CHDN vs RRR

For growth investors, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the stronger pick with 7.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR). Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the cheapest at 16.

7x versus Red Rock Resorts, Inc. at 17. 2x. On forward P/E, Churchill Downs Incorporated is actually cheaper at 12. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Red Rock Resorts, Inc.

(RRR) delivered a total return of +68. 3%, compared to -9. 8% for Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHDN returned +317. 2% versus RRR's +251. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

70β versus Red Rock Resorts, Inc. 's 0. 98β — meaning RRR is approximately 41% more volatile than CHDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 5% for Churchill Downs Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is pulling ahead at 7.

0% versus 3. 7% for Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Red Rock Resorts, Inc. grew EPS 23. 3% year-over-year, compared to -6. 3% for Churchill Downs Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHDN leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

0% net margin versus 9. 3% for Red Rock Resorts, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RRR leads at 29. 7% versus 25. 2% for CHDN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) trades at 12.

8x forward P/E versus 17. 4x for Red Rock Resorts, Inc. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHDN: 63. 0% to $144. 84.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Red Rock Resorts, Inc. (RRR) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 0. 5% for Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Red Rock Resorts, Inc.

(RRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 98), 2. 2% yield, +251. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RRR: +251. 9%, CHDN: +317. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

RRR pays a dividend while CHDN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.