Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CDLX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs PERI vs MKSI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CDLX
Cardlytics, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$43M
5Y Perf.-98.9%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.92B
5Y Perf.+197.0%
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.47B
5Y Perf.+213.1%
PERI
Perion Network Ltd.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$483M
5Y Perf.+95.6%
MKSI
MKS Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+184.8%

CDLX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs PERI vs MKSI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CDLX logoCDLX
ACMR logoACMR
ICHR logoICHR
PERI logoPERI
MKSI logoMKSI
IndustryAdvertising AgenciesSemiconductorsSemiconductorsInternet Content & InformationHardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$43M$3.92B$2.47B$483M$20.25B
Revenue (TTM)$206M$901M$959M$440M$4.07B
Net Income (TTM)$-95M$94M$-51M$-8M$327M
Gross Margin38.9%44.4%11.3%33.3%45.2%
Operating Margin-22.8%12.1%-3.8%-3.4%14.8%
Forward P/E29.7x62.2x8.9x30.4x
Total Debt$215M$303M$186M$42M$4.69B
Cash & Equiv.$49M$766M$98M$91M$675M

CDLX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs PERI vs MKSILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CDLX
ACMR
ICHR
PERI
MKSI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX)1001.1-98.9%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100297.0+197.0%
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR)100313.1+213.1%
Perion Network Ltd. (PERI)100195.6+95.6%
MKS Inc. (MKSI)100284.8+184.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CDLX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs PERI vs MKSI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACMR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Perion Network Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. ICHR and MKSI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CDLX
Cardlytics, Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CDLX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Growth Play

ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
  • 30.7% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
  • 15.2% revenue growth vs CDLX's -16.2%
  • 10.4% margin vs CDLX's -46.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
The Momentum Pick

ICHR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +329.1% vs CDLX's -63.8%
Best for: momentum
PERI
Perion Network Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

PERI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 6.3%, current ratio 2.76x
  • Lower P/E (8.9x vs 30.4x)
  • Beta 0.94 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Income Pick

MKSI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
  • Beta 2.64, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.71x
  • 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthACMR logoACMR15.2% revenue growth vs CDLX's -16.2%
ValuePERI logoPERILower P/E (8.9x vs 30.4x)
Quality / MarginsACMR logoACMR10.4% margin vs CDLX's -46.0%
Stability / SafetyPERI logoPERIBeta 0.94 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage
DividendsMKSI logoMKSI0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ICHR logoICHR+329.1% vs CDLX's -63.8%
Efficiency (ROA)ACMR logoACMR3.9% ROA vs CDLX's -31.5%, ROIC 7.0% vs -18.3%

CDLX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs PERI vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CDLXCardlytics, Inc.
FY 2025
Cost per Redemption
50.9%$129M
Cost per Served Sales
31.1%$79M
Bridg Total Revenue
8.2%$21M
Bridg Subscription Revenue
8.2%$21M
Cost Other
1.6%$4M
ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M
ICHRIchor Holdings, Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

PERIPerion Network Ltd.
FY 2024
Display and Social Advertising
67.3%$336M
Search Advertising and other
32.7%$163M
MKSIMKS Inc.
FY 2025
Product
87.4%$3.4B
Service
12.6%$495M

CDLX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs PERI vs MKSI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACMRLAGGINGICHR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 19.8x CDLX's $206M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDLX's -46.0%. On growth, MKSI holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$206M$901M$959M$440M$4.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$23M$126M-$11M$3M$945M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$95M$94M-$51M-$8M$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$6M-$69M-$17M$39M$401M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.9%+44.4%+11.3%+33.3%+45.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-22.8%+12.1%-3.8%-3.4%+14.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-46.0%+10.4%-5.3%-1.8%+8.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.9%-7.6%-1.7%+8.9%+9.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-44.6%+9.4%+4.7%+5.8%+15.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.8%-76.1%+46.2%+72.7%+53.2%
MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PERI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 43.2x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 37% valuation discount to MKSI's 68.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MKSI's 26.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PERI's 106.0x.

MetricCDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
Market CapShares × price$43M$3.9B$2.5B$483M$20.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$210M$3.5B$2.6B$434M$24.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.40x43.21x-46.25x-56.74x68.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.68x62.25x8.89x30.36x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.22x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.49x106.04x26.70x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.18x4.35x2.61x1.10x5.15x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.06x3.67x0.67x7.49x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.89x12.66x40.74x
PERI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-9 for CDLX. PERI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CDLX scores 6/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-8.7%+6.1%-7.5%-1.2%+12.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-31.5%+3.9%-5.2%-0.9%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-18.3%+7.0%-3.9%-1.7%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-20.9%+6.6%-4.7%-1.8%+7.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–962336
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.16x0.28x0.06x1.73x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$167M-$463M$87M-$49M$4.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$49M$766M$98M$91M$675M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$215M$303M$186M$42M$4.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-14.37x20.44x-5.97x2.84x
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $78 for CDLX. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs CDLX's -63.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs CDLX's -48.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-30.2%+31.9%+249.0%+15.3%+78.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-63.8%+195.6%+329.1%+16.9%+306.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.5%+487.9%+151.1%-68.0%+266.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.2%+133.4%+28.9%-37.2%+66.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.2%+3065.8%+629.1%+139.6%+750.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-48.8%+80.5%+35.9%-31.6%+54.1%
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ICHR and PERI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PERI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs CDLX's 23.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.18x3.24x3.93x0.94x2.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.28$71.65$72.87$11.79$326.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.66$19.26$13.12$8.07$71.49
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+23.8%+82.6%+97.7%+91.4%+92.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.660.766.959.165.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M1.2M795K321K1.2M
Evenly matched — ICHR and PERI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ACMR as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", PERI as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.9% upside for PERI (target: $14) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ACMR's 0.19%.

MetricCDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$40.00$49.80$14.00$272.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts10141329
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3100
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11$0.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%0.0%+14.7%+0.2%
Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MKSI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CDLX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs PERI vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CDLX or ACMR or ICHR or PERI or MKSI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (29. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CDLX or ACMR or ICHR or PERI or MKSI?

On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 2x versus MKS Inc. at 68. 8x. On forward P/E, Perion Network Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CDLX or ACMR or ICHR or PERI or MKSI?

Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -99. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus CDLX's -94. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CDLX or ACMR or ICHR or PERI or MKSI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perion Network Ltd.

(PERI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 317% more volatile than PERI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CDLX or ACMR or ICHR or PERI or MKSI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -16. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -176. 0% for Perion Network Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CDLX or ACMR or ICHR or PERI or MKSI?

ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -44. 4% for Cardlytics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -20. 2% for CDLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDLX leads at 45. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CDLX or ACMR or ICHR or PERI or MKSI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Perion Network Ltd.

(PERI) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 53. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PERI: 29. 9% to $14. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CDLX or ACMR or ICHR or PERI or MKSI?

In this comparison, MKSI (0.

3% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CDLX, ICHR, PERI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CDLX or ACMR or ICHR or PERI or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Perion Network Ltd.

(PERI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), +139. 6% 10Y return). Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PERI: +139. 6%, CDLX: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CDLX and ACMR and ICHR and PERI and MKSI?

These companies operate in different sectors (CDLX (Communication Services) and ACMR (Technology) and ICHR (Technology) and PERI (Communication Services) and MKSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CDLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PERI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CDLX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACMR

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICHR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PERI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MKSI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CDLX and ACMR and ICHR and PERI and MKSI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CDLX: -44.6% · ACMR: 9.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.