Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Equipment & Services
CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $23M | $1.57B | $6.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $413M | $3M | $1.29B | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $302K | $68M | $128M |
| Gross Margin | 48.2% | 96.6% | 24.1% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | -3.3% | -97.1% | 7.5% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 22.8x | — | 16.4x | 51.5x |
| Total Debt | $20M | $7M | $24M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $65M | $5M | $112M | $229M |
CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CareDx, Inc (CDNA) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| TherapeuticsMD, Inc. (TXMD) | 100 | 3.6 | -96.4% |
| Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) | 100 | 76.8 | -23.2% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 258.4 | +158.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CDNA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TXMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.51
- Beta 0.51, current ratio 1.92x
- 10.8% margin vs CDNA's -2.0%
- Beta 0.51 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
PGNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 2.73x
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 51.5x)
- 9.0% ROA vs CDNA's -1.9%, ROIC 18.1% vs -5.7%
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs CDNA's 385.1%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs PGNY's 10.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs PGNY's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 51.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.8% margin vs CDNA's -2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.7% vs HIMS's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs CDNA's -1.9%, ROIC 18.1% vs -5.7% |
CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PGNY leads in 2 of 6 categories
TXMD leads 1 • CDNA leads 1 • HIMS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 839.6x TXMD's $3M. TXMD is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDNA's -2.0%. On growth, TXMD holds the edge at +43.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $413M | $3M | $1.3B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | -$2M | $100M | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $302,000 | $68M | $128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $2M | $181M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.2% | +96.6% | +24.1% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | -97.1% | +7.5% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +10.8% | +5.2% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +74.0% | +14.0% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.0% | +43.3% | +1.4% | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.3% | +118.9% | +70.6% | -27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PGNY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.5x trailing earnings, PGNY trades at a 41% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PGNY's 16.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $23M | $1.6B | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $25M | $1.5B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -53.60x | -10.58x | 29.48x | 50.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.85x | — | 16.39x | 51.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.40x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 16.41x | 42.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.92x | 13.21x | 1.22x | 2.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.77x | 0.85x | 3.32x | 12.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.66x | 31.78x | 8.18x | 89.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PGNY leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CDNA. PGNY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TXMD scores 6/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | +1.1% | +13.3% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +0.8% | +9.0% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.7% | -11.4% | +18.1% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.8% | -13.6% | +17.4% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.26x | 0.05x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$46M | $2M | -$88M | $892M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $65M | $5M | $112M | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $7M | $24M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -194.43x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CDNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $369 for TXMD. Over the past 12 months, TXMD leads with a +45.7% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDNA at 37.7% vs TXMD's -19.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +21.8% | -25.6% | -23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.2% | +45.7% | -18.2% | -51.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.1% | -48.2% | -45.0% | +116.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.4% | -96.3% | -62.9% | +137.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +385.1% | -99.5% | +20.2% | +161.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.7% | -19.7% | -18.1% | +29.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CDNA and TXMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXMD is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDNA currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 0.51x | 0.71x | 2.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.24 | $2.95 | $28.75 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.96 | $0.98 | $16.10 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +68.1% | +66.6% | +36.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 43.3 | 57.6 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 667K | 21K | 1.5M | 34.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CDNA as "Buy", PGNY as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.8% upside for PGNY (target: $31) vs 11.9% for CDNA (target: $24).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | — | $30.80 | $29.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | — | 20 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.9% | 0.0% | +5.2% | +1.4% |
PGNY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TXMD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for Progyny, Inc. (PGNY). Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) offers the better valuation at 29. 5x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CareDx, Inc (CDNA) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS?
On trailing P/E, Progyny, Inc.
(PGNY) is the cheapest at 29. 5x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Progyny, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -96. 3% for TherapeuticsMD, Inc. (TXMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDNA returned +385. 1% versus TXMD's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TherapeuticsMD, Inc.
(TXMD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 368% more volatile than TXMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 10. 4% for Progyny, Inc. (PGNY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TherapeuticsMD, Inc. grew EPS 74. 3% year-over-year, compared to -143. 0% for CareDx, Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -123. 9% for TherapeuticsMD, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PGNY leads at 6. 6% versus -270. 3% for TXMD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXMD leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Progyny, Inc.
(PGNY) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 35. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGNY: 60. 8% to $30. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TherapeuticsMD, Inc.
(TXMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51)). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXMD: -99. 5%, HIMS: +161. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CDNA and TXMD and PGNY and HIMS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CDNA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXMD is a small-cap high-growth stock; PGNY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.