Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CIM vs RKT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.13B
5Y Perf.-49.2%
RKT
Rocket Companies, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$39.90B
5Y Perf.-49.5%

CIM vs RKT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CIM logoCIM
RKT logoRKT
IndustryREIT - MortgageFinancial - Mortgages
Market Cap$1.13B$39.90B
Revenue (TTM)$499M$6.88B
Net Income (TTM)$19M$-68M
Gross Margin93.3%91.6%
Operating Margin64.2%8.7%
Forward P/E6.4x19.3x
Total Debt$13.07B$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$279M$2.70B

CIM vs RKTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CIM
RKT
StockAug 20May 26Return
Chimera Investment … (CIM)10050.8-49.2%
Rocket Companies, I… (RKT)10050.5-49.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CIM vs RKT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CIM leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play

CIM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 7.6%
  • Rev growth 218.2%, EPS growth 150.0%
  • 19.1% 10Y total return vs RKT's -20.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
RKT
Rocket Companies, Inc.
The Financial Play

In this particular matchup, RKT is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCIM logoCIM218.2% FFO/revenue growth vs RKT's 27.4%
ValueCIM logoCIMLower P/E (6.4x vs 19.3x)
Quality / MarginsCIM logoCIM3.9% margin vs RKT's -1.0%
Stability / SafetyCIM logoCIMBeta 0.81 vs RKT's 1.77
DividendsCIM logoCIM7.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CIM logoCIM+25.7% vs RKT's +21.6%
Efficiency (ROA)CIM logoCIM0.1% ROA vs RKT's -0.2%, ROIC 4.1% vs 2.0%

CIM vs RKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CIMChimera Investment Corporation
FY 2018
Investment Advisory Services
100.0%$7M
RKTRocket Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Direct To Customer Segment
87.8%$4.8B
Partner Network Segment
12.2%$668M

CIM vs RKT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCIMLAGGINGRKT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CIM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

RKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 13.8x CIM's $499M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.9% (CIM) to -1.0% (RKT).

MetricCIM logoCIMChimera Investmen…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$499M$6.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$434M$639M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$19M-$68M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$54M-$4.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+93.3%+91.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+64.2%+8.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.9%-1.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-10.9%-58.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-144.1%-89.6%
CIM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CIM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CIM's 18.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RKT's 41.8x.

MetricCIM logoCIMChimera Investmen…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$39.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13.9B$37.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS4.92x-282.60x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.41x19.30x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.10x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.04x41.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.38x5.80x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.44x0.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
CIM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CIM leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

CIM delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-1 for RKT. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIM scores 3/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricCIM logoCIMChimera Investmen…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.8%-0.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.1%-0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.1%+2.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.3%+1.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–932
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage5.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$12.8B-$2.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$279M$2.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13.1B$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.42x0.43x
CIM leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CIM and RKT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RKT five years ago would be worth $8,811 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,252 for CIM. Over the past 12 months, CIM leads with a +25.7% total return vs RKT's +21.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RKT at 21.0% vs CIM's 5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCIM logoCIMChimera Investmen…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.8%-28.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+25.7%+21.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18.2%+77.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.5%-11.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+19.1%-20.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+5.7%+21.0%
Evenly matched — CIM and RKT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CIM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CIM is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RKT's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIM currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs RKT's 58.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCIM logoCIMChimera Investmen…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x1.77x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.88$24.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.67$11.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.0%+58.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.345.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded728K25.0M
CIM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

RKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates CIM as "Hold" and RKT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.1% upside for RKT (target: $22) vs 5.2% for CIM (target: $14). CIM is the only dividend payer here at 7.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCIM logoCIMChimera Investmen…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.25$21.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts1625
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
RKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CIM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RKT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallChimera Investment Corporat… (CIM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CIM vs RKT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CIM or RKT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the stronger pick with 218.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 4% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CIM or RKT?

On forward P/E, Chimera Investment Corporation is actually cheaper at 6.

4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CIM or RKT?

Over the past 5 years, Rocket Companies, Inc.

(RKT) delivered a total return of -11. 9%, compared to -37. 5% for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIM returned +19. 1% versus RKT's -20. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CIM or RKT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

81β versus Rocket Companies, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RKT is approximately 119% more volatile than CIM relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which is growing faster — CIM or RKT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is pulling ahead at 218.

2% versus 27. 4% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chimera Investment Corporation grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to -123. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CIM or RKT?

Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the more profitable company, earning 28.

1% net margin versus -1. 0% for Rocket Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIM leads at 93. 2% versus 8. 7% for RKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIM leads at 94. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CIM or RKT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) trades at 6.

4x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Rocket Companies, Inc. — 12. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RKT: 53. 1% to $21. 63.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CIM or RKT?

In this comparison, CIM (7.

6% yield) pays a dividend. RKT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CIM or RKT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

81), 7. 6% yield). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIM: +19. 1%, RKT: -20. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CIM and RKT?

These companies operate in different sectors (CIM (Real Estate) and RKT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

CIM pays a dividend while RKT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CIM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 55%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RKT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CIM and RKT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CIM: -100.0% · RKT: 27.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.