REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CMCT vs CLPR vs NXRT vs PGRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Office
CMCT vs CLPR vs NXRT vs PGRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $6M | $50M | $756M | $1.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $117M | $153M | $252M | $723M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-39M | $-20M | $-32M | $-97M |
| Gross Margin | -10.3% | 80.2% | 91.1% | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 2.7% | 11.5% | 14.7% |
| Total Debt | $510M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $3.68B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $31M | $14M | $375M |
CMCT vs CLPR vs NXRT vs PGRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Media & Co… (CMCT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| Paramount Group, In… (PGRE) | 100 | 85.5 | -14.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMCT vs CLPR vs NXRT vs PGRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMCT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 100.0% yield, vs NXRT's 7.1%
CLPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth -88.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.7%
- 3.0% FFO/revenue growth vs CMCT's -6.3%
- Better valuation composite
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- 211.1% 10Y total return vs PGRE's -46.2%
- -12.7% margin vs CMCT's -33.4%
PGRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 91.7%, current ratio 7.76x
- Beta 0.31, yield 1.6%, current ratio 7.76x
- Beta 0.31 vs CMCT's 1.20, lower leverage
- +38.7% vs CMCT's -99.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% FFO/revenue growth vs CMCT's -6.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -12.7% margin vs CMCT's -33.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs CMCT's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs NXRT's 7.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.7% vs CMCT's -99.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.2% ROA vs CMCT's -4.5%, ROIC 1.5% vs 0.8% |
CMCT vs CLPR vs NXRT vs PGRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CMCT vs CLPR vs NXRT vs PGRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PGRE leads in 2 of 6 categories
NXRT leads 1 • CMCT leads 0 • CLPR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PGRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $723M annually — 6.2x CMCT's $117M. NXRT is the more profitable business, keeping -12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMCT's -33.4%. On growth, CMCT holds the edge at +3.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $117M | $153M | $252M | $723M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35M | $36M | $125M | $342M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$39M | -$20M | -$32M | -$97M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $7M | $79M | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | +80.2% | +91.1% | +57.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +2.7% | +11.5% | +14.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.4% | -13.0% | -12.7% | -13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.9% | +4.5% | +31.2% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | -2.6% | +0.5% | -11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.5% | -5.3% | 0.0% | -191.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CMCT and CLPR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CLPR's 0.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXRT's 18.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $50M | $756M | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $500M | $20M | $2.3B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.10x | -6.64x | -23.65x | -31.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.15x | 0.55x | 18.60x | 12.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.05x | 0.33x | 3.01x | 1.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | — | 2.52x | 0.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.23x | 9.05x | 5.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PGRE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PGRE delivers a -2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-13 for CMCT. PGRE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.92x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGRE scores 7/9 vs CMCT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.4% | — | -10.1% | -2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.5% | -1.6% | -1.7% | -1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.8% | +0.6% | +1.1% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +0.3% | +1.5% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.91x | — | 5.18x | 0.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $494M | -$31M | $1.5B | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $31M | $14M | $375M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $510M | $0 | $1.6B | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.03x | — | 0.47x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NXRT and PGRE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NXRT five years ago would be worth $7,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $402 for CMCT. Over the past 12 months, PGRE leads with a +38.7% total return vs CMCT's -99.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PGRE at 14.9% vs CMCT's -65.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.1% | -9.7% | +2.6% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.0% | -14.2% | -15.2% | +38.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | -23.0% | -15.5% | +51.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.0% | -42.4% | -23.0% | -30.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.4% | -50.9% | +211.1% | -46.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -65.5% | -8.3% | -5.5% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
PGRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PGRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMCT's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PGRE currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs CMCT's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 0.95x | 0.62x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1441.00 | $4.61 | $38.30 | $7.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.60 | $2.83 | $23.79 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.5% | +67.7% | +77.8% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 21.2 | 42.2 | 71.0 | 56.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 70K | 216K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CMCT and NXRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXRT as "Hold", PGRE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for PGRE (target: $12) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, CMCT offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs PGRE's 1.59%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $27.00 | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 10 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +13.9% | +7.1% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $23.89 | $0.43 | $2.11 | $0.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.0% |
PGRE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). NXRT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
CMCT vs CLPR vs NXRT vs PGRE: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMCT or CLPR or NXRT or PGRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clipper Realty Inc.
(CLPR) is the stronger pick with 3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 3% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT). Analysts rate NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CMCT or CLPR or NXRT or PGRE?
Over the past 5 years, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) delivered a total return of -23. 0%, compared to -96. 0% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus CMCT's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CMCT or CLPR or NXRT or PGRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paramount Group, Inc.
(PGRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation's 1. 20β — meaning CMCT is approximately 287% more volatile than PGRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Paramount Group, Inc. (PGRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 92% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CMCT or CLPR or NXRT or PGRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clipper Realty Inc.
(CLPR) is pulling ahead at 3. 0% versus -6. 3% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation grew EPS 98. 4% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPR leads at 5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CMCT or CLPR or NXRT or PGRE?
Paramount Group, Inc.
(PGRE) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 1% net margin versus -33. 4% for Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation — meaning it keeps -6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PGRE leads at 19. 6% versus 2. 7% for CLPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CMCT or CLPR or NXRT or PGRE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Creative Media & Community Trust Corporation (CMCT) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 1. 6% for Paramount Group, Inc. (PGRE).
07Is CMCT or CLPR or NXRT or PGRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Paramount Group, Inc.
(PGRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), 1. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PGRE: -46. 2%, CMCT: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CMCT and CLPR and NXRT and PGRE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CMCT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLPR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PGRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.