REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CIM vs MITT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
CIM vs MITT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $249M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $499M | $493M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $34M |
| Gross Margin | 93.3% | 94.2% |
| Operating Margin | 64.2% | 93.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.4x | 7.2x |
| Total Debt | $13.07B | $8.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $279M | $76M |
CIM vs MITT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chimera Investment … (CIM) | 100 | 54.3 | -45.7% |
| TPG Mortgage Invest… (MITT) | 100 | 106.2 | +6.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIM vs MITT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 218.2%, EPS growth 150.0%
- 19.1% 10Y total return vs MITT's -16.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, current ratio 0.07x
MITT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 10.0%
- Beta 0.90, yield 10.0%, current ratio 0.09x
- 6.8% margin vs CIM's 3.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 218.2% FFO/revenue growth vs MITT's 14.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 7.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs CIM's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs MITT's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CIM's 7.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs CIM's +25.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs CIM's 0.1%, ROIC 4.5% vs 4.1% |
CIM vs MITT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CIM vs MITT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MITT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIM and MITT operate at a comparable scale, with $499M and $493M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.8% (MITT) to 3.9% (CIM). On growth, MITT holds the edge at +20.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $499M | $493M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $434M | $457M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$54M | $68M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.3% | +94.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | +93.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +13.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +20.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -144.1% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CIM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CIM trades at a 43% valuation discount to MITT's 8.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIM's 18.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MITT's 18.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $249M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.9B | $8.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.92x | 8.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.41x | 7.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.10x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.04x | 18.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.38x | 0.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MITT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MITT delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $1 for CIM. CIM carries lower financial leverage with a 5.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MITT's 14.45x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.08x | 14.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.8B | $8.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $279M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.1B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.42x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MITT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MITT five years ago would be worth $9,650 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,252 for CIM. Over the past 12 months, MITT leads with a +29.0% total return vs CIM's +25.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MITT at 23.4% vs CIM's 5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.8% | -5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.7% | +29.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.2% | +87.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.5% | -3.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.1% | -16.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.7% | +23.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CIM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIM is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MITT's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIM currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs MITT's 84.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.88 | $9.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.67 | $6.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 728K | 277K |
Analyst Outlook
MITT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CIM as "Hold" and MITT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.8% upside for MITT (target: $10) vs 5.2% for CIM (target: $14). For income investors, MITT offers the higher dividend yield at 10.04% vs CIM's 7.57%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.25 | $9.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.6% | +10.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.02 | $0.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MITT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CIM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
CIM vs MITT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIM or MITT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the stronger pick with 218.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 4% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT). Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIM or MITT?
On trailing P/E, Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc at 8. 7x. On forward P/E, Chimera Investment Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIM or MITT?
Over the past 5 years, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) delivered a total return of -3.
5%, compared to -37. 5% for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIM returned +19. 1% versus MITT's -16. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIM or MITT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
81β versus TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc's 0. 90β — meaning MITT is approximately 11% more volatile than CIM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 14% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CIM or MITT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is pulling ahead at 218.
2% versus 14. 4% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chimera Investment Corporation grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to -26. 8% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIM or MITT?
Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the more profitable company, earning 28.
1% net margin versus 10. 3% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MITT leads at 96. 9% versus 93. 2% for CIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIM leads at 94. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIM or MITT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) trades at 6.
4x forward P/E versus 7. 2x for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MITT: 22. 8% to $9. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIM or MITT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) offers the highest yield at 10. 0%, versus 7. 6% for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM).
09Is CIM or MITT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
81), 7. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIM: +19. 1%, MITT: -16. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIM and MITT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MITT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.