Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CHCI vs NXRT vs IRT vs ELME
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Office
CHCI vs NXRT vs IRT vs ELME — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $179M | $756M | $3.86B | $188M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | $252M | $662M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $-32M | $48M | $-154M |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | 91.1% | 20.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 11.5% | 17.5% | — |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | — | 107.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $6M | $1.56B | $2.28B | $520M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $14M | $48M | $1.33B |
CHCI vs NXRT vs IRT vs ELME — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comstock Holding Co… (CHCI) | 100 | 753.0 | +653.0% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.7 | -6.3% |
| Independence Realty… (IRT) | 100 | 166.1 | +66.1% |
| Elme Communities (ELME) | 100 | 9.6 | -90.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHCI vs NXRT vs IRT vs ELME
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.7%, EPS growth 83.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.2%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs IRT's 191.8%
- 14.7% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 107.6x)
NXRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ELME's 34.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
IRT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ELME is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 34.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.47, yield 34.1%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.47 vs NXRT's 0.62, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.7% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 107.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.9% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs NXRT's 0.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ELME's 34.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.4% vs NXRT's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.6% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 27.8% vs -15.3% |
CHCI vs NXRT vs IRT vs ELME — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CHCI vs NXRT vs IRT vs ELME — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHCI leads in 2 of 6 categories
NXRT leads 1 • IRT leads 0 • ELME leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRT and ELME operate at a comparable scale, with $662M and $0 in trailing revenue. CHCI is the more profitable business, keeping 24.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, IRT holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | $252M | $662M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $125M | $365M | -$44M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | -$32M | $48M | -$154M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $79M | $139M | $62M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +91.1% | +20.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +11.5% | +17.5% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | -12.7% | +7.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +31.2% | +21.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +0.5% | +2.5% | -4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -78.3% | 0.0% | -101.4% | -6.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NXRT and ELME each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, CHCI trades at a 82% valuation discount to IRT's 68.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHCI's 14.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXRT's 18.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $179M | $756M | $3.9B | $188M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $157M | $2.3B | $6.1B | -$624M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.32x | -23.65x | 68.21x | -1.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 107.60x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.27x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.82x | 18.60x | 16.71x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.50x | 3.01x | 5.87x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.43x | 2.52x | 1.07x | 0.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.47x | 9.05x | 26.33x | 3.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHCI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHCI delivers a 24.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-19 for ELME. CHCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRT scores 6/9 vs ELME's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.7% | -10.1% | +1.3% | -18.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.6% | -1.7% | +0.8% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.8% | +1.1% | +1.6% | -15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.9% | +1.5% | +2.4% | -10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 5.18x | 0.64x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | $1.5B | $2.2B | -$812M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $14M | $48M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $1.6B | $2.3B | $520M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.47x | 1.73x | -3.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHCI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHCI five years ago would be worth $33,992 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,705 for NXRT. Over the past 12 months, CHCI leads with a +52.4% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHCI at 58.9% vs NXRT's -5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.1% | +2.6% | -6.0% | -4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.4% | -15.2% | -11.9% | +8.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.2% | -15.5% | +7.4% | +13.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +239.9% | -23.0% | +17.8% | -15.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +875.8% | +211.1% | +191.8% | -11.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.9% | -5.5% | +2.4% | +4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHCI and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ELME is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NXRT's 0.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHCI currently trades 88.1% from its 52-week high vs ELME's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.61x | 0.46x | 0.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.72 | $38.30 | $19.61 | $17.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.00 | $23.79 | $14.60 | $1.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.1% | +77.8% | +83.5% | +12.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.7 | 71.0 | 62.4 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 216K | 2.2M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXRT as "Hold", IRT as "Buy", ELME as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 796.2% upside for ELME (target: $19) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, ELME offers the higher dividend yield at 34.11% vs IRT's 4.02%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $20.08 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 27 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.1% | +4.0% | +34.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.11 | $0.66 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
CHCI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NXRT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
CHCI vs NXRT vs IRT vs ELME: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHCI or NXRT or IRT or ELME a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) is the stronger pick with 14. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHCI or NXRT or IRT or ELME?
On trailing P/E, Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) is the cheapest at 12. 3x versus Independence Realty Trust, Inc. at 68. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHCI or NXRT or IRT or ELME?
Over the past 5 years, Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) delivered a total return of +239. 9%, compared to -23. 0% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHCI returned +881. 5% versus ELME's -11. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHCI or NXRT or IRT or ELME?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Elme Communities (ELME) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
44β versus Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning CHCI is approximately 68% more volatile than ELME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHCI or NXRT or IRT or ELME?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) is pulling ahead at 14. 7% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. grew EPS 83. 1% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHCI leads at 18. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHCI or NXRT or IRT or ELME?
Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.
(CHCI) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHCI leads at 20. 1% versus 0. 0% for ELME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHCI or NXRT or IRT or ELME more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ELME: 796.
2% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHCI or NXRT or IRT or ELME?
In this comparison, ELME (34.
1% yield), NXRT (7. 1% yield), IRT (4. 0% yield) pay a dividend. CHCI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CHCI or NXRT or IRT or ELME better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
(IRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 4. 0% yield, +192. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IRT: +192. 5%, CHCI: +881. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHCI and NXRT and IRT and ELME?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHCI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ELME is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NXRT, IRT, ELME pay a dividend while CHCI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.