CI
Cigna Corporation
Medical - Healthcare Plans
Market Cap$74.35B
5Y Perf.+42.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CI vs LLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
Drug Manufacturers - General
Market Cap$932.64B
5Y Perf.+545.4%
CI vs LLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CI | LLY |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $74.35B | $932.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $277.94B | $72.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.29B | $25.27B |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 45.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 28.6x |
| Total Debt | $31.46B | $42.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7.68B | $7.16B |
CI vs LLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CI
LLY
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cigna Corporation (CI) | 100 | 142.9 | +42.9% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 645.4 | +545.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CI vs LLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LLY leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Cigna Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CI
Cigna Corporation
The Insurance Pick
CI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 75.1%, current ratio 0.85x
- Beta 0.35, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.85x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
The Growth Play
LLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
- 12.7% 10Y total return vs CI's 135.9%
- 44.7% revenue growth vs CI's 11.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LLY | 44.7% revenue growth vs CI's 11.3% |
| Value | CI | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 28.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | LLY | 35.0% margin vs CI's 2.3% |
| Stability / Safety | CI | Beta 0.35 vs LLY's 0.71, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CI | 2.1% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs LLY's 0.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | LLY | +28.2% vs CI's -13.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LLY | 22.7% ROA vs CI's 4.1%, ROIC 41.8% vs 10.4% |
CI vs LLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
CI vs LLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLLYLAGGINGCI
CICigna Corporation
1leads
LLYEli Lilly and Company
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LLY6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CI6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LLY5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LLY5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CI is the larger business by revenue, generating $277.9B annually — 3.8x LLY's $72.2B. LLY is the more profitable business, keeping 35.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CI's 2.3%. On growth, LLY holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CICigna Corporation | LLYEli Lilly and Com… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $277.9B | $72.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12.1B | $34.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.3B | $25.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.7B | $13.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +45.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +35.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.1% | +169.9% |
LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, CI trades at a 70% valuation discount to LLY's 43.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CI's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LLY's 31.0x.
| Metric | CICigna Corporation | LLYEli Lilly and Com… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74.3B | $932.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $98.1B | $968.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.72x | 43.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.30x | 28.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.34x | 30.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 14.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.79x | 33.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.86x | 103.95x |
CI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY delivers a 101.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $15 for CI. CI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.75x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LLY's 1.60x.
| Metric | CICigna Corporation | LLYEli Lilly and Com… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.1% | +101.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +41.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +46.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.75x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23.8B | $35.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.7B | $7.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $31.5B | $42.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.77x | 35.68x |
LLY leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LLY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $52,144 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,971 for CI. Over the past 12 months, LLY leads with a +28.2% total return vs CI's -13.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LLY at 32.4% vs CI's 4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CICigna Corporation | LLYEli Lilly and Com… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.6% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.7% | +28.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.9% | +131.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.7% | +421.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.9% | +1271.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.1% | +32.4% |
LLY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CI and LLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CI is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LLY's 0.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LLY currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs CI's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CICigna Corporation | LLYEli Lilly and Com… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $338.89 | $1133.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $239.51 | $623.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.2% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.9 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.6M |
Evenly matched — CI and LLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CI and LLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CI as "Buy" and LLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.5% upside for LLY (target: $1258) vs 16.3% for CI (target: $328). For income investors, CI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.15% vs LLY's 0.61%.
| Metric | CICigna Corporation | LLYEli Lilly and Com… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $328.00 | $1258.47 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.06 | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.9% | +0.4% |
Evenly matched — CI and LLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
LLY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallEli Lilly and Company (LLY)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CI vs LLY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CI or LLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger pick with 44.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 3% for Cigna Corporation (CI). Cigna Corporation (CI) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cigna Corporation (CI) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CI or LLY?
On trailing P/E, Cigna Corporation (CI) is the cheapest at 12.
7x versus Eli Lilly and Company at 43. 0x. On forward P/E, Cigna Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CI or LLY?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +421.
4%, compared to +19. 7% for Cigna Corporation (CI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1272% versus CI's +135. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CI or LLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cigna Corporation (CI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Eli Lilly and Company's 0. 71β — meaning LLY is approximately 100% more volatile than CI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cigna Corporation (CI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 75% versus 160% for Eli Lilly and Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CI or LLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is pulling ahead at 44.
7% versus 11. 3% for Cigna Corporation (CI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eli Lilly and Company grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to 82. 9% for Cigna Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LLY leads at 31. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CI or LLY?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus 2. 2% for Cigna Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus 3. 3% for CI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LLY leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CI or LLY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cigna Corporation (CI) trades at 9.
3x forward P/E versus 28. 6x for Eli Lilly and Company — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LLY: 27. 5% to $1258. 47.
08Which pays a better dividend — CI or LLY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cigna Corporation (CI) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 6% for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY).
09Is CI or LLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 0. 6% yield, +1272% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1272%, CI: +135. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CI and LLY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LLY is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CI: 4.6% · LLY: 55.5%)Net Margin>
%
(CI: 2.3% · LLY: 35.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CI: 12.7x · LLY: 43.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.