CHDN vs DKNG vs FLUT vs PENN vs CZR

For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.

(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) offers the better valuation at 16. 6x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Churchill Downs Incorporated is actually cheaper at 12.

7x.

Over the past 5 years, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) delivered a total return of -6.

7%, compared to -79. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHDN returned +313. 9% versus FLUT's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

70β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning PENN is approximately 88% more volatile than CHDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 138% versus 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.

(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

0% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHDN leads at 25. 2% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) trades at 12.

7x forward P/E versus 104. 4x for DraftKings Inc. — 91. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 103. 7% to $206. 13.

In this comparison, CHDN (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. DKNG, FLUT, PENN, CZR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

70), +313. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHDN: +313. 9%, PENN: +11. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CHDN is a small-cap deep-value stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.