Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CMCSA vs CHTR vs T vs CABO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
CMCSA vs CHTR vs T vs CABO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $96.34B | $19.82B | $178.43B | $316M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $125.28B | $54.64B | $126.52B | $1.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18.60B | $5.13B | $21.41B | $-260M |
| Gross Margin | 61.7% | 43.3% | 79.7% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 24.1% | 19.4% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | 3.7x | 11.1x | 2.4x |
| Total Debt | $110.44B | $97.12B | $173.99B | $3.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9.48B | $477M | $18.23B | $153M |
CMCSA vs CHTR vs T vs CABO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
| Charter Communicati… (CHTR) | 100 | 28.8 | -71.2% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 100 | 109.7 | +9.7% |
| Cable One, Inc. (CABO) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMCSA vs CHTR vs T vs CABO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.88x
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- Beta 0.21 vs CABO's 0.42, lower leverage
CHTR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.20 vs CMCSA's 0.40
T is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 104.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.3%
- 42.4% 10Y total return vs CMCSA's 16.0%
- 2.7% revenue growth vs CABO's -4.9%
- 16.9% margin vs CABO's -17.7%
CABO is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (2.4x vs 11.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.7% revenue growth vs CABO's -4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.4x vs 11.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.9% margin vs CABO's -17.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs CABO's 0.42, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs CABO's 5.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.3% vs CABO's -69.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs CABO's -4.6%, ROIC 8.2% vs 6.1% |
CMCSA vs CHTR vs T vs CABO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMCSA vs CHTR vs T vs CABO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
T leads in 2 of 6 categories
CABO leads 1 • CMCSA leads 0 • CHTR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CMCSA and T and CABO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
T is the larger business by revenue, generating $126.5B annually — 85.8x CABO's $1.5B. T is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CABO's -17.7%. On growth, CMCSA holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $125.3B | $54.6B | $126.5B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35.4B | $20.9B | $45.1B | $730M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18.6B | $5.1B | $21.4B | -$260M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18.1B | $4.0B | $10.6B | -$167M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.7% | +43.3% | +79.7% | +39.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +24.1% | +19.4% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +9.4% | +16.9% | -17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +7.4% | +8.4% | -11.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.3% | -1.0% | +2.9% | -7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.6% | +8.9% | -11.5% | +12.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CABO leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, CHTR trades at a 49% valuation discount to T's 8.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CHTR offers better value at 0.23x vs CMCSA's 0.26x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $96.3B | $19.8B | $178.4B | $316M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $197.3B | $116.5B | $334.2B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.91x | 4.32x | 8.40x | -0.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.49x | 3.71x | 11.06x | 2.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.26x | 0.23x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.35x | 5.29x | 7.42x | 4.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 0.36x | 1.42x | 0.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.99x | 1.05x | 1.43x | 0.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.40x | 4.49x | 9.18x | 1.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CMCSA and CHTR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHTR delivers a 25.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-18 for CABO. CMCSA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHTR's 4.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CMCSA scores 7/9 vs CABO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.5% | +25.2% | +16.8% | -18.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | +3.3% | +5.1% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.2% | +8.6% | +6.7% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +9.6% | +6.8% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.13x | 4.73x | 1.35x | 2.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $101.0B | $96.6B | $155.8B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9.5B | $477M | $18.2B | $153M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $110.4B | $97.1B | $174.0B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.84x | 2.48x | 4.97x | 3.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
T leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in T five years ago would be worth $13,012 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $594 for CABO. Over the past 12 months, T leads with a -5.3% total return vs CABO's -69.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors T at 19.0% vs CABO's -51.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.3% | -25.2% | +6.3% | -46.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.5% | -61.1% | -5.3% | -69.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.9% | -55.3% | +68.7% | -88.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.7% | -76.8% | +30.1% | -94.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.0% | -26.5% | +42.4% | -71.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.5% | -23.6% | +19.0% | -51.3% |
Risk & Volatility
T leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
T is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CABO's 0.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. T currently trades 85.8% from its 52-week high vs CABO's 29.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.33x | -0.26x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.66 | $437.06 | $29.79 | $187.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.75 | $156.14 | $22.95 | $55.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.1% | +35.8% | +85.8% | +29.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.9 | 28.7 | 42.4 | 25.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28.4M | 2.3M | 33.7M | 150K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CMCSA and CABO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMCSA as "Buy", CHTR as "Buy", T as "Hold", CABO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 77.2% upside for CHTR (target: $277) vs 15.1% for T (target: $29). For income investors, CABO offers the higher dividend yield at 5.48% vs T's 4.46%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.87 | $277.40 | $29.42 | $80.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 60 | 55 | 62 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | — | +4.5% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 18 | — | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.35 | — | $1.14 | $3.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.4% | +25.9% | +2.5% | 0.0% |
T leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). CABO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CMCSA vs CHTR vs T vs CABO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMCSA or CHTR or T or CABO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AT&T Inc.
(T) is the stronger pick with 2. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Cable One, Inc. (CABO). Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (3. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) a "Buy" — based on 60 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMCSA or CHTR or T or CABO?
On trailing P/E, Charter Communications, Inc.
(CHTR) is the cheapest at 4. 3x versus AT&T Inc. at 8. 4x. On forward P/E, Cable One, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Charter Communications, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Comcast Corporation's 0. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMCSA or CHTR or T or CABO?
Over the past 5 years, AT&T Inc.
(T) delivered a total return of +30. 1%, compared to -94. 1% for Cable One, Inc. (CABO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: T returned +42. 4% versus CABO's -71. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMCSA or CHTR or T or CABO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AT&T Inc.
(T) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 26β versus Cable One, Inc. 's 0. 42β — meaning CABO is approximately -261% more volatile than T relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 113% versus 5% for Charter Communications, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMCSA or CHTR or T or CABO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AT&T Inc.
(T) is pulling ahead at 2. 7% versus -4. 9% for Cable One, Inc. (CABO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AT&T Inc. grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to -25. 5% for Cable One, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, T leads at 1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMCSA or CHTR or T or CABO?
AT&T Inc.
(T) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus -23. 7% for Cable One, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CABO leads at 26. 5% versus 16. 7% for CMCSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — T leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMCSA or CHTR or T or CABO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Comcast Corporation's 0. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Cable One, Inc. (CABO) trades at 2. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 1x for AT&T Inc. — 8. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHTR: 77. 2% to $277. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMCSA or CHTR or T or CABO?
In this comparison, CABO (5.
5% yield), CMCSA (5. 1% yield), T (4. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CHTR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMCSA or CHTR or T or CABO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AT&T Inc.
(T) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 26), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (T: +42. 4%, CHTR: -26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMCSA and CHTR and T and CABO?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CHTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; T is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CABO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CMCSA, T, CABO pay a dividend while CHTR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 1.7%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 23%
- Dividend Yield > 2.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.