Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs ILPT vs JBGS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Office
CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs ILPT vs JBGS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | REIT - Retail | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $22M | $281M | $170M | $527M | $912M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $897K | $65M | $145M | $453M | $506M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $475K | $-415K | $7M | $-54M | $-112M |
| Gross Margin | 93.9% | -4.1% | 81.4% | 10.9% | -10.2% |
| Operating Margin | 34.5% | 28.0% | 54.3% | 33.1% | -0.5% |
| Forward P/E | 89.3x | 59.3x | 19.4x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $394M | $672M | $4.22B | $2.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $5M | $48M | $183M | $75M |
CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs ILPT vs JBGS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CKX Lands, Inc. (CKX) | 100 | 98.1 | -1.9% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 121.1 | +21.1% |
| Strawberry Fields R… (STRW) | 100 | 125.7 | +25.7% |
| Industrial Logistic… (ILPT) | 100 | 143.8 | +43.8% |
| JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) | 100 | 83.2 | -16.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs ILPT vs JBGS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CKX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, current ratio 36.26x
- 52.9% margin vs JBGS's -22.2%
- Beta 0.30 vs ILPT's 1.62
- 2.5% ROA vs JBGS's -2.5%, ROIC 0.7% vs -0.1%
PINE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
STRW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 4.4%
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 46.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.4%
- 47.8% 10Y total return vs PINE's 38.3%
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs JBGS's -8.9%
ILPT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +177.7% vs CKX's +4.1%
JBGS is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.63, yield 4.7%, current ratio 1.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs JBGS's -8.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.9% margin vs JBGS's -22.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs ILPT's 1.62 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JBGS's 4.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +177.7% vs CKX's +4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs JBGS's -2.5%, ROIC 0.7% vs -0.1% |
CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs ILPT vs JBGS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs ILPT vs JBGS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STRW leads in 2 of 6 categories
CKX leads 1 • ILPT leads 1 • PINE leads 0 • JBGS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CKX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBGS is the larger business by revenue, generating $506M annually — 563.4x CKX's $897,333. CKX is the more profitable business, keeping 52.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JBGS's -22.2%. On growth, CKX holds the edge at +35.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $897,333 | $65M | $145M | $453M | $506M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $313,061 | $45M | $123M | $306M | $129M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $475,078 | -$415,000 | $7M | -$54M | -$112M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $433,651 | -$46M | $88M | $65M | $93M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.9% | -4.1% | +81.4% | +10.9% | -10.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +28.0% | +54.3% | +33.1% | -0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | -0.6% | +4.8% | -11.9% | -22.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | -71.7% | +60.7% | +14.4% | +18.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.8% | +29.6% | +34.8% | +4.0% | +5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +185.7% | +6.7% | +57.6% | +42.9% |
Valuation Metrics
STRW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, STRW trades at a 75% valuation discount to CKX's 89.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STRW's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CKX's 153.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $281M | $170M | $527M | $912M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $671M | $793M | $4.6B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 89.33x | -89.27x | 22.72x | -7.91x | -7.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 59.32x | 19.44x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 153.19x | 14.63x | 8.31x | 14.59x | 18.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.47x | 4.65x | 1.45x | 1.17x | 1.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 1.01x | 1.10x | 0.58x | 0.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 107.49x | — | 4.81x | 8.69x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
STRW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STRW delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-6 for JBGS. PINE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STRW's 8.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRW scores 7/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | -0.1% | +11.2% | -5.9% | -6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -0.1% | +0.8% | -1.0% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | +2.2% | +7.2% | +2.2% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | +2.8% | +9.0% | +3.3% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.31x | 8.04x | 4.69x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $390M | $623M | $4.0B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $5M | $48M | $183M | $75M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $394M | $672M | $4.2B | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.82x | 1.82x | 0.61x | -0.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ILPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STRW five years ago would be worth $14,780 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,803 for ILPT. Over the past 12 months, ILPT leads with a +177.7% total return vs CKX's +4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ILPT at 62.2% vs CKX's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.2% | +18.8% | +1.0% | +44.8% | -7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.1% | +37.3% | +29.7% | +177.7% | +5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.4% | +46.6% | +109.3% | +326.6% | +23.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +41.2% | +47.8% | -62.0% | -39.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.8% | +38.3% | +47.8% | -41.0% | -28.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.0% | +13.6% | +27.9% | +62.2% | +7.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CKX and ILPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CKX is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ILPT's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILPT currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs JBGS's 63.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.33x | 0.69x | 1.62x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.25 | $20.80 | $14.00 | $8.19 | $24.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.66 | $13.10 | $9.46 | $2.84 | $14.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +94.4% | +92.5% | +96.6% | +63.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 54.0 | 51.6 | 71.4 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 176K | 23K | 312K | 599K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STRW and ILPT and JBGS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PINE as "Buy", STRW as "Buy", ILPT as "Buy", JBGS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.4% upside for STRW (target: $15) vs -6.4% for ILPT (target: $7). For income investors, JBGS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.65% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.75 | $15.33 | $7.40 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +4.4% | +1.5% | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | $0.57 | $0.12 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +3.1% | +1.5% | +0.1% | +48.6% |
STRW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CKX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CKX vs PINE vs STRW vs ILPT vs JBGS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CKX or PINE or STRW or ILPT or JBGS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) is the stronger pick with 17.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CKX or PINE or STRW or ILPT or JBGS?
On trailing P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) is the cheapest at 22.
7x versus CKX Lands, Inc. at 89. 3x. On forward P/E, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC is actually cheaper at 19. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CKX or PINE or STRW or ILPT or JBGS?
Over the past 5 years, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) delivered a total return of +47.
8%, compared to -62. 0% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STRW returned +47. 8% versus ILPT's -41. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CKX or PINE or STRW or ILPT or JBGS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CKX Lands, Inc.
(CKX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's 1. 62β — meaning ILPT is approximately 435% more volatile than CKX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 131% versus 8% for Strawberry Fields REIT LLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CKX or PINE or STRW or ILPT or JBGS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) is pulling ahead at 17.
3% versus -8. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CKX Lands, Inc. grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CKX leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CKX or PINE or STRW or ILPT or JBGS?
CKX Lands, Inc.
(CKX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus -27. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STRW leads at 52. 4% versus -1. 3% for JBGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CKX leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CKX or PINE or STRW or ILPT or JBGS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Strawberry Fields REIT LLC (STRW) trades at 19.
4x forward P/E versus 59. 3x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 39. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STRW: 18. 4% to $15. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — CKX or PINE or STRW or ILPT or JBGS?
In this comparison, JBGS (4.
7% yield), STRW (4. 4% yield), ILPT (1. 5% yield), PINE (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CKX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CKX or PINE or STRW or ILPT or JBGS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), 4. 7% yield). Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JBGS: -28. 5%, ILPT: -41. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CKX and PINE and STRW and ILPT and JBGS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CKX (Energy) and PINE (Real Estate) and STRW (Real Estate) and ILPT (Real Estate) and JBGS (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CKX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; STRW is a small-cap high-growth stock; ILPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JBGS is a small-cap income-oriented stock. STRW, ILPT, JBGS pay a dividend while CKX, PINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.