Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CDLR vs TDW vs OII vs GLDD vs ACDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Engineering & Construction
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
CDLR vs TDW vs OII vs GLDD vs ACDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Engineering & Construction | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $2.52B | $3.87B | $3.65B | $1.14B | $1.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $539M | $1.35B | $2.80B | $888M | $1.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $270M | $298M | $339M | $73M | $-367M |
| Gross Margin | 63.7% | 22.4% | 20.0% | 22.9% | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | 52.9% | 20.0% | 10.3% | 14.1% | -8.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.9x | 19.8x | 20.5x | 15.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $582M | $655M | $487M | $458M | $1.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $579M | $689M | $13M | $23M |
CDLR vs TDW vs OII vs GLDD vs ACDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cadeler A/S (CDLR) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Tidewater Inc. (TDW) | 100 | 108.0 | +8.0% |
| Oceaneering Interna… (OII) | 100 | 171.9 | +71.9% |
| Great Lakes Dredge … (GLDD) | 100 | 221.4 | +121.4% |
| ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC) | 100 | 77.6 | -22.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDLR vs TDW vs OII vs GLDD vs ACDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CDLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 129.0%, EPS growth 230.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 59.8%
- 129.0% revenue growth vs ACDC's -11.4%
- Better valuation composite
- 50.0% margin vs ACDC's -18.9%
TDW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.74
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 48.1%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.74, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.74 vs CDLR's 1.08
OII ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +99.0% vs CDLR's +49.5%
GLDD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 276.9% 10Y total return vs CDLR's 58.3%
Among these 5 stocks, ACDC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 129.0% revenue growth vs ACDC's -11.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.0% margin vs ACDC's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs CDLR's 1.08 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.0% vs CDLR's +49.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 15.2% vs -4.6% |
CDLR vs TDW vs OII vs GLDD vs ACDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CDLR vs TDW vs OII vs GLDD vs ACDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GLDD leads in 2 of 6 categories
CDLR leads 1 • ACDC leads 1 • OII leads 1 • TDW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OII is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 5.2x CDLR's $539M. CDLR is the more profitable business, keeping 50.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%. On growth, CDLR holds the edge at +91.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $539M | $1.3B | $2.8B | $888M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $382M | $477M | $394M | $169M | $251M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $270M | $298M | $339M | $73M | -$367M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$664M | $282M | $240M | $99M | $20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.7% | +22.4% | +20.0% | +22.9% | +3.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | +20.0% | +10.3% | +14.1% | -8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | +22.2% | +12.1% | +8.3% | -18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -123.3% | +20.9% | +8.6% | +11.2% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.5% | -2.2% | +2.7% | +26.5% | -4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +119.4% | -85.5% | -26.5% | -34.5% | -33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ACDC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, OII trades at a 68% valuation discount to CDLR's 32.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TDW's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CDLR's 21.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $3.9B | $3.6B | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $3.9B | $3.4B | $1.6B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.26x | 11.73x | 10.48x | 15.74x | -2.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.93x | 19.79x | 20.47x | 15.40x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 10.15x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.46x | 7.15x | 8.47x | 9.34x | 8.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.64x | 2.86x | 1.31x | 1.28x | 0.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.72x | 2.86x | 3.44x | 2.23x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.96x | 17.55x | 11.41x | 60.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OII leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OII delivers a 34.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. OII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TDW scores 8/9 vs ACDC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.4% | +23.8% | +34.3% | +14.8% | -38.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.5% | +13.4% | +13.3% | +5.8% | -13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +15.2% | +23.4% | +9.7% | -4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | +15.2% | +17.7% | +11.4% | -6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 0.48x | 0.45x | 0.89x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $524M | $76M | -$201M | $445M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $579M | $689M | $13M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $582M | $655M | $487M | $458M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 21.99x | 4.05x | 7.65x | 3.32x | -1.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GLDD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TDW five years ago would be worth $55,614 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,633 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, OII leads with a +99.0% total return vs CDLR's +49.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLDD at 42.7% vs ACDC's -13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +51.2% | +49.1% | +47.2% | +28.2% | +62.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.5% | +97.5% | +99.0% | +72.1% | +55.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.3% | +81.9% | +115.9% | +190.6% | -35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.3% | +456.1% | +137.5% | +19.7% | -63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.3% | -67.7% | +16.7% | +276.9% | -63.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.5% | +22.1% | +29.3% | +42.7% | -13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TDW and GLDD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDW is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDLR's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLDD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs ACDC's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.74x | 1.06x | 0.92x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.18 | $93.13 | $40.12 | $17.02 | $10.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.37 | $38.24 | $18.31 | $9.85 | $3.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +83.6% | +91.2% | +99.9% | +61.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.7 | 43.2 | 51.4 | 68.5 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 89K | 852K | 1.2M | 1.9M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
GLDD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CDLR as "Buy", TDW as "Hold", OII as "Hold", GLDD as "Buy", ACDC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 50.3% upside for TDW (target: $117) vs -9.8% for OII (target: $33).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $117.00 | $33.00 | — | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 26 | 44 | 7 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 6 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.3% | +1.2% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
GLDD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). CDLR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CDLR vs TDW vs OII vs GLDD vs ACDC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDLR or TDW or OII or GLDD or ACDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cadeler A/S (CDLR) is the stronger pick with 129.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Oceaneering International, Inc. (OII) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cadeler A/S (CDLR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CDLR or TDW or OII or GLDD or ACDC?
On trailing P/E, Oceaneering International, Inc.
(OII) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus Cadeler A/S at 32. 3x. On forward P/E, Cadeler A/S is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CDLR or TDW or OII or GLDD or ACDC?
Over the past 5 years, Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) delivered a total return of +456. 1%, compared to -63. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLDD returned +276. 9% versus TDW's -67. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CDLR or TDW or OII or GLDD or ACDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Cadeler A/S's 1. 08β — meaning CDLR is approximately 46% more volatile than TDW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oceaneering International, Inc. (OII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CDLR or TDW or OII or GLDD or ACDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadeler A/S (CDLR) is pulling ahead at 129.
0% versus -11. 4% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cadeler A/S grew EPS 230. 4% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDLR leads at 59. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CDLR or TDW or OII or GLDD or ACDC?
Cadeler A/S (CDLR) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
2% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 26. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDLR leads at 27. 9% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDLR leads at 48. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CDLR or TDW or OII or GLDD or ACDC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cadeler A/S (CDLR) trades at 9.
9x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for Oceaneering International, Inc. — 10. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TDW: 50. 3% to $117. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CDLR or TDW or OII or GLDD or ACDC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CDLR or TDW or OII or GLDD or ACDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
92), +276. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLDD: +276. 9%, OII: +16. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CDLR and TDW and OII and GLDD and ACDC?
These companies operate in different sectors (CDLR (Industrials) and TDW (Energy) and OII (Energy) and GLDD (Industrials) and ACDC (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CDLR is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDW is a small-cap deep-value stock; OII is a small-cap deep-value stock; GLDD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACDC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.