7.6%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.