Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS vs NTRA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CDNA
CareDx, Inc

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.11B
5Y Perf.-33.3%
TXMD
TherapeuticsMD, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23M
5Y Perf.-96.4%
PGNY
Progyny, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.57B
5Y Perf.-23.2%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.63B
5Y Perf.+158.4%
NTRA
Natera, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31.16B
5Y Perf.+401.3%

CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS vs NTRA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CDNA logoCDNA
TXMD logoTXMD
PGNY logoPGNY
HIMS logoHIMS
NTRA logoNTRA
IndustryMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesMedical - Equipment & ServicesMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$1.11B$23M$1.57B$6.63B$31.16B
Revenue (TTM)$413M$3M$1.29B$2.35B$2.31B
Net Income (TTM)$-8M$302K$68M$128M$-208M
Gross Margin48.2%96.6%24.1%69.7%64.8%
Operating Margin-3.3%-97.1%7.5%4.6%-13.4%
Forward P/E22.8x16.4x51.5x
Total Debt$20M$7M$24M$1.12B$214M
Cash & Equiv.$65M$5M$112M$229M$1.08B

CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS vs NTRALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CDNA
TXMD
PGNY
HIMS
NTRA
StockMay 20May 26Return
CareDx, Inc (CDNA)10066.7-33.3%
TherapeuticsMD, Inc. (TXMD)1003.6-96.4%
Progyny, Inc. (PGNY)10076.8-23.2%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)100258.4+158.4%
Natera, Inc. (NTRA)100501.3+401.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS vs NTRA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TXMD leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Progyny, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. HIMS also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CDNA
CareDx, Inc
The Healthcare Pick

CDNA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
TXMD
TherapeuticsMD, Inc.
The Income Pick

TXMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.51
  • 10.8% margin vs NTRA's -9.0%
  • Beta 0.51 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
  • +45.7% vs HIMS's -51.0%
Best for: income & stability
PGNY
Progyny, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PGNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 2.73x
  • Better valuation composite
  • 9.0% ROA vs NTRA's -10.6%, ROIC 18.1% vs -36.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Growth Play

HIMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
  • 59.0% revenue growth vs PGNY's 10.4%
Best for: growth exposure
NTRA
Natera, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 20.9% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
  • Beta 1.26, current ratio 3.39x
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIMS logoHIMS59.0% revenue growth vs PGNY's 10.4%
ValuePGNY logoPGNYBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsTXMD logoTXMD10.8% margin vs NTRA's -9.0%
Stability / SafetyTXMD logoTXMDBeta 0.51 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TXMD logoTXMD+45.7% vs HIMS's -51.0%
Efficiency (ROA)PGNY logoPGNY9.0% ROA vs NTRA's -10.6%, ROIC 18.1% vs -36.1%

CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS vs NTRA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CDNACareDx, Inc
FY 2025
Service
85.0%$274M
Product
15.0%$48M
TXMDTherapeuticsMD, Inc.
FY 2023
License
100.0%$1M
PGNYProgyny, Inc.
FY 2025
Fertility benefit services revenue
64.5%$831M
Pharmacy benefit services revenue
35.5%$458M
HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NTRANatera, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.6%$2.3B
Licensing and other
0.4%$10M

CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS vs NTRA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPGNYLAGGINGHIMS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TXMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 839.6x TXMD's $3M. TXMD is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTRA's -9.0%. On growth, TXMD holds the edge at +43.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncTXMD logoTXMDTherapeuticsMD, I…PGNY logoPGNYProgyny, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$413M$3M$1.3B$2.3B$2.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2M-$2M$100M$164M-$310M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$8M$302,000$68M$128M-$208M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$65M$2M$181M$73M$97M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.2%+96.6%+24.1%+69.7%+64.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.3%-97.1%+7.5%+4.6%-13.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.0%+10.8%+5.2%+5.5%-9.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.8%+74.0%+14.0%+3.1%+4.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.0%+43.3%+1.4%+28.4%+39.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+126.3%+118.9%+70.6%-27.3%+185.4%
TXMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PGNY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 29.5x trailing earnings, PGNY trades at a 41% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PGNY's 16.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.

MetricCDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncTXMD logoTXMDTherapeuticsMD, I…PGNY logoPGNYProgyny, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$23M$1.6B$6.6B$31.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$25M$1.5B$7.5B$30.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-53.60x-10.58x29.48x50.32x-144.62x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.85x16.39x51.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.40x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.41x42.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.92x13.21x1.22x2.82x13.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.77x0.85x3.32x12.25x17.55x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF30.66x31.78x8.18x89.61x285.53x
PGNY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PGNY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-15 for NTRA. PGNY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TXMD scores 6/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncTXMD logoTXMDTherapeuticsMD, I…PGNY logoPGNYProgyny, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.6%+1.1%+13.3%+23.7%-15.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.9%+0.8%+9.0%+6.0%-10.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.7%-11.4%+18.1%+10.7%-36.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-5.8%-13.6%+17.4%+10.9%-18.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956645
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x0.26x0.05x2.07x0.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$46M$2M-$88M$892M-$862M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$65M$5M$112M$229M$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$20M$7M$24M$1.1B$214M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-194.43x-25.21x
PGNY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $369 for TXMD. Over the past 12 months, TXMD leads with a +45.7% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 60.6% vs TXMD's -19.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncTXMD logoTXMDTherapeuticsMD, I…PGNY logoPGNYProgyny, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.0%+21.8%-25.6%-23.2%-3.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+45.2%+45.7%-18.2%-51.0%+37.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+161.1%-48.2%-45.0%+116.6%+314.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.4%-96.3%-62.9%+137.6%+115.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+385.1%-99.5%+20.2%+161.9%+2089.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+37.7%-19.7%-18.1%+29.4%+60.6%
NTRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CDNA and TXMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TXMD is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDNA currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncTXMD logoTXMDTherapeuticsMD, I…PGNY logoPGNYProgyny, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.39x0.51x0.71x2.40x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.24$2.95$28.75$70.43$256.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.96$0.98$16.10$13.74$131.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.3%+68.1%+66.6%+36.4%+85.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.443.357.654.557.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded667K21K1.5M34.9M1.3M
Evenly matched — CDNA and TXMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CDNA as "Buy", PGNY as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", NTRA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.8% upside for PGNY (target: $31) vs 11.9% for CDNA (target: $24).

MetricCDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncTXMD logoTXMDTherapeuticsMD, I…PGNY logoPGNYProgyny, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.00$30.80$29.67$262.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts13201927
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.9%0.0%+5.2%+1.4%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

PGNY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TXMD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallProgyny, Inc. (PGNY)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CDNA vs TXMD vs PGNY vs HIMS vs NTRA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS or NTRA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for Progyny, Inc. (PGNY). Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) offers the better valuation at 29. 5x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CareDx, Inc (CDNA) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS or NTRA?

On trailing P/E, Progyny, Inc.

(PGNY) is the cheapest at 29. 5x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Progyny, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS or NTRA?

Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -96. 3% for TherapeuticsMD, Inc. (TXMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +20. 9% versus TXMD's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS or NTRA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TherapeuticsMD, Inc.

(TXMD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 368% more volatile than TXMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS or NTRA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 10. 4% for Progyny, Inc. (PGNY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TherapeuticsMD, Inc. grew EPS 74. 3% year-over-year, compared to -143. 0% for CareDx, Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS or NTRA?

Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -123. 9% for TherapeuticsMD, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PGNY leads at 6. 6% versus -270. 3% for TXMD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXMD leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS or NTRA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Progyny, Inc.

(PGNY) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 35. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGNY: 60. 8% to $30. 80.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS or NTRA?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is CDNA or TXMD or PGNY or HIMS or NTRA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, TherapeuticsMD, Inc.

(TXMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51)). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXMD: -99. 5%, HIMS: +161. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CDNA and TXMD and PGNY and HIMS and NTRA?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CDNA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXMD is a small-cap high-growth stock; PGNY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CDNA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TXMD

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PGNY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIMS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTRA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CDNA and TXMD and PGNY and HIMS and NTRA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CDNA: 39.0% · TXMD: 43.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.