Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CHT vs CSCO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CHT
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • TW
Market Cap$33.99B
5Y Perf.+18.3%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$382.42B
5Y Perf.+101.9%

CHT vs CSCO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CHT logoCHT
CSCO logoCSCO
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesCommunication Equipment
Market Cap$33.99B$382.42B
Revenue (TTM)$235.08B$59.05B
Net Income (TTM)$38.69B$11.08B
Gross Margin36.6%64.4%
Operating Margin20.7%23.0%
Forward P/E0.8x23.2x
Total Debt$38.02B$29.64B
Cash & Equiv.$37.09B$9.47B

CHT vs CSCOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CHT
CSCO
StockMay 20May 26Return
Chunghwa Telecom Co… (CHT)100118.3+18.3%
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)100201.9+101.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CHT vs CSCO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CSCO leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CHT
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
The Income Pick

CHT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 3.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.20, Low D/E 9.5%, current ratio 1.48x
  • Beta 0.20, yield 3.7%, current ratio 1.48x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
The Growth Play

CSCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 0.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
  • 318.3% 10Y total return vs CHT's 64.4%
  • 5.3% revenue growth vs CHT's 3.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCSCO logoCSCO5.3% revenue growth vs CHT's 3.3%
ValueCHT logoCHTLower P/E (0.8x vs 23.2x)
Quality / MarginsCSCO logoCSCO18.8% margin vs CHT's 16.5%
Stability / SafetyCHT logoCHTBeta 0.20 vs CSCO's 0.90, lower leverage
DividendsCHT logoCHT3.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CSCO's 1.7%
Momentum (1Y)CSCO logoCSCO+64.5% vs CHT's +7.4%
Efficiency (ROA)CSCO logoCSCO9.0% ROA vs CHT's 7.3%, ROIC 13.0% vs 9.1%

CHT vs CSCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
FY 2021
Mobile Services
33.8%$58.0B
Sales Of Product
25.0%$42.9B
Local Telephone And Domestic Long Distance Telephone Services
14.9%$25.7B
Broadband Access And Domestic Leased Line Services
13.4%$23.0B
Data Communications Internet Services
13.0%$22.3B
CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Networking
44.5%$28.3B
Service
34.5%$22.0B
Security
12.7%$8.1B
Collaboration
6.5%$4.2B
Observability
1.7%$1.1B

CHT vs CSCO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCSCOLAGGINGCHT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CHT is the larger business by revenue, generating $235.1B annually — 4.0x CSCO's $59.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 18.8% (CSCO) to 16.5% (CHT). On growth, CSCO holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCHT logoCHTChunghwa Telecom …CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$235.1B$59.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$87.5B$16.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$38.7B$11.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$51.3B$12.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+36.6%+64.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.7%+23.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.5%+18.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.8%+21.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.4%+9.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.4%+29.5%
CSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CHT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 27.5x trailing earnings, CHT trades at a 27% valuation discount to CSCO's 37.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHT's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSCO's 27.5x.

MetricCHT logoCHTChunghwa Telecom …CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
Market CapShares × price$34.0B$382.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$34.0B$402.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS27.53x37.87x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.83x23.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate9.11x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.69x27.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.51x6.75x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.66x8.24x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.49x28.78x
CHT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CSCO delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $10 for CHT. CHT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSCO's 0.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHT scores 9/9 vs CSCO's 8/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCHT logoCHTChunghwa Telecom …CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.8%+23.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.3%+9.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.1%+13.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.7%+13.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–998
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.09x0.63x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$929M$20.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$37.1B$9.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$38.0B$29.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense130.38x9.64x
CSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CSCO five years ago would be worth $19,643 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,104 for CHT. Over the past 12 months, CSCO leads with a +64.5% total return vs CHT's +7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSCO at 29.8% vs CHT's 4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCHT logoCHTChunghwa Telecom …CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.0%+28.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+7.4%+64.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+15.1%+118.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.0%+96.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+64.4%+318.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+4.8%+29.8%
CSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CHT and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CHT is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSCO's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSCO currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs CHT's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCHT logoCHTChunghwa Telecom …CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.20x0.90x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$47.03$97.02
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$39.28$59.43
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.2%+99.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.165.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded183K19.0M
Evenly matched — CHT and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CHT and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates CHT as "Sell" and CSCO as "Buy". For income investors, CHT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.66% vs CSCO's 1.67%.

MetricCHT logoCHTChunghwa Telecom …CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellSellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$99.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts473
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.7%+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises515
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$50.30$1.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.9%
Evenly matched — CHT and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CSCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CHT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CHT vs CSCO: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CHT or CSCO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. (CHT). Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. (CHT) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) a "Buy" — based on 73 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CHT or CSCO?

On trailing P/E, Chunghwa Telecom Co.

, Ltd. (CHT) is the cheapest at 27. 5x versus Cisco Systems, Inc. at 37. 9x. On forward P/E, Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CHT or CSCO?

Over the past 5 years, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) delivered a total return of +96. 4%, compared to +21. 0% for Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. (CHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSCO returned +318. 3% versus CHT's +64. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CHT or CSCO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chunghwa Telecom Co.

, Ltd. (CHT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus Cisco Systems, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning CSCO is approximately 360% more volatile than CHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. (CHT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 63% for Cisco Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CHT or CSCO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus 3. 3% for Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. (CHT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 4. 2% year-over-year, compared to 0. 4% for Cisco Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSCO leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CHT or CSCO?

Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus 16. 4% for Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSCO leads at 20. 8% versus 20. 6% for CHT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSCO leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CHT or CSCO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Chunghwa Telecom Co.

, Ltd. (CHT) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 23. 2x for Cisco Systems, Inc. — 22. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CHT or CSCO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Chunghwa Telecom Co. , Ltd. (CHT) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 1. 7% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO).

09

Is CHT or CSCO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chunghwa Telecom Co.

, Ltd. (CHT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHT: +64. 4%, CSCO: +318. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CHT and CSCO?

These companies operate in different sectors (CHT (Communication Services) and CSCO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CHT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CHT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSCO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CHT and CSCO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CHT: 1.4% · CSCO: 9.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(CHT: 16.5% · CSCO: 18.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CHT: 27.5x · CSCO: 37.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.