Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CIEN vs ADTN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
CIEN vs ADTN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $77.06B | $1.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.12B | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $229M | $-30M |
| Gross Margin | 40.6% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | -0.5% |
| Forward P/E | 88.6x | 31.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.58B | $245M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.09B | $96M |
CIEN vs ADTN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ciena Corporation (CIEN) | 100 | 985.8 | +885.8% |
| ADTRAN Holdings, In… (ADTN) | 100 | 134.2 | +34.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIEN vs ADTN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 46.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 33.0% 10Y total return vs ADTN's -4.5%
- 18.8% revenue growth vs ADTN's 17.5%
ADTN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.91
- Lower volatility, beta 1.91, Low D/E 47.2%, current ratio 1.76x
- Beta 1.91, current ratio 1.76x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs ADTN's 17.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.2x vs 88.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.5% margin vs ADTN's -2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.91 vs CIEN's 2.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.5% vs ADTN's +93.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs ADTN's -2.5%, ROIC 6.9% vs -1.7% |
CIEN vs ADTN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CIEN vs ADTN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 4.6x ADTN's $1.1B. CIEN is the more profitable business, keeping 4.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ADTN's -2.6%. On growth, CIEN holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.1B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $571M | $43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $229M | -$30M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $742M | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +38.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | -0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.1% | +15.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +92.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ADTN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ADTN's 18.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CIEN's 171.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $77.1B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $77.5B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 640.88x | -26.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 88.60x | 31.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 171.89x | 17.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.16x | 1.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 28.99x | 2.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 115.82x | 12.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CIEN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIEN delivers a 8.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ADTN. ADTN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIEN's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIEN scores 8/9 vs ADTN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | -5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | -1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | -1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $490M | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $96M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $245M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.94x | 0.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIEN five years ago would be worth $106,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,380 for ADTN. Over the past 12 months, CIEN leads with a +647.2% total return vs ADTN's +93.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIEN at 131.2% vs ADTN's 20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +121.4% | +76.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +647.2% | +93.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1135.8% | +76.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +960.9% | -6.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3300.4% | -4.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +131.2% | +20.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CIEN and ADTN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADTN is the less volatile stock with a 1.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIEN's 2.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIEN currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs ADTN's 81.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.46x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $562.00 | $18.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.67 | $7.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.9% | +81.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.5 | 74.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CIEN as "Buy" and ADTN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for ADTN (target: $18) vs -38.7% for CIEN (target: $334).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $334.17 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
CIEN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ADTN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CIEN vs ADTN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIEN or ADTN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ciena Corporation (CIEN) is the stronger pick with 18.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 5% for ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. (ADTN). Ciena Corporation (CIEN) offers the better valuation at 640. 9x trailing P/E (88. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ciena Corporation (CIEN) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIEN or ADTN?
On forward P/E, ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 31. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIEN or ADTN?
Over the past 5 years, Ciena Corporation (CIEN) delivered a total return of +960.
9%, compared to -6. 2% for ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. (ADTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIEN returned +33. 0% versus ADTN's -4. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIEN or ADTN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.
(ADTN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 91β versus Ciena Corporation's 2. 46β — meaning CIEN is approximately 29% more volatile than ADTN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. (ADTN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 58% for Ciena Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CIEN or ADTN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ciena Corporation (CIEN) is pulling ahead at 18.
8% versus 17. 5% for ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. (ADTN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 89. 9% year-over-year, compared to 46. 6% for Ciena Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIEN leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIEN or ADTN?
Ciena Corporation (CIEN) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
6% net margin versus -4. 2% for ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIEN leads at 6. 5% versus -1. 4% for ADTN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIEN leads at 41. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIEN or ADTN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.
(ADTN) trades at 31. 2x forward P/E versus 88. 6x for Ciena Corporation — 57. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADTN: 17. 6% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIEN or ADTN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CIEN or ADTN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.
(ADTN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Ciena Corporation (CIEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 46 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADTN: -4. 5%, CIEN: +33. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIEN and ADTN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.