Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CCSI vs OPEN vs NTCT vs EGHT vs QLYS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
CCSI vs OPEN vs NTCT vs EGHT vs QLYS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Real Estate - Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $520M | $4.08B | $2.77B | $372M | $3.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $351M | $3.94B | $861M | $728M | $685M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $88M | $-1.39B | $96M | $-4M | $201M |
| Gross Margin | 80.2% | 7.9% | 79.2% | 65.7% | 83.1% |
| Operating Margin | 42.9% | -9.9% | 12.8% | 2.6% | 33.7% |
| Forward P/E | 5.0x | — | 15.9x | 7.3x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $580M | $193M | $76M | $410M | $97M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $962M | $457M | $88M | $250M |
CCSI vs OPEN vs NTCT vs EGHT vs QLYS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus Cloud Sol… (CCSI) | 100 | 79.4 | -20.6% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 25.9 | -74.1% |
| NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT) | 100 | 142.0 | +42.0% |
| 8x8, Inc. (EGHT) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCSI vs OPEN vs NTCT vs EGHT vs QLYS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 12.9x)
OPEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +5.1% vs QLYS's -25.6%
NTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 1.75x
Among these 5 stocks, EGHT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
QLYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.53
- Rev growth 10.1%, EPS growth 17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- 267.2% 10Y total return vs NTCT's 66.6%
- Beta 0.53, current ratio 1.41x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.1% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 12.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.4% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs QLYS's -25.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.1% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 47.5% vs -15.8% |
CCSI vs OPEN vs NTCT vs EGHT vs QLYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CCSI vs OPEN vs NTCT vs EGHT vs QLYS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QLYS leads in 1 of 6 categories
OPEN leads 1 • CCSI leads 0 • NTCT leads 0 • EGHT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QLYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 11.2x CCSI's $351M. QLYS is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, QLYS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $351M | $3.9B | $861M | $728M | $685M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $164M | -$363M | $171M | $48M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $88M | -$1.4B | $96M | -$4M | $201M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $112M | $1.1B | $275M | $62M | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.2% | +7.9% | +79.2% | +65.7% | +83.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +42.9% | -9.9% | +12.8% | +2.6% | +33.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | -35.2% | +11.1% | -0.5% | +29.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | +27.2% | +32.0% | +8.6% | +42.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.5% | -37.6% | -0.5% | +5.0% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.5% | -50.0% | +11.9% | +59.6% | +10.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CCSI and EGHT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.5x trailing earnings, CCSI trades at a 63% valuation discount to QLYS's 17.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCSI's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than QLYS's 13.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $520M | $4.1B | $2.8B | $372M | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $3.3B | $2.4B | $694M | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.50x | -3.13x | -7.57x | -12.71x | 17.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.99x | — | 15.87x | 7.27x | 12.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.07x | — | — | 12.76x | 13.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.49x | 0.93x | 3.36x | 0.52x | 5.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 39.95x | 4.06x | 1.78x | 2.84x | 6.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.92x | 3.93x | 13.11x | 7.43x | 10.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NTCT and QLYS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCSI delivers a 52.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. NTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCSI's 42.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTCT scores 6/9 vs EGHT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +52.9% | -163.2% | +6.1% | -2.7% | +37.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.2% | -53.6% | +4.3% | -0.6% | +19.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.2% | -15.8% | -19.3% | +2.5% | +47.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.8% | -11.7% | -18.5% | +2.8% | +37.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 42.14x | 0.19x | 0.05x | 3.36x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $506M | -$769M | -$381M | $322M | -$153M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $962M | $457M | $88M | $250M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $580M | $193M | $76M | $410M | $97M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.95x | -8.92x | 55.89x | 0.69x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTCT five years ago would be worth $14,293 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $922 for EGHT. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs QLYS's -25.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs CCSI's -7.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.2% | -12.4% | +42.6% | +41.3% | -27.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.8% | +510.1% | +80.5% | +51.7% | -25.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.8% | +159.5% | +30.3% | -8.2% | -17.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.6% | -71.6% | +42.9% | -90.8% | -3.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.6% | -50.8% | +66.6% | -77.0% | +267.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.9% | +37.4% | +9.2% | -2.8% | -6.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTCT and QLYS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTCT currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs OPEN's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 3.09x | 1.12x | 1.49x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.66 | $10.87 | $39.24 | $2.88 | $155.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.24 | $0.51 | $19.98 | $1.56 | $74.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.3% | +48.9% | +97.6% | +92.7% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 56.2 | 68.6 | 61.1 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 123K | 36.3M | 552K | 1.2M | 773K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCSI as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", NTCT as "Hold", EGHT as "Hold", QLYS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 640.4% upside for EGHT (target: $20) vs -24.3% for NTCT (target: $29).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $6.50 | $29.00 | $19.77 | $134.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 26 | 21 | 28 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +5.5% |
QLYS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). OPEN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
CCSI vs OPEN vs NTCT vs EGHT vs QLYS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCSI or OPEN or NTCT or EGHT or QLYS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the stronger pick with 10. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (5. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCSI or OPEN or NTCT or EGHT or QLYS?
On trailing P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) is the cheapest at 6. 5x versus Qualys, Inc. at 17. 5x. On forward P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCSI or OPEN or NTCT or EGHT or QLYS?
Over the past 5 years, NetScout Systems, Inc.
(NTCT) delivered a total return of +42. 9%, compared to -90. 8% for 8x8, Inc. (EGHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QLYS returned +267. 2% versus EGHT's -77. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCSI or OPEN or NTCT or EGHT or QLYS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 482% more volatile than QLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 42% for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCSI or OPEN or NTCT or EGHT or QLYS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is pulling ahead at 10. 1% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 8x8, Inc. grew EPS 62. 5% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QLYS leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCSI or OPEN or NTCT or EGHT or QLYS?
Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -44. 6% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCSI leads at 43. 0% versus -44. 7% for NTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QLYS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCSI or OPEN or NTCT or EGHT or QLYS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for NetScout Systems, Inc. — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGHT: 640. 4% to $19. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCSI or OPEN or NTCT or EGHT or QLYS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CCSI or OPEN or NTCT or EGHT or QLYS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), +267. 2% 10Y return). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QLYS: +267. 2%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCSI and OPEN and NTCT and EGHT and QLYS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCSI (Technology) and OPEN (Real Estate) and NTCT (Technology) and EGHT (Technology) and QLYS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCSI is a small-cap deep-value stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EGHT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QLYS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.