Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CGTL vs CAN vs BTBT vs MARA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
CGTL vs CAN vs BTBT vs MARA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Computer Hardware | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $22M | $331M | $589M | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $530M | $164M | $907M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-210M | $137M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 7.8% | 61.9% | -47.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | -21.0% | 16.8% | -90.6% |
| Forward P/E | 5.2x | — | 9.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $127K | $55M | $14M | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $443K | $81M | $95M | $547M |
CGTL vs CAN vs BTBT vs MARA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Global Tec… (CGTL) | 100 | 29.3 | -70.7% |
| Canaan Inc. (CAN) | 100 | 24.3 | -75.7% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 39.7 | -60.3% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CGTL vs CAN vs BTBT vs MARA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CGTL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.78, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 5.39x
- Beta 1.78, current ratio 5.39x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.78 vs CAN's 4.41, lower leverage
CAN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 4.41
BTBT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CGTL's -29.2%
- 17.3% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -51.6% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -60.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CGTL's -29.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs MARA's -144.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.78 vs CAN's 4.41, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.0% vs CAN's -14.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 152.8% ROA vs CAN's -34.9%, ROIC 43.1% vs -24.9% |
CGTL vs CAN vs BTBT vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CGTL vs CAN vs BTBT vs MARA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CGTL leads in 2 of 6 categories
BTBT leads 1 • MARA leads 1 • CAN leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 15.2x CGTL's $60M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%. On growth, CAN holds the edge at +121.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $530M | $164M | $907M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | -$66M | $166M | $627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | -$210M | $137M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $0 | -$448M | -$312M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +7.8% | +61.9% | -47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | -21.0% | +16.8% | -90.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | -39.7% | +17.3% | -144.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | — | -65.3% | -34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -92.3% | +121.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | +59.4% | +2.8% | -4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CGTL leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, CGTL trades at a 43% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CGTL's 4.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTBT's 8.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $331M | $589M | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $305M | $508M | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.19x | -1.14x | 9.15x | -3.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.13x | — | 8.49x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.61x | 0.62x | 3.60x | 5.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.62x | 0.55x | 0.56x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CGTL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CGTL delivers a 156.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $156 in annual profit, vs $-48 for CAN. CGTL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAN scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +156.3% | -48.1% | +21.4% | -30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +152.8% | -34.9% | +19.0% | -17.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +43.1% | -24.9% | +6.5% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +45.7% | -29.7% | +8.5% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.13x | 0.03x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$316,436 | -$26M | -$81M | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $443,322 | $81M | $95M | $547M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $126,886 | $55M | $14M | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2120.00x | -104.52x | — | 4.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MARA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MARA five years ago would be worth $4,054 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $770 for CAN. Over the past 12 months, CGTL leads with a +20.0% total return vs CAN's -14.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MARA at 10.8% vs CAN's -40.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.9% | -33.1% | -10.3% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.0% | -14.1% | -9.0% | -4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.1% | -79.3% | -19.7% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.1% | -92.3% | -84.6% | -59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.1% | -90.1% | -60.4% | -51.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.7% | -40.9% | -7.1% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CGTL and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CGTL is the less volatile stock with a 1.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAN's 4.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs CGTL's 17.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 4.41x | 3.37x | 3.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.40 | $2.22 | $4.55 | $23.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.41 | $0.39 | $1.25 | $6.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +17.0% | +23.2% | +40.2% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 58.4 | 69.1 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 278K | 9.7M | 18.5M | 47.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CAN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAN as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 336.9% upside for CAN (target: $2) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.25 | $5.00 | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 2 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
CGTL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BTBT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CGTL vs CAN vs BTBT vs MARA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CGTL or CAN or BTBT or MARA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 2% for Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL). Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Canaan Inc. (CAN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CGTL or CAN or BTBT or MARA?
On trailing P/E, Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CGTL or CAN or BTBT or MARA?
Over the past 5 years, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) delivered a total return of -59. 5%, compared to -92. 3% for Canaan Inc. (CAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MARA returned -51. 6% versus CAN's -90. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CGTL or CAN or BTBT or MARA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
78β versus Canaan Inc. 's 4. 41β — meaning CAN is approximately 148% more volatile than CGTL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CGTL or CAN or BTBT or MARA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -29. 2% for Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CGTL leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CGTL or CAN or BTBT or MARA?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — CGTL or CAN or BTBT or MARA?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CGTL, CAN, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CGTL or CAN or BTBT or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Canaan Inc. (CAN) carries a higher beta of 4. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CGTL: -72. 1%, CAN: -90. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CGTL and CAN and BTBT and MARA?
These companies operate in different sectors (CGTL (Consumer Cyclical) and CAN (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CGTL is a small-cap deep-value stock; CAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.