Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CDTX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs JAZZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CDTX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs JAZZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $6.96B | $3.68B | $7.61B | $14.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.07B | $0.00 | $4.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-185M | $391M | $-303M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 91.7% | — | 66.9% |
| Operating Margin | -138.1% | 9.8% | — | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 48.5x | — | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $52M | $110K | $5.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $190M | $178M | $357M | $1.39B |
CDTX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs JAZZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cidara Therapeutics… (CDTX) | 100 | 424.1 | +324.1% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 53.9 | -46.1% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 56.1 | -43.9% |
| Jazz Pharmaceutical… (JAZZ) | 100 | 118.0 | +18.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CDTX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs JAZZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CDTX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 2.2%, current ratio 4.25x
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 4.25x
- +10.2% vs ACAD's +47.7%
ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 11.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- 36.5% margin vs CDTX's -133.2%
- 29.8% ROA vs PRAX's -53.5%, ROIC 10.0% vs -65.0%
PRAX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JAZZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.65
- 58.3% 10Y total return vs CDTX's -14.7%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.65 vs PRAX's 1.55
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.9% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.5% margin vs CDTX's -133.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.2% vs ACAD's +47.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.8% ROA vs PRAX's -53.5%, ROIC 10.0% vs -65.0% |
CDTX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs JAZZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CDTX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs JAZZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JAZZ leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACAD leads 1 • CDTX leads 0 • PRAX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JAZZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JAZZ and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDTX's -133.2%. On growth, JAZZ holds the edge at +19.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B | $0 | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$195M | $123M | -$326M | $994M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$185M | $391M | -$303M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$133M | $105M | -$249M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +91.7% | — | +66.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -138.1% | +9.8% | — | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -133.2% | +36.5% | — | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -138.6% | +9.8% | — | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.4% | -100.0% | +19.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.3% | +86.0% | -19.0% | +3.9% |
Valuation Metrics
JAZZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, JAZZ's 24.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 25.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.0B | $3.7B | $7.6B | $14.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.8B | $3.6B | $7.2B | $18.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.28x | 9.38x | -25.07x | -39.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 48.47x | — | 9.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 25.57x | — | 23.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5460.07x | 3.43x | — | 3.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.61x | 3.00x | 8.66x | 3.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 34.98x | — | 11.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-59 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JAZZ's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -43.7% | +41.9% | -58.7% | +0.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.6% | +29.8% | -53.5% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +10.0% | -65.0% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | +10.1% | -49.3% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.04x | 0.00x | 1.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$186M | -$126M | -$357M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $190M | $178M | $357M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $52M | $110,000 | $5.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -3.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CDTX and PRAX and JAZZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CDTX five years ago would be worth $54,797 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,157 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, CDTX leads with a +1023.8% total return vs ACAD's +47.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 176.1% vs ACAD's -0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.2% | -17.9% | +18.0% | +32.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1023.8% | +47.7% | +860.9% | +105.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +944.2% | -0.3% | +2005.6% | +64.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +448.0% | +2.5% | -18.4% | +32.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.7% | -22.3% | -19.0% | +58.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +118.6% | -0.1% | +176.1% | +18.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CDTX and JAZZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JAZZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDTX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ACAD's 77.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.26x | 1.55x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $221.42 | $27.81 | $356.00 | $230.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.51 | $14.45 | $34.89 | $97.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +77.2% | +94.9% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 84.8 | 52.3 | 53.7 | 67.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 1.7M | 376K | 956K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CDTX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", JAZZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.9% upside for ACAD (target: $35) vs -5.4% for JAZZ (target: $216).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $221.50 | $34.78 | $544.40 | $216.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 37 | 16 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
JAZZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACAD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CDTX vs ACAD vs PRAX vs JAZZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CDTX or ACAD or PRAX or JAZZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (48. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (CDTX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CDTX or ACAD or PRAX or JAZZ?
On forward P/E, Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc is actually cheaper at 9.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CDTX or ACAD or PRAX or JAZZ?
Over the past 5 years, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.
(CDTX) delivered a total return of +448. 0%, compared to -18. 4% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JAZZ returned +58. 3% versus ACAD's -22. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CDTX or ACAD or PRAX or JAZZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (JAZZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 139% more volatile than JAZZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 126% for Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CDTX or ACAD or PRAX or JAZZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -409. 5% for Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CDTX or ACAD or PRAX or JAZZ?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -133. 2% for Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -138. 1% for CDTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDTX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CDTX or ACAD or PRAX or JAZZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (JAZZ) trades at 9.
5x forward P/E versus 48. 5x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 39. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACAD: 61. 9% to $34. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — CDTX or ACAD or PRAX or JAZZ?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CDTX or ACAD or PRAX or JAZZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (JAZZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
65)). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JAZZ: +58. 3%, PRAX: -19. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CDTX and ACAD and PRAX and JAZZ?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CDTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JAZZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.