Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CKX vs ILPT vs IIPR vs PLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
CKX vs ILPT vs IIPR vs PLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $22M | $527M | $1.62B | $132.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $897K | $453M | $263M | $8.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $475K | $-54M | $120M | $3.21B |
| Gross Margin | 93.9% | 10.9% | 60.3% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 34.5% | 33.1% | 46.7% | 47.0% |
| Forward P/E | 89.3x | — | 13.2x | 41.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $4.22B | $394M | $31.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $183M | $48M | $1.32B |
CKX vs ILPT vs IIPR vs PLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CKX Lands, Inc. (CKX) | 100 | 134.3 | +34.3% |
| Industrial Logistic… (ILPT) | 100 | 42.2 | -57.8% |
| Innovative Industri… (IIPR) | 100 | 69.3 | -30.7% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CKX vs ILPT vs IIPR vs PLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CKX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 2.4%, EPS growth 71.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, current ratio 36.26x
- 2.4% revenue growth vs IIPR's -13.8%
- 52.9% margin vs ILPT's -11.9%
ILPT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +177.7% vs CKX's +4.1%
IIPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 3.52 vs PLD's 3.83
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 41.4x), PEG 3.52 vs 3.83
- 13.5% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 5.1% ROA vs ILPT's -1.0%, ROIC 4.3% vs 2.2%
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 2.6%
- 259.1% 10Y total return vs IIPR's 436.4%
- Beta 0.73, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.92x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.4% revenue growth vs IIPR's -13.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 41.4x), PEG 3.52 vs 3.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.9% margin vs ILPT's -11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs ILPT's 1.62 | |
| Dividends | 13.5% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +177.7% vs CKX's +4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs ILPT's -1.0%, ROIC 4.3% vs 2.2% |
CKX vs ILPT vs IIPR vs PLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CKX vs ILPT vs IIPR vs PLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
CKX leads 1 • IIPR leads 1 • PLD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CKX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 9737.8x CKX's $897,333. CKX is the more profitable business, keeping 52.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ILPT's -11.9%. On growth, CKX holds the edge at +35.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $897,333 | $453M | $263M | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $313,061 | $306M | $197M | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $475,078 | -$54M | $120M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $433,651 | $65M | $144M | $5.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.9% | +10.9% | +60.3% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +33.1% | +46.7% | +47.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | -11.9% | +45.6% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | +14.4% | +54.7% | +59.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.8% | +4.0% | -3.8% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +57.6% | -1.0% | -24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ILPT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, IIPR trades at a 84% valuation discount to CKX's 89.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLD offers better value at 3.28x vs IIPR's 3.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $527M | $1.6B | $132.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $4.6B | $2.0B | $162.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 89.33x | -7.91x | 14.40x | 35.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 13.17x | 41.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.85x | 3.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 153.19x | 14.59x | 9.91x | 23.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.47x | 1.17x | 6.08x | 16.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 0.58x | 0.87x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 107.49x | 8.69x | 9.26x | 26.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ILPT. IIPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILPT's 4.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CKX scores 5/9 vs IIPR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | -5.9% | +6.4% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -1.0% | +5.1% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | +2.2% | +4.3% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | +3.3% | +5.8% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.69x | 0.21x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $4.0B | $346M | $30.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $183M | $48M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $4.2B | $394M | $31.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.61x | 6.67x | 5.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ILPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLD five years ago would be worth $13,773 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,803 for ILPT. Over the past 12 months, ILPT leads with a +177.7% total return vs CKX's +4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ILPT at 62.2% vs CKX's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.2% | +44.8% | +18.3% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.1% | +177.7% | +20.3% | +39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.4% | +326.6% | +14.1% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | -62.0% | -50.0% | +37.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.8% | -41.0% | +436.4% | +259.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.0% | +62.2% | +4.5% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CKX and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CKX is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ILPT's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLD currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs CKX's 80.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 1.62x | 0.92x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.25 | $8.19 | $61.40 | $145.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.66 | $2.84 | $44.58 | $103.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +96.6% | +92.2% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 71.4 | 59.3 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 312K | 303K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IIPR and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ILPT as "Buy", IIPR as "Hold", PLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1.5% upside for PLD (target: $144) vs -22.3% for IIPR (target: $44). For income investors, IIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 13.46% vs ILPT's 1.53%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.40 | $44.00 | $144.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 11 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | +13.5% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 9 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 | $7.62 | $3.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +0.1% | +1.2% | +0.0% |
ILPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CKX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CKX vs ILPT vs IIPR vs PLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CKX or ILPT or IIPR or PLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CKX Lands, Inc.
(CKX) is the stronger pick with 2. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CKX or ILPT or IIPR or PLD?
On trailing P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus CKX Lands, Inc. at 89. 3x. On forward P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. wins at 3. 52x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 83x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CKX or ILPT or IIPR or PLD?
Over the past 5 years, Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) delivered a total return of +37. 7%, compared to -62. 0% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +436. 4% versus ILPT's -41. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CKX or ILPT or IIPR or PLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CKX Lands, Inc.
(CKX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's 1. 62β — meaning ILPT is approximately 435% more volatile than CKX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CKX or ILPT or IIPR or PLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CKX Lands, Inc.
(CKX) is pulling ahead at 2. 4% versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CKX Lands, Inc. grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -28. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CKX leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CKX or ILPT or IIPR or PLD?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus -14. 7% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 7. 7% for CKX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CKX leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CKX or ILPT or IIPR or PLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 52x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 83x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for Prologis, Inc. — 28. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLD: 1. 5% to $144. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — CKX or ILPT or IIPR or PLD?
In this comparison, IIPR (13.
5% yield), PLD (2. 6% yield), ILPT (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CKX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CKX or ILPT or IIPR or PLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 2. 6% yield, +259. 1% 10Y return). Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLD: +259. 1%, ILPT: -41. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CKX and ILPT and IIPR and PLD?
These companies operate in different sectors (CKX (Energy) and ILPT (Real Estate) and IIPR (Real Estate) and PLD (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CKX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ILPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ILPT, IIPR, PLD pay a dividend while CKX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.