Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) vs Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CHD | 1.6% revenue growth vs CL's 1.4% |
| Value | CL | Lower P/E (25.7x vs 27.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | CHD | 11.9% net margin vs CL's 10.5% |
| Stability / Safety | CL | Beta 0.02 vs CHD's 0.04 |
| Dividends | CL | 2.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CHD's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CL | +11.0% vs CHD's -4.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CL | 13.0% ROA vs CHD's 8.3%, ROIC 43.4% vs 13.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Church & Dwight is a consumer goods company that manufactures and markets household, personal care, and specialty products under well-known brands like ARM & HAMMER, TROJAN, and OXICLEAN. It generates revenue primarily through its Consumer Domestic segment — which accounts for roughly 70% of sales — selling products across laundry, oral care, sexual wellness, and home cleaning categories. The company's key advantage is its portfolio of leading value brands that dominate niche categories — like ARM & HAMMER in baking soda and TROJAN in condoms — giving it pricing power and shelf space.
Colgate-Palmolive is a global consumer goods company that manufactures and sells oral care, personal care, home care, and pet nutrition products. It generates revenue primarily from its Oral, Personal and Home Care segment — which contributes roughly 85% of sales — and its Pet Nutrition segment, which makes up the remaining 15%. The company's competitive advantage lies in its powerful global brand portfolio, particularly the dominant Colgate brand in oral care, and its extensive distribution network reaching over 200 countries.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CL leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
CL is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.4B annually — 3.3x CHD's $6.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.9% (CHD) to 10.5% (CL).
| Metric | CHDChurch & Dwight C… | CLColgate-Palmolive… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.2B | $20.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $3.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $737M | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.7% | +60.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +21.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +17.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.9% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.1% | -105.1% |
Valuation Metrics
At 34.7x trailing earnings, CHD trades at a 8% valuation discount to CL's 37.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CL's 17.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHD's 20.1x.
| Metric | CHDChurch & Dwight C… | CLColgate-Palmolive… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24.8B | $79.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26.6B | $86.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.72x | 37.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.81x | 25.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.09x | 17.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.00x | 3.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.40x | 220.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.71x | 21.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CL delivers a 5.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $18 for CHD. CHD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CL's 21.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHD scores 7/9 vs CL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CHDChurch & Dwight C… | CLColgate-Palmolive… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.4% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.3% | +13.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.9% | +43.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.4% | +41.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 21.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $6.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $409M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $8.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.22x | 12.37x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CL five years ago would be worth $14,394 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,027 for CHD. Over the past 12 months, CL leads with a +11.0% total return vs CHD's -4.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CL at 12.8% vs CHD's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CHDChurch & Dwight C… | CLColgate-Palmolive… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.3% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.6% | +11.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.3% | +43.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.3% | +43.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +152.7% | +78.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.9% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CL is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHD's 0.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CL currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs CHD's 90.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CHDChurch & Dwight C… | CLColgate-Palmolive… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $116.46 | $100.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $81.33 | $74.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.0% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.1 | 68.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CHD as "Buy" and CL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -6.2% upside for CHD (target: $98) vs -6.7% for CL (target: $92). For income investors, CL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.27% vs CHD's 1.12%.
| Metric | CHDChurch & Dwight C… | CLColgate-Palmolive… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $98.40 | $92.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 23 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +1.5% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Church & Dwight Co.… (CHD) | 100 | 129.86 | +29.9% |
| Colgate-Palmolive C… (CL) | 100 | 126.85 | +26.8% |
Colgate-Palmolive C… (CL) returned +44% over 5 years vs Church & Dwight Co.… (CHD)'s +40%. A $10,000 investment in CL 5 years ago would be worth $14,394 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Church & Dwight Co.… (CHD) | $3.5B | $6.2B | +77.6% |
| Colgate-Palmolive C… (CL) | $15.2B | $20.4B | +34.1% |
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.'s revenue grew from $3.5B (2016) to $6.2B (2025) — a 6.6% CAGR. Colgate-Palmolive Company's revenue grew from $15.2B (2016) to $20.4B (2025) — a 3.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Church & Dwight Co.… (CHD) | 13.1% | 11.9% | -9.6% |
| Colgate-Palmolive C… (CL) | 16.1% | 10.5% | -34.9% |
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.'s net margin went from 13% (2016) to 12% (2025). Colgate-Palmolive Company's net margin went from 16% (2016) to 10% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Church & Dwight Co.… (CHD) | 17.3 | 27.8 | +60.7% |
| Colgate-Palmolive C… (CL) | 33.1 | 30 | -9.4% |
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. has traded in a 17x–48x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x. Colgate-Palmolive Company has traded in a 22x–37x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~38x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Church & Dwight Co.… (CHD) | 1.75 | 3.02 | +72.6% |
| Colgate-Palmolive C… (CL) | 2.72 | 2.63 | -3.3% |
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.75 (2016) to $3.02 (2025) — a 6% CAGR. Colgate-Palmolive Company's EPS grew from $2.72 (2016) to $2.63 (2025) — a -0% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+25% vs 2021). Colgate-Palmolive Company generated $4B FCF in 2025 (+32% vs 2021).
CHD vs CL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHD or CL a better buy right now?
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) offers the better valuation at 34.7x trailing P/E (27.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHD or CL?
On trailing P/E, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) is the cheapest at 34.7x versus Colgate-Palmolive Company at 37.7x. On forward P/E, Colgate-Palmolive Company is actually cheaper at 25.7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHD or CL?
Over the past 5 years, Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) delivered a total return of +43.9%, compared to +40.3% for Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD). A $10,000 investment in CL five years ago would be worth approximately $14K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHD returned +152.7% versus CL's +78.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHD or CL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.02β versus Church & Dwight Co., Inc.'s 0.04β — meaning CHD is approximately 124% more volatile than CL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 22% for Colgate-Palmolive Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CHD or CL?
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) is the more profitable company, earning 11.9% net margin versus 10.5% for Colgate-Palmolive Company — meaning it keeps 11.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CL leads at 21.3% versus 17.4% for CHD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CL leads at 60.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CHD or CL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) trades at 25.7x forward P/E versus 27.8x for Church & Dwight Co., Inc. — 2.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHD: -6.2% to $98.40.
07Which pays a better dividend — CHD or CL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) offers the highest yield at 2.3%, versus 1.1% for Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD).
08Is CHD or CL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.04), 1.1% yield, +152.7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHD: +152.7%, CL: +78.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CHD and CL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.