Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CEP vs BGC vs CFFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Banks - Regional
CEP vs BGC vs CFFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Financial - Capital Markets | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $147M | $5.38B | $252M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $3.01B | $186M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $155M | $27M |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.5% | 69.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.5% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 118.9x | 7.9x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $333K | $1.80B | $116M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25K | $874M | $14M |
CEP vs BGC vs CFFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cantor Equity Partn… (CEP) | 100 | 142.4 | +42.4% |
| BGC Group, Inc (BGC) | 100 | 88.1 | -11.9% |
| C&F Financial Corpo… (CFFI) | 100 | 119.7 | +19.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CEP vs BGC vs CFFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CEP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 6.4% NII/revenue growth vs CFFI's 11.8%
BGC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth 24.0%
- PEG 0.26 vs CFFI's 1.16
CFFI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 2.4%
- 144.1% 10Y total return vs BGC's 130.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 44.1%, current ratio 24.17x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% NII/revenue growth vs CFFI's 11.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 118.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs BGC's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs CEP's 1.37 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BGC's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.3% vs CEP's -55.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs BGC's 0.8% |
CEP vs BGC vs CFFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CEP vs BGC vs CFFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFFI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BGC and CEP operate at a comparable scale, with $3.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. CFFI is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BGC's 5.2%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $3.0B | $186M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $456M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $155M | $27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $456,350 | $307M | $22M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +89.5% | +69.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +10.5% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +5.2% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.9% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | -40.0% | +10.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CFFI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CFFI trades at a 92% valuation discount to CEP's 118.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BGC offers better value at 1.20x vs CFFI's 1.45x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $147M | $5.4B | $252M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $147M | $6.3B | $354M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 118.92x | 36.42x | 9.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.92x | 7.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.20x | 1.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 95.78x | 15.02x | 10.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.79x | 1.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.79x | 4.74x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.08x | 11.38x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BGC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BGC delivers a 13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for CEP. CEP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BGC's 1.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BGC scores 8/9 vs CEP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.0% | +13.7% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +3.1% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +8.6% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | +9.0% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.57x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $307,992 | $922M | $102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25,000 | $874M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $332,992 | $1.8B | $116M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.71x | 0.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BGC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BGC five years ago would be worth $20,922 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,270 for CEP. Over the past 12 months, CFFI leads with a +24.3% total return vs CEP's -55.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BGC at 40.4% vs CEP's 12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +26.5% | +10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.3% | +22.1% | +24.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.7% | +176.9% | +66.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.7% | +109.2% | +95.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.7% | +130.1% | +144.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.6% | +40.4% | +18.5% |
Risk & Volatility
CFFI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CFFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CEP's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CFFI currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs CEP's 26.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 0.78x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.00 | $11.90 | $80.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.71 | $8.27 | $57.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.9% | +94.8% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 48.6 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 2.4M | 4K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BGC and CFFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CFFI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.37% vs BGC's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.08 | $1.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.2% | +0.4% |
CFFI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BGC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CEP vs BGC vs CFFI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CEP or BGC or CFFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BGC Group, Inc (BGC) is the stronger pick with 36.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 8% for C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI). C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BGC Group, Inc (BGC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CEP or BGC or CFFI?
On trailing P/E, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the cheapest at 9.
3x versus Cantor Equity Partners, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares at 118. 9x. On forward P/E, C&F Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BGC Group, Inc wins at 0. 26x versus C&F Financial Corporation's 1. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CEP or BGC or CFFI?
Over the past 5 years, BGC Group, Inc (BGC) delivered a total return of +109.
2%, compared to +42. 7% for Cantor Equity Partners, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (CEP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CFFI returned +144. 1% versus CEP's +42. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CEP or BGC or CFFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
61β versus Cantor Equity Partners, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares's 1. 37β — meaning CEP is approximately 125% more volatile than CFFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cantor Equity Partners, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (CEP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 157% for BGC Group, Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CEP or BGC or CFFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BGC Group, Inc (BGC) is pulling ahead at 36.
3% versus 11. 8% for C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cantor Equity Partners, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS 706. 1% year-over-year, compared to 24. 0% for BGC Group, Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CEP or BGC or CFFI?
C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Cantor Equity Partners, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CFFI leads at 17. 8% versus 0. 0% for CEP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BGC leads at 89. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CEP or BGC or CFFI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, BGC Group, Inc (BGC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus C&F Financial Corporation's 1. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 7. 9x for BGC Group, Inc — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CEP or BGC or CFFI?
In this comparison, CFFI (2.
4% yield), BGC (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CEP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CEP or BGC or CFFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
61), 2. 4% yield, +144. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CFFI: +144. 1%, CEP: +42. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CEP and BGC and CFFI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CEP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BGC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CFFI is a small-cap deep-value stock. BGC, CFFI pay a dividend while CEP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.