Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CHDN vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
CHDN vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $6.43B | $2.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.95B | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $388M | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 33.8% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.2x | 22.9x |
| Total Debt | $5.20B | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $289M | $687M |
CHDN vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Churchill Downs Inc… (CHDN) | 100 | 139.1 | +39.1% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHDN vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHDN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth -6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 343.6% 10Y total return vs PENN's 13.6%
PENN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.9% vs CHDN's +0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 22.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.2% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs PENN's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.9% vs CHDN's +0.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 9.4% vs 1.8% |
CHDN vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CHDN vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHDN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PENN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.0B annually — 2.4x CHDN's $2.9B. CHDN is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, PENN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $932M | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $388M | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $734M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.7% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PENN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CHDN's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PENN's 13.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.4B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.3B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.34x | -2.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.24x | 22.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.17x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.62x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.20x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.24x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.99x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHDN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHDN delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. PENN carries lower financial leverage with a 4.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHDN's 4.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHDN scores 6/9 vs PENN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +35.7% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.1% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.92x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.9B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $289M | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.25x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PENN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHDN five years ago would be worth $9,424 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,996 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, PENN leads with a +7.9% total return vs CHDN's +0.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PENN at -13.5% vs CHDN's -13.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.6% | +12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.5% | +7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.0% | -35.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.8% | -80.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +343.6% | +13.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.8% | -13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHDN and PENN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHDN is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PENN currently trades 81.3% from its 52-week high vs CHDN's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $118.46 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.24 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +81.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 58.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CHDN as "Buy" and PENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.0% upside for CHDN (target: $145) vs 18.7% for PENN (target: $20). CHDN is the only dividend payer here at 0.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $144.84 | $19.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.43 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.7% | +15.8% |
CHDN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PENN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CHDN vs PENN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHDN or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the stronger pick with 7.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHDN or PENN?
On forward P/E, Churchill Downs Incorporated is actually cheaper at 13.
2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHDN or PENN?
Over the past 5 years, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) delivered a total return of -5.
8%, compared to -80. 0% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHDN returned +343. 6% versus PENN's +13. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHDN or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 92% more volatile than CHDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 5% for Churchill Downs Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHDN or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is pulling ahead at 7.
0% versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Churchill Downs Incorporated grew EPS -6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHDN leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHDN or PENN?
Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
0% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHDN leads at 25. 2% versus 3. 9% for PENN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHDN leads at 33. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHDN or PENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) trades at 13.
2x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHDN: 57. 0% to $144. 84.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHDN or PENN?
In this comparison, CHDN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. PENN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CHDN or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), +343. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHDN: +343. 6%, PENN: +13. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHDN and PENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHDN is a small-cap deep-value stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.