Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CKX vs WPP vs OMC vs PINE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyAMEX • US
Market Cap$22M
5Y Perf.+34.3%
WPP
WPP plc

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$4.05B
5Y Perf.-50.4%
OMC
Omnicom Group Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$23.87B
5Y Perf.+40.4%
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.

REIT - Retail

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$281M
5Y Perf.+58.8%

CKX vs WPP vs OMC vs PINE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CKX logoCKX
WPP logoWPP
OMC logoOMC
PINE logoPINE
IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionAdvertising AgenciesAdvertising AgenciesREIT - Retail
Market Cap$22M$4.05B$23.87B$281M
Revenue (TTM)$897K$29.03B$19.82B$65M
Net Income (TTM)$475K$584M$63M$-415K
Gross Margin93.9%16.3%16.8%-4.1%
Operating Margin34.5%6.7%13.7%28.0%
Forward P/E89.3x7.5x7.2x59.3x
Total Debt$0.00$6.35B$12.78B$394M
Cash & Equiv.$3M$2.64B$6.88B$5M

CKX vs WPP vs OMC vs PINELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CKX
WPP
OMC
PINE
StockMay 20May 26Return
CKX Lands, Inc. (CKX)100134.3+34.3%
WPP plc (WPP)10049.6-50.4%
Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC)100140.4+40.4%
Alpine Income Prope… (PINE)100158.8+58.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CKX vs WPP vs OMC vs PINE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CKX leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. WPP and OMC also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CKX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.30, current ratio 36.26x
  • Beta 0.30, current ratio 36.26x
  • 52.9% margin vs PINE's -0.6%
  • Beta 0.30 vs WPP's 1.08
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
WPP
WPP plc
The Income Pick

WPP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 14.0%
  • 14.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs OMC's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
OMC
Omnicom Group Inc.
The Value Play

OMC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (7.2x vs 59.3x)
Best for: value
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

PINE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth -257.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.2%
  • 38.3% 10Y total return vs OMC's 23.5%
  • 15.9% FFO/revenue growth vs WPP's -0.7%
  • +37.3% vs WPP's -46.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPINE logoPINE15.9% FFO/revenue growth vs WPP's -0.7%
ValueOMC logoOMCLower P/E (7.2x vs 59.3x)
Quality / MarginsCKX logoCKX52.9% margin vs PINE's -0.6%
Stability / SafetyCKX logoCKXBeta 0.30 vs WPP's 1.08
DividendsWPP logoWPP14.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs OMC's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)PINE logoPINE+37.3% vs WPP's -46.1%
Efficiency (ROA)CKX logoCKX2.5% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 0.7% vs 2.2%

CKX vs WPP vs OMC vs PINE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CKXCKX Lands, Inc.
FY 2024
Oil and Gas
94.9%$417,846
Timber
5.1%$22,225
WPPWPP plc

Segment breakdown not available.

OMCOmnicom Group Inc.
FY 2025
Advertising
72.2%$10.0B
Public relations
11.6%$1.6B
Health Care
9.9%$1.4B
Experiential
6.2%$863M
PINEAlpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
FY 2025
Income Properties
100.0%$49M

CKX vs WPP vs OMC vs PINE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWPPLAGGINGPINE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CKX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

WPP is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.0B annually — 32348.7x CKX's $897,333. CKX is the more profitable business, keeping 52.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -0.6%. On growth, OMC holds the edge at +69.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCKX logoCKXCKX Lands, Inc.WPP logoWPPWPP plcOMC logoOMCOmnicom Group Inc.PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$897,333$29.0B$19.8B$65M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$313,061$2.6B$3.1B$45M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$475,078$584M$63M-$415,000
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$433,651$1.7B$3.0B-$46M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+93.9%+16.3%+16.8%-4.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+34.5%+6.7%+13.7%+28.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+52.9%+2.0%+0.3%-0.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+48.3%+5.9%+15.1%-71.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+35.8%-7.8%+69.2%+29.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.1%-78.9%+40.7%+185.7%
CKX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

WPP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.6x trailing earnings, WPP trades at a 94% valuation discount to CKX's 89.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WPP's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CKX's 153.2x.

MetricCKX logoCKXCKX Lands, Inc.WPP logoWPPWPP plcOMC logoOMCOmnicom Group Inc.PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…
Market CapShares × price$22M$4.0B$23.9B$281M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$19M$9.1B$29.8B$671M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS89.33x5.63x-284.89x-89.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.48x7.24x59.32x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple153.19x3.68x10.40x14.63x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue14.47x0.20x1.38x4.65x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.19x0.81x1.21x1.01x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF107.49x2.54x8.56x
WPP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

OMC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

WPP delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-0 for PINE. OMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.98x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WPP's 1.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WPP scores 7/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCKX logoCKXCKX Lands, Inc.WPP logoWPPWPP plcOMC logoOMCOmnicom Group Inc.PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.5%+17.1%+0.7%-0.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.5%+2.5%+0.2%-0.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.7%+12.5%+14.5%+2.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.6%+13.0%+13.5%+2.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95722
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.70x0.98x1.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M$3.7B$5.9B$390M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$2.6B$6.9B$5M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$6.3B$12.8B$394M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.37x2.51x0.82x
OMC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PINE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PINE five years ago would be worth $14,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,289 for WPP. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +37.3% total return vs WPP's -46.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINE at 13.6% vs WPP's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCKX logoCKXCKX Lands, Inc.WPP logoWPPWPP plcOMC logoOMCOmnicom Group Inc.PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.2%-18.2%-4.4%+18.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+4.1%-46.1%+5.3%+37.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+12.4%-54.3%-7.0%+46.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.4%-57.1%+7.2%+41.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-8.8%-59.0%+23.5%+38.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+4.0%-23.0%-2.4%+13.6%
PINE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CKX and PINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CKX is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WPP's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PINE currently trades 94.4% from its 52-week high vs WPP's 45.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCKX logoCKXCKX Lands, Inc.WPP logoWPPWPP plcOMC logoOMCOmnicom Group Inc.PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.30x1.08x0.60x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.25$40.95$87.17$20.80
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.66$14.81$66.33$13.10
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+80.9%+45.8%+88.2%+94.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.863.350.154.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3K616K4.3M176K
Evenly matched — CKX and PINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WPP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: WPP as "Hold", OMC as "Hold", PINE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.8% upside for OMC (target: $94) vs 5.7% for PINE (target: $21). For income investors, WPP offers the higher dividend yield at 14.05% vs PINE's 0.18%.

MetricCKX logoCKXCKX Lands, Inc.WPP logoWPPWPP plcOMC logoOMCOmnicom Group Inc.PINE logoPINEAlpine Income Pro…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$93.67$20.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts133412
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.0%+3.5%+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1400
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.94$2.68$0.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.9%+2.8%+3.0%+3.1%
WPP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WPP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). CKX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallWPP plc (WPP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CKX vs WPP vs OMC vs PINE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CKX or WPP or OMC or PINE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.

(PINE) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 7% for WPP plc (WPP). WPP plc (WPP) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CKX or WPP or OMC or PINE?

On trailing P/E, WPP plc (WPP) is the cheapest at 5.

6x versus CKX Lands, Inc. at 89. 3x. On forward P/E, Omnicom Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CKX or WPP or OMC or PINE?

Over the past 5 years, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.

(PINE) delivered a total return of +41. 2%, compared to -57. 1% for WPP plc (WPP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PINE returned +38. 3% versus WPP's -59. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CKX or WPP or OMC or PINE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CKX Lands, Inc.

(CKX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus WPP plc's 1. 08β — meaning WPP is approximately 256% more volatile than CKX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 98% versus 170% for WPP plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CKX or WPP or OMC or PINE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.

(PINE) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -0. 7% for WPP plc (WPP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WPP plc grew EPS 390. 0% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CKX leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CKX or WPP or OMC or PINE?

CKX Lands, Inc.

(CKX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PINE leads at 30. 5% versus 7. 7% for CKX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CKX leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CKX or WPP or OMC or PINE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Omnicom Group Inc.

(OMC) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 59. 3x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 52. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OMC: 21. 8% to $93. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CKX or WPP or OMC or PINE?

In this comparison, WPP (14.

0% yield), OMC (3. 5% yield), PINE (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CKX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CKX or WPP or OMC or PINE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Omnicom Group Inc.

(OMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMC: +23. 5%, WPP: -59. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CKX and WPP and OMC and PINE?

These companies operate in different sectors (CKX (Energy) and WPP (Communication Services) and OMC (Communication Services) and PINE (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CKX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WPP is a small-cap deep-value stock; OMC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock. WPP, OMC pay a dividend while CKX, PINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CKX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Net Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WPP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 5.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OMC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 34%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PINE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CKX and WPP and OMC and PINE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CKX: 35.8% · WPP: -7.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(CKX: 52.9% · WPP: 2.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CKX: 89.3x · WPP: 5.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.