REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CLPR vs NXRT vs ELME vs NHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Office
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
CLPR vs NXRT vs ELME vs NHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Office | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $50M | $758M | $193M | $3.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $153M | $252M | $0.00 | $403M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $-32M | $-154M | $148M |
| Gross Margin | 80.2% | 91.1% | — | 61.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | 11.5% | — | 48.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.56B | $520M | $1.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $14M | $1.33B | $20M |
CLPR vs NXRT vs ELME vs NHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) | 100 | 42.1 | -57.9% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.3 | -6.7% |
| Elme Communities (ELME) | 100 | 9.9 | -90.1% |
| National Health Inv… (NHI) | 100 | 133.1 | +33.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLPR vs NXRT vs ELME vs NHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLPR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ELME's 33.3%
ELME is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 33.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.47, yield 33.3%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.47 vs CLPR's 0.95
NHI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth -3.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.8%
- 60.5% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 211.0%
- 12.9% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0%
- 36.8% margin vs CLPR's -13.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.8% margin vs CLPR's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs CLPR's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ELME's 33.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.4% vs NXRT's -15.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 5.6% vs -15.3% |
CLPR vs NXRT vs ELME vs NHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CLPR vs NXRT vs ELME vs NHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NHI leads in 4 of 6 categories
CLPR leads 1 • NXRT leads 0 • ELME leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NHI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NHI and ELME operate at a comparable scale, with $403M and $0 in trailing revenue. NHI is the more profitable business, keeping 36.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLPR's -13.0%. On growth, NHI holds the edge at +29.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $153M | $252M | $0 | $403M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $125M | -$44M | $282M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | -$32M | -$154M | $148M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $79M | $62M | $226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.2% | +91.1% | — | +61.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +11.5% | — | +48.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | -12.7% | — | +36.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +31.2% | — | +56.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +0.5% | -4.0% | +29.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | 0.0% | -6.6% | +10.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CLPR's 0.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXRT's 18.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $50M | $758M | $193M | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $2.3B | -$619M | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.62x | -23.69x | -1.24x | 24.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 21.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.55x | 18.61x | — | 16.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 3.01x | — | 9.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.52x | 0.80x | 2.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.22x | 9.06x | 3.10x | 16.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NHI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NHI delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-19 for ELME. NHI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NHI scores 6/9 vs ELME's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -10.1% | -18.9% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | -1.7% | -8.3% | +5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +1.1% | -15.3% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +1.5% | -10.1% | +8.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 5.18x | 2.18x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | $1.5B | -$812M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $14M | $1.3B | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.6B | $520M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.47x | -3.82x | 3.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NHI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NHI five years ago would be worth $12,946 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,832 for CLPR. Over the past 12 months, ELME leads with a +8.4% total return vs NXRT's -15.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NHI at 19.6% vs CLPR's -8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.0% | +2.7% | -3.9% | -2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.0% | -15.5% | +8.4% | +1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.1% | -15.4% | +13.6% | +71.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.7% | -21.7% | -14.3% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | +211.0% | -10.7% | +60.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.4% | -5.4% | +4.3% | +19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NHI is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLPR's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NHI currently trades 81.2% from its 52-week high vs ELME's 12.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.62x | 0.47x | -0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.61 | $38.30 | $17.68 | $90.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.83 | $23.79 | $1.98 | $68.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.5% | +77.9% | +12.3% | +81.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 69.2 | 49.0 | 23.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 70K | 219K | 1.2M | 330K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXRT as "Hold", ELME as "Hold", NHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 775.6% upside for ELME (target: $19) vs -9.5% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, ELME offers the higher dividend yield at 33.33% vs NHI's 4.88%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $19.00 | $85.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 8 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.0% | +7.1% | +33.3% | +4.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.43 | $2.11 | $0.72 | $3.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NHI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLPR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CLPR vs NXRT vs ELME vs NHI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLPR or NXRT or ELME or NHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). National Health Investors, Inc. (NHI) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CLPR or NXRT or ELME or NHI?
Over the past 5 years, National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to -41. 7% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 0% versus CLPR's -51. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CLPR or NXRT or ELME or NHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus Clipper Realty Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning CLPR is approximately -1230% more volatile than NHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Health Investors, Inc. (NHI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 76% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CLPR or NXRT or ELME or NHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Health Investors, Inc. grew EPS -3. 5% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NHI leads at 10. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CLPR or NXRT or ELME or NHI?
National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 6% net margin versus -13. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NHI leads at 51. 5% versus 0. 0% for ELME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CLPR or NXRT or ELME or NHI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ELME: 775.
6% to $19. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CLPR or NXRT or ELME or NHI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Elme Communities (ELME) offers the highest yield at 33. 3%, versus 4. 9% for National Health Investors, Inc. (NHI).
08Is CLPR or NXRT or ELME or NHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08), 4. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NHI: +60. 5%, CLPR: -51. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CLPR and NXRT and ELME and NHI?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.