Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CFFN vs NWBI vs CZWI vs FULT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CFFN vs NWBI vs CZWI vs FULT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $2.02B | $203M | $4.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $417M | $877M | $90M | $1.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73M | $126M | $14M | $392M |
| Gross Margin | 47.3% | 68.3% | 54.7% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 19.9% | 18.8% | 7.0% | 25.7% |
| Forward P/E | 11.8x | 10.2x | 11.8x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.95B | $446M | $52M | $1.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $252M | $234M | $119M | $271M |
CFFN vs NWBI vs CZWI vs FULT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capitol Federal Fin… (CFFN) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 191.3 | +91.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CFFN vs NWBI vs CZWI vs FULT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CFFN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 79.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5%
NWBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 5.4%
- 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Lower P/E (10.2x vs 11.8x), PEG 1.24 vs 2.32
- 5.4% yield, vs CZWI's 1.8%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs FULT's 106.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.76 vs CFFN's 5.80
- NIM 3.2% vs CFFN's 1.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 11.8x), PEG 1.24 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs NWBI's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5% |
CFFN vs NWBI vs CZWI vs FULT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CFFN vs NWBI vs CZWI vs FULT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FULT leads in 2 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • CFFN leads 0 • NWBI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NWBI and FULT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 21.0x CZWI's $90M. FULT is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NWBI's 14.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $417M | $877M | $90M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $97M | $166M | $9M | $529M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73M | $126M | $14M | $392M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | $142M | $11M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.3% | +68.3% | +54.7% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +18.8% | +7.0% | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +14.4% | +16.0% | +20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +16.2% | +11.5% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | +19.2% | +63.0% | +47.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FULT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 31% valuation discount to CFFN's 15.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.74x vs CFFN's 7.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $2.0B | $203M | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $2.2B | $136M | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.04x | 15.03x | 14.44x | 10.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.85x | 10.20x | 11.78x | 10.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.36x | 1.83x | 2.85x | 0.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.91x | 13.57x | 15.28x | 9.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.43x | 2.31x | 2.25x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 1.07x | 1.09x | 1.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.37x | 14.27x | 19.55x | 14.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FULT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FULT delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for CFFN. NWBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFN's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFN scores 7/9 vs FULT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +7.2% | +7.8% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.8% | +0.8% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +5.6% | +2.0% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +6.8% | +0.6% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.86x | 0.24x | 0.28x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $213M | -$67M | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $252M | $234M | $119M | $271M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $446M | $52M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | 0.73x | 0.16x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,144 for CFFN. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs NWBI's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs NWBI's 16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.0% | +18.8% | +21.5% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.6% | +18.3% | +45.6% | +29.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | +56.2% | +160.0% | +130.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.6% | +26.6% | +71.2% | +41.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.0% | +52.3% | +157.0% | +106.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.2% | +16.0% | +37.5% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CFFN and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CFFN currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.73x | 0.46x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.96 | $14.26 | $22.62 | $22.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.51 | $11.25 | $12.83 | $16.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +97.0% | +93.2% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 64.4 | 63.7 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 926K | 1.3M | 40K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWBI and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CFFN as "Hold", NWBI as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", FULT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for FULT (target: $24) vs -10.5% for CFFN (target: $7). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.42% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $14.67 | — | $24.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 14 | 2 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | +5.4% | +1.8% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.34 | $0.75 | $0.37 | $0.77 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +1.6% |
FULT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
CFFN vs NWBI vs CZWI vs FULT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CFFN or NWBI or CZWI or FULT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CFFN or NWBI or CZWI or FULT?
On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CFFN or NWBI or CZWI or FULT?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to -18. 6% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus CFFN's +12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CFFN or NWBI or CZWI or FULT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 1. 13β — meaning FULT is approximately 146% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 186% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CFFN or NWBI or CZWI or FULT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. grew EPS 79. 3% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CFFN or NWBI or CZWI or FULT?
Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
7% net margin versus 14. 4% for Northwest Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FULT leads at 25. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWBI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CFFN or NWBI or CZWI or FULT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FULT: 11. 9% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CFFN or NWBI or CZWI or FULT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is CFFN or NWBI or CZWI or FULT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, FULT: +106. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CFFN and NWBI and CZWI and FULT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CFFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.