Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CLIK vs SPIR vs ASTS vs QFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Financial - Credit Services
CLIK vs SPIR vs ASTS vs QFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $6M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $3.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $72M | $71M | $17.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $803K | $-25.02B | $-342M | $6.89B |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | -121.4% | -405.7% | 43.9% |
| Forward P/E | 2.9x | 10.0x | — | 0.5x |
| Total Debt | $630K | $8.76B | $32M | $1.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $483K | $24.81B | $2.34B | $4.45B |
CLIK vs SPIR vs ASTS vs QFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Click Holdings Limi… (CLIK) | 100 | 4.5 | -95.5% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 162.8 | +62.8% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 274.4 | +174.4% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 40.3 | -59.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLIK vs SPIR vs ASTS vs QFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLIK is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 50.7% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 114.9% vs -0.1%
SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs QFIN's 16.1%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
- +158.1% vs CLIK's -69.3%
QFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.20, yield 9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 6.8%, current ratio 2.45x
- Beta 1.20, yield 9.3%, current ratio 2.45x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.5% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs SPIR's 2.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs CLIK's -69.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 50.7% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 114.9% vs -0.1% |
CLIK vs SPIR vs ASTS vs QFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CLIK vs SPIR vs ASTS vs QFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CLIK leads 1 • ASTS leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 3034.3x CLIK's $6M. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $72M | $71M | $17.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$74M | -$237M | $8.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$25.0B | -$342M | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | $10.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +61.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | -121.4% | -4.1% | +43.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | -349.6% | -4.8% | +36.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | -227.0% | -16.0% | +53.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -26.9% | +27.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +59.5% | -55.6% | -9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
QFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, QFIN trades at a 79% valuation discount to SPIR's 10.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QFIN's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLIK's 7.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $513.8B | $16.8B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.95x | 10.01x | -48.76x | 2.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 0.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.12x | — | — | 2.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 1.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.79x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.28x | — | — | 2.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLIK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLIK delivers a 5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLIK's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLIK scores 7/9 vs ASTS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | -88.4% | -21.1% | +28.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +50.7% | -47.3% | -12.6% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +114.9% | -0.1% | -47.1% | +23.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | -0.1% | -10.0% | +35.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $147,495 | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | -$2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $482,588 | $24.8B | $2.3B | $4.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $630,083 | $8.8B | $32M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 283.38x | 9.20x | -21.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $279 for CLIK. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs CLIK's -69.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs CLIK's -69.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -58.5% | +106.4% | -21.7% | -22.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -69.3% | +73.1% | +158.1% | -63.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | +0.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | -79.6% | +688.2% | -19.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | -78.8% | +568.8% | +16.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -69.7% | +43.9% | +134.8% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPIR and QFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QFIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 68.3% from its 52-week high vs CLIK's 6.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.54x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.20 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $47.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.32 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $12.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.5% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +28.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 1.6M | 14.9M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", QFIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for QFIN (target: $28) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17). QFIN is the only dividend payer here at 9.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $103.65 | $28.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 7 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $8.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +11.6% |
QFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CLIK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CLIK vs SPIR vs ASTS vs QFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLIK or SPIR or ASTS or QFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLIK or SPIR or ASTS or QFIN?
On trailing P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Spire Global, Inc. at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLIK or SPIR or ASTS or QFIN?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -97. 2% for Click Holdings Limited (CLIK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus CLIK's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLIK or SPIR or ASTS or QFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 145% more volatile than QFIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 156% for Click Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLIK or SPIR or ASTS or QFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 30. 9% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLIK or SPIR or ASTS or QFIN?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QFIN leads at 61. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLIK or SPIR or ASTS or QFIN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 113.
1% to $28. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLIK or SPIR or ASTS or QFIN?
In this comparison, QFIN (9.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CLIK, SPIR, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLIK or SPIR or ASTS or QFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), 9. 3% yield). Click Holdings Limited (CLIK) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QFIN: +16. 1%, CLIK: -97. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLIK and SPIR and ASTS and QFIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CLIK (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and QFIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CLIK is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. QFIN pays a dividend while CLIK, SPIR, ASTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.