Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CGTL vs NXRT vs IRT vs CLPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
Information Technology Services
CGTL vs NXRT vs IRT vs CLPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $22M | $756M | $3.86B | $25M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $252M | $662M | $299M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-32M | $48M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 91.1% | 20.2% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 11.5% | 17.5% | -1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 5.2x | — | 99.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $127K | $1.56B | $2.28B | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $443K | $14M | $48M | $28M |
CGTL vs NXRT vs IRT vs CLPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Global Tec… (CGTL) | 100 | 29.3 | -70.7% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 63.3 | -36.7% |
| Independence Realty… (IRT) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 81.6 | -18.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CGTL vs NXRT vs IRT vs CLPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CGTL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and momentum.
- Better valuation composite
- +20.0% vs NXRT's -15.2%
- 152.8% ROA vs CLPS's -3.2%, ROIC 43.1% vs -7.9%
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 211.1% 10Y total return vs IRT's 191.8%
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CLPS's 14.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
IRT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 7.3% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -181.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs CGTL's -29.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.3% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs CGTL's 1.78 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CLPS's 14.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.0% vs NXRT's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 152.8% ROA vs CLPS's -3.2%, ROIC 43.1% vs -7.9% |
CGTL vs NXRT vs IRT vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CGTL vs NXRT vs IRT vs CLPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CGTL leads in 1 of 6 categories
IRT leads 1 • NXRT leads 0 • CLPS leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NXRT and IRT and CLPS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $662M annually — 11.1x CGTL's $60M. IRT is the more profitable business, keeping 7.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, CLPS holds the edge at +15.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $252M | $662M | $299M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $125M | $365M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | -$32M | $48M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $79M | $139M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +91.1% | +20.2% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +11.5% | +17.5% | -1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | -12.7% | +7.3% | -1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +31.2% | +21.1% | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -92.3% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | 0.0% | -101.4% | +75.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NXRT and CLPS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, CGTL trades at a 92% valuation discount to IRT's 68.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CGTL's 4.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXRT's 18.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $756M | $3.9B | $25M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $2.3B | $6.1B | $31M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.19x | -23.65x | 68.21x | -3.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 99.88x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.13x | 18.60x | 16.71x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.61x | 3.01x | 5.87x | 0.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.62x | 2.52x | 1.07x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.05x | 26.33x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CGTL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CGTL delivers a 156.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $156 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. CGTL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRT scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +156.3% | -10.1% | +1.3% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +152.8% | -1.7% | +0.8% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +43.1% | +1.1% | +1.6% | -7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +45.7% | +1.5% | +2.4% | -9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 5.18x | 0.64x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$316,436 | $1.5B | $2.2B | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $443,322 | $14M | $48M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $126,886 | $1.6B | $2.3B | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2120.00x | 0.47x | 1.73x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRT five years ago would be worth $11,775 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,788 for CGTL. Over the past 12 months, CGTL leads with a +20.0% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRT at 2.4% vs CGTL's -34.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.9% | +2.6% | -6.0% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.0% | -15.2% | -11.9% | -5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.1% | -15.5% | +7.4% | +0.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.1% | -23.0% | +17.8% | -69.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.1% | +211.1% | +191.8% | -78.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.7% | -5.5% | +2.4% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IRT and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CGTL's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRT currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs CGTL's 17.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 0.62x | 0.48x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.40 | $38.30 | $19.61 | $1.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.41 | $23.79 | $14.60 | $0.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +17.0% | +77.8% | +83.5% | +48.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 71.0 | 62.4 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 278K | 216K | 2.2M | 15K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXRT as "Hold", IRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.7% upside for IRT (target: $20) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs IRT's 4.02%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $20.08 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 27 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.1% | +4.0% | +14.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 4 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.11 | $0.66 | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
CGTL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). IRT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
CGTL vs NXRT vs IRT vs CLPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CGTL or NXRT or IRT or CLPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger pick with 15.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 2% for Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL). Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CGTL or NXRT or IRT or CLPS?
On trailing P/E, Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus Independence Realty Trust, Inc. at 68. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CGTL or NXRT or IRT or CLPS?
Over the past 5 years, Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
(IRT) delivered a total return of +17. 8%, compared to -72. 1% for Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus CLPS's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CGTL or NXRT or IRT or CLPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 78β — meaning CGTL is approximately 554% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CGTL or NXRT or IRT or CLPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is pulling ahead at 15.
2% versus -29. 2% for Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares grew EPS 61. 5% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CGTL leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CGTL or NXRT or IRT or CLPS?
Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IRT leads at 18. 4% versus -4. 0% for CLPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CGTL or NXRT or IRT or CLPS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IRT: 22.
7% to $20. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — CGTL or NXRT or IRT or CLPS?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield), NXRT (7. 1% yield), IRT (4. 0% yield) pay a dividend. CGTL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CGTL or NXRT or IRT or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). Creative Global Technology Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (CGTL) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, CGTL: -72. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CGTL and NXRT and IRT and CLPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CGTL (Consumer Cyclical) and NXRT (Real Estate) and IRT (Real Estate) and CLPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CGTL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. NXRT, IRT, CLPS pay a dividend while CGTL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.