Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CHA vs BROS vs SBUX vs QSR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CHA
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-67.2%
BROS
Dutch Bros Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.81B
5Y Perf.-10.3%
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$118.83B
5Y Perf.+30.2%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CA
Market Cap$27.42B
5Y Perf.+22.9%

CHA vs BROS vs SBUX vs QSR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CHA logoCHA
BROS logoBROS
SBUX logoSBUX
QSR logoQSR
IndustryBeverages - Non-AlcoholicRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$1.32B$6.81B$118.83B$27.42B
Revenue (TTM)$13.27B$1.75B$37.70B$9.59B
Net Income (TTM)$1.80B$81M$1.37B$955M
Gross Margin47.2%25.3%20.6%33.1%
Operating Margin15.3%9.4%9.0%25.1%
Forward P/E1.2x60.3x44.0x19.5x
Total Debt$548M$1.09B$26.61B$17.58B
Cash & Equiv.$4.75B$269M$3.22B$1.16B

CHA vs BROS vs SBUX vs QSRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CHA
BROS
SBUX
QSR
StockApr 25May 26Return
Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA)10032.8-67.2%
Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS)10089.7-10.3%
Starbucks Corporati… (SBUX)100130.2+30.2%
Restaurant Brands I… (QSR)100122.9+22.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CHA vs BROS vs SBUX vs QSR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CHA leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Starbucks Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. QSR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CHA
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares
The Growth Play

CHA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 167.4%, EPS growth 214.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 19.9%, current ratio 2.37x
  • 167.4% revenue growth vs SBUX's 2.8%
  • Lower P/E (1.2x vs 44.0x)
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
BROS
Dutch Bros Inc.
The Growth Angle

BROS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation
The Income Pick

SBUX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.

  • 2.3% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs QSR's 3.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • +29.0% vs CHA's -63.0%
Best for: dividends and momentum
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
The Income Pick

QSR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 3.1%
  • 132.2% 10Y total return vs BROS's 46.1%
  • PEG 2.44 vs SBUX's 2.82
  • Beta 0.39, yield 3.1%, current ratio 0.98x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCHA logoCHA167.4% revenue growth vs SBUX's 2.8%
ValueCHA logoCHALower P/E (1.2x vs 44.0x)
Quality / MarginsCHA logoCHA13.6% margin vs SBUX's 3.6%
Stability / SafetyQSR logoQSRBeta 0.39 vs BROS's 1.83
DividendsSBUX logoSBUX2.3% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs QSR's 3.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SBUX logoSBUX+29.0% vs CHA's -63.0%
Efficiency (ROA)CHA logoCHA15.1% ROA vs BROS's 2.7%

CHA vs BROS vs SBUX vs QSR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CHAChagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

BROSDutch Bros Inc.
FY 2025
Franchise Fees
94.7%$122M
Product and Service, Other
5.3%$7M
SBUXStarbucks Corporation
FY 2025
Beverage Member
60.6%$22.5B
Other Products Member
20.4%$7.6B
Food Member
19.0%$7.0B
QSRRestaurant Brands International Inc.
FY 2025
Tim Hortons
62.5%$4.2B
Burger King
22.3%$1.5B
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
11.8%$800M
Firehouse Subs
3.4%$232M

CHA vs BROS vs SBUX vs QSR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCHALAGGINGSBUX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

QSR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SBUX is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.7B annually — 21.6x BROS's $1.7B. CHA is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBUX's 3.6%. On growth, BROS holds the edge at +30.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…BROS logoBROSDutch Bros Inc.SBUX logoSBUXStarbucks Corpora…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$13.3B$1.7B$37.7B$9.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.0B$244M$5.1B$2.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.8B$81M$1.4B$955M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.0B$148M$2.3B$1.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.2%+25.3%+20.6%+33.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.3%+9.4%+9.0%+25.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.6%+4.6%+3.6%+10.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.7%+8.5%+6.2%+15.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-9.4%+30.8%+5.4%+7.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-41.8%0.0%-62.3%+102.1%
QSR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CHA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.5x trailing earnings, CHA trades at a 94% valuation discount to BROS's 85.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SBUX offers better value at 4.10x vs QSR's 4.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…BROS logoBROSDutch Bros Inc.SBUX logoSBUXStarbucks Corpora…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$6.8B$118.8B$27.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$706M$7.6B$142.2B$43.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.46x85.05x63.96x33.68x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.20x60.32x44.00x19.50x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.10x4.21x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.63x27.60x27.01x17.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.73x4.16x3.20x2.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.98x7.50x7.01x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.47x125.12x48.66x18.93x
CHA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CHA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

CHA delivers a 20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $9 for BROS. CHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QSR's 3.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHA scores 8/9 vs SBUX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…BROS logoBROSDutch Bros Inc.SBUX logoSBUXStarbucks Corpora…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+20.8%+9.2%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.1%+2.7%+4.2%+3.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.7%+17.7%+8.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+99.8%+6.4%+16.2%+9.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98646
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x1.21x3.41x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4.2B$820M$23.4B$16.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4.8B$269M$3.2B$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$548M$1.1B$26.6B$17.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense11.85x6.03x3.65x
CHA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BROS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BROS five years ago would be worth $14,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,656 for CHA. Over the past 12 months, SBUX leads with a +29.0% total return vs CHA's -63.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BROS at 18.4% vs CHA's -28.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…BROS logoBROSDutch Bros Inc.SBUX logoSBUXStarbucks Corpora…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-10.7%-13.8%+24.9%+17.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-63.0%-9.5%+29.0%+20.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.4%+66.0%+3.8%+19.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.4%+46.1%+0.8%+30.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.4%+46.1%+114.8%+132.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-28.5%+18.4%+1.3%+6.0%
BROS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SBUX and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

QSR is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BROS's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBUX currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs CHA's 31.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…BROS logoBROSDutch Bros Inc.SBUX logoSBUXStarbucks Corpora…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.79x1.83x0.99x0.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.42$77.88$107.55$81.96
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.98$44.58$77.99$61.33
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+31.0%+68.8%+96.9%+96.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.862.869.147.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded488K4.1M7.7M3.3M
Evenly matched — SBUX and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SBUX and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CHA as "Buy", BROS as "Buy", SBUX as "Hold", QSR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.0% upside for BROS (target: $74) vs 4.0% for SBUX (target: $108). For income investors, QSR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.06% vs SBUX's 2.33%.

MetricCHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…BROS logoBROSDutch Bros Inc.SBUX logoSBUXStarbucks Corpora…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00$74.45$108.38$83.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts15215944
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.3%+3.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises31614
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.43$2.42
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — SBUX and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CHA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). QSR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallChagee Holdings Limited Ame… (CHA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CHA vs BROS vs SBUX vs QSR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CHA or BROS or SBUX or QSR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the stronger pick with 167.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 8% for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E (1. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CHA or BROS or SBUX or QSR?

On trailing P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the cheapest at 5.

5x versus Dutch Bros Inc. at 85. 0x. On forward P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares is actually cheaper at 1. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Restaurant Brands International Inc. wins at 2. 44x versus Starbucks Corporation's 2. 82x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CHA or BROS or SBUX or QSR?

Over the past 5 years, Dutch Bros Inc.

(BROS) delivered a total return of +46. 1%, compared to -63. 4% for Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QSR returned +132. 2% versus CHA's -63. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CHA or BROS or SBUX or QSR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Restaurant Brands International Inc.

(QSR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Dutch Bros Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning BROS is approximately 366% more volatile than QSR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 3% for Restaurant Brands International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CHA or BROS or SBUX or QSR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is pulling ahead at 167.

4% versus 2. 8% for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to -50. 8% for Starbucks Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BROS leads at 30. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CHA or BROS or SBUX or QSR?

Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

3% net margin versus 4. 9% for Dutch Bros Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QSR leads at 23. 7% versus 9. 6% for SBUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHA leads at 45. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CHA or BROS or SBUX or QSR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 44x versus Starbucks Corporation's 2. 82x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) trades at 1. 2x forward P/E versus 60. 3x for Dutch Bros Inc. — 59. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BROS: 39. 0% to $74. 45.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CHA or BROS or SBUX or QSR?

In this comparison, QSR (3.

1% yield), SBUX (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. CHA, BROS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CHA or BROS or SBUX or QSR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Restaurant Brands International Inc.

(QSR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 3. 1% yield, +132. 2% 10Y return). Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QSR: +132. 2%, BROS: +46. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CHA and BROS and SBUX and QSR?

These companies operate in different sectors (CHA (Consumer Defensive) and BROS (Consumer Cyclical) and SBUX (Consumer Cyclical) and QSR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CHA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BROS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBUX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; QSR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. SBUX, QSR pay a dividend while CHA, BROS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CHA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BROS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBUX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

QSR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CHA and BROS and SBUX and QSR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CHA: -9.4% · BROS: 30.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(CHA: 13.6% · BROS: 4.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CHA: 5.5x · BROS: 85.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.