REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CIM vs RKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
CIM vs RKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $39.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $499M | $6.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $-68M |
| Gross Margin | 93.3% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | 64.2% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | 6.4x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $13.07B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $279M | $2.70B |
CIM vs RKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chimera Investment … (CIM) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 50.5 | -49.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIM vs RKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 7.6%
- Rev growth 218.2%, EPS growth 150.0%
- 19.1% 10Y total return vs RKT's -20.7%
In this particular matchup, RKT is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 218.2% FFO/revenue growth vs RKT's 27.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.9% margin vs RKT's -1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs RKT's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 7.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.7% vs RKT's +21.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs RKT's -0.2%, ROIC 4.1% vs 2.0% |
CIM vs RKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CIM vs RKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 13.8x CIM's $499M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.9% (CIM) to -1.0% (RKT).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $499M | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $434M | $639M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | -$68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$54M | -$4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.3% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | -1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | -58.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -144.1% | -89.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CIM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CIM's 18.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RKT's 41.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $39.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.9B | $37.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.92x | -282.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.41x | 19.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.10x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.04x | 41.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.38x | 5.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CIM leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIM delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-1 for RKT. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIM scores 3/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.08x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.8B | -$2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $279M | $2.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.1B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.42x | 0.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CIM and RKT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RKT five years ago would be worth $8,811 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,252 for CIM. Over the past 12 months, CIM leads with a +25.7% total return vs RKT's +21.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RKT at 21.0% vs CIM's 5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.8% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.7% | +21.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.2% | +77.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.5% | -11.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.1% | -20.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.7% | +21.0% |
Risk & Volatility
CIM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIM is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RKT's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIM currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs RKT's 58.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.88 | $24.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.67 | $11.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +58.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 728K | 25.0M |
Analyst Outlook
RKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CIM as "Hold" and RKT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.1% upside for RKT (target: $22) vs 5.2% for CIM (target: $14). CIM is the only dividend payer here at 7.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.25 | $21.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CIM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RKT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CIM vs RKT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIM or RKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the stronger pick with 218.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 4% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIM or RKT?
On forward P/E, Chimera Investment Corporation is actually cheaper at 6.
4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIM or RKT?
Over the past 5 years, Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) delivered a total return of -11. 9%, compared to -37. 5% for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIM returned +19. 1% versus RKT's -20. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIM or RKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
81β versus Rocket Companies, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RKT is approximately 119% more volatile than CIM relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CIM or RKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is pulling ahead at 218.
2% versus 27. 4% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chimera Investment Corporation grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to -123. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIM or RKT?
Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the more profitable company, earning 28.
1% net margin versus -1. 0% for Rocket Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIM leads at 93. 2% versus 8. 7% for RKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIM leads at 94. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIM or RKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) trades at 6.
4x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Rocket Companies, Inc. — 12. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RKT: 53. 1% to $21. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIM or RKT?
In this comparison, CIM (7.
6% yield) pays a dividend. RKT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CIM or RKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
81), 7. 6% yield). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIM: +19. 1%, RKT: -20. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIM and RKT?
These companies operate in different sectors (CIM (Real Estate) and RKT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
CIM pays a dividend while RKT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.