REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CHMI vs MITT vs AGNC vs MFA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
CHMI vs MITT vs AGNC vs MFA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $94M | $249M | $9.62B | $995M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $43M | $493M | $3.46B | $650M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $34M | $838M | $135M |
| Gross Margin | 80.8% | 94.2% | 100.0% | 59.3% |
| Operating Margin | 65.9% | 93.3% | 107.1% | 41.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.2x | 6.9x | 7.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.29B | $8.10B | $64M | $10.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $55M | $76M | $505M | $213M |
CHMI vs MITT vs AGNC vs MFA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cherry Hill Mortgag… (CHMI) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| TPG Mortgage Invest… (MITT) | 100 | 106.2 | +6.2% |
| AGNC Investment Cor… (AGNC) | 100 | 82.8 | -17.2% |
| MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) | 100 | 144.2 | +44.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHMI vs MITT vs AGNC vs MFA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHMI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 49.8% margin vs MITT's 6.8%
- 1.4% ROA vs MITT's 0.4%, ROIC 4.9% vs 4.5%
MITT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AGNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 384.7%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.4%
- 46.9% 10Y total return vs MFA's 7.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 0.7%
- 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs MITT's 14.4%
MFA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 18.4%
- Beta 0.77, yield 18.4%, current ratio 2.18x
- 18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MITT's 10.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs MITT's 14.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 7.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 49.8% margin vs MITT's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs MITT's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MITT's 10.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs CHMI's +2.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs MITT's 0.4%, ROIC 4.9% vs 4.5% |
CHMI vs MITT vs AGNC vs MFA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CHMI vs MITT vs AGNC vs MFA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
MITT leads 1 • MFA leads 1 • CHMI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 79.7x CHMI's $43M. CHMI is the more profitable business, keeping 49.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MITT's 6.8%. On growth, AGNC holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $43M | $493M | $3.5B | $650M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $457M | $3.7B | $268M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $34M | $838M | $135M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $31M | $68M | $604M | $91M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.8% | +94.2% | +100.0% | +59.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +65.9% | +93.3% | +107.1% | +41.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +49.8% | +6.8% | +24.2% | +20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +71.5% | +13.8% | +17.5% | +14.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +20.9% | +2.5% | +118.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.8% | -2.3% | +84.6% | -103.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MITT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, MFA trades at a 50% valuation discount to AGNC's 11.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGNC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHMI's 22.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $94M | $249M | $9.6B | $995M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $8.3B | $9.2B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.70x | 8.71x | 11.53x | 5.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.20x | 6.87x | 7.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.51x | 18.25x | 2.42x | 17.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 0.53x | 1.97x | 1.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.43x | 0.86x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.18x | 111.86x | 13.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHMI delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $6 for MITT. AGNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MITT's 14.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGNC scores 5/9 vs MITT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | +6.1% | +7.3% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +0.4% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +4.5% | +34.0% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +6.5% | +4.9% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.39x | 14.45x | 0.01x | 6.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $8.0B | -$441M | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $55M | $76M | $505M | $213M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $8.1B | $64M | $11.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.18x | 1.12x | 1.32x | 1.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MITT and AGNC and MFA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MFA five years ago would be worth $9,942 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,286 for CHMI. Over the past 12 months, AGNC leads with a +39.4% total return vs CHMI's +2.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MITT at 23.4% vs CHMI's -7.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.0% | -5.6% | +2.5% | +6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.4% | +29.0% | +39.4% | +19.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.7% | +87.9% | +58.3% | +34.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.1% | -3.5% | -2.2% | -0.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.0% | -16.9% | +46.9% | +7.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.4% | +23.4% | +16.5% | +10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AGNC and MFA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MITT's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MFA currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs CHMI's 77.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.90x | 0.74x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.31 | $9.27 | $12.19 | $10.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.17 | $6.52 | $8.65 | $8.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.6% | +84.6% | +87.9% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 50.5 | 52.1 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 194K | 277K | 18.2M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
MFA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MITT as "Buy", AGNC as "Hold", MFA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.8% upside for MITT (target: $10) vs 3.8% for AGNC (target: $11). For income investors, MFA offers the higher dividend yield at 18.36% vs MITT's 10.04%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.63 | $11.13 | $10.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 35 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +10.0% | +14.7% | +18.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.79 | $1.58 | $1.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
AGNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MITT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CHMI vs MITT vs AGNC vs MFA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHMI or MITT or AGNC or MFA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is the stronger pick with 384. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 4% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT). MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHMI or MITT or AGNC or MFA?
On trailing P/E, MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus AGNC Investment Corp. at 11. 5x. On forward P/E, AGNC Investment Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHMI or MITT or AGNC or MFA?
Over the past 5 years, MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) delivered a total return of -0. 6%, compared to -37. 1% for Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation (CHMI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGNC returned +46. 9% versus MITT's -16. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHMI or MITT or AGNC or MFA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc's 0. 90β — meaning MITT is approximately 21% more volatile than AGNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 14% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHMI or MITT or AGNC or MFA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is pulling ahead at 384. 7% versus 14. 4% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGNC Investment Corp. grew EPS 1760% year-over-year, compared to -246. 4% for Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHMI leads at 37. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHMI or MITT or AGNC or MFA?
MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 2% net margin versus 6. 5% for Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MITT leads at 96. 9% versus 55. 9% for CHMI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGNC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHMI or MITT or AGNC or MFA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 7. 2x for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MITT: 22. 8% to $9. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHMI or MITT or AGNC or MFA?
In this comparison, MFA (18.
4% yield), AGNC (14. 7% yield), MITT (10. 0% yield) pay a dividend. CHMI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CHMI or MITT or AGNC or MFA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 14. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGNC: +46. 9%, CHMI: +5. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHMI and MITT and AGNC and MFA?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHMI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MITT is a small-cap deep-value stock; AGNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MFA is a small-cap high-growth stock. MITT, AGNC, MFA pay a dividend while CHMI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.