Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $42.32B | $3.53B | $2.82B | $11.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.14B | $709M | $1.49B | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.45B | $112M | $41M | $415M |
| Gross Margin | 36.1% | 82.6% | 7.5% | 18.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 28.0% | 4.3% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 28.6x | 28.3x | 54.4x | 28.1x |
| Total Debt | $9.85B | $1.33B | $902M | $1.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $351M | $239M | $360M | $135M |
CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipotle Mexican Gr… (CMG) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
| Wingstop Inc. (WING) | 100 | 106.4 | +6.4% |
| Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) | 100 | 126.3 | +26.3% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 342.1 | +242.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WING is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 15.8% margin vs SHAK's 2.8%
- 16.1% ROA vs SHAK's 2.2%, ROIC 46.0% vs 6.0%
SHAK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 354.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 15.4% revenue growth vs CMG's 5.4%
TXRH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 1.5%
- 331.7% 10Y total return vs WING's 494.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, current ratio 0.50x
- PEG 0.41 vs CMG's 0.81
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.4% revenue growth vs CMG's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.1x vs 54.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs SHAK's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs SHAK's 1.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs WING's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.4% vs WING's -52.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.1% ROA vs SHAK's 2.2%, ROIC 46.0% vs 6.0% |
CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TXRH leads in 3 of 6 categories
SHAK leads 2 • WING leads 1 • CMG leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WING leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 17.1x WING's $709M. WING is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHAK's 2.8%. On growth, SHAK holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.1B | $709M | $1.5B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $225M | $173M | $709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.5B | $112M | $41M | $415M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $132M | $37M | $361M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.1% | +82.6% | +7.5% | +18.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +28.0% | +4.3% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +15.8% | +2.8% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +18.6% | +2.5% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.4% | +7.4% | +14.3% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.9% | -66.7% | -110.0% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SHAK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.9x trailing earnings, WING trades at a 68% valuation discount to SHAK's 64.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WING offers better value at 0.41x vs CMG's 0.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42.3B | $3.5B | $2.8B | $11.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51.8B | $4.6B | $3.4B | $13.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.50x | 20.89x | 64.35x | 29.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.61x | 28.35x | 54.41x | 28.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.80x | 0.41x | — | 0.42x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.82x | 21.28x | 17.50x | 18.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.55x | 5.07x | 1.95x | 1.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.41x | — | 5.30x | 7.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.23x | 33.44x | 49.97x | 34.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHAK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMG delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $8 for SHAK. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMG's 3.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHAK scores 7/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +48.4% | — | +7.6% | +27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.0% | +16.1% | +2.2% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.3% | +46.0% | +6.0% | +14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.4% | +31.0% | +5.4% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.48x | — | 1.63x | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.5B | $1.1B | $542M | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $351M | $239M | $360M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.8B | $1.3B | $902M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.43x | 16.87x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TXRH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $18,576 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,814 for SHAK. Over the past 12 months, TXRH leads with a +4.4% total return vs WING's -52.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 19.7% vs WING's -13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.3% | -49.4% | -16.0% | +4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.9% | -52.6% | -32.1% | +4.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.1% | -35.7% | +4.8% | +71.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.7% | -0.2% | -21.9% | +85.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +258.6% | +494.8% | +100.7% | +331.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.2% | -13.7% | +1.6% | +19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
TXRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXRH is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHAK's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXRH currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs WING's 33.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.24x | 1.81x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.42 | $388.14 | $144.65 | $199.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.75 | $129.31 | $67.20 | $153.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.6% | +33.4% | +48.5% | +88.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 25.7 | 23.8 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14.5M | 1.3M | 1.5M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
TXRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMG as "Buy", WING as "Hold", SHAK as "Hold", TXRH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 120.5% upside for WING (target: $286) vs 6.2% for TXRH (target: $188). For income investors, TXRH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.53% vs WING's 0.89%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.72 | $285.93 | $104.60 | $188.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 67 | 35 | 35 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 | — | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | +6.3% | 0.0% | +1.3% |
TXRH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). SHAK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shake Shack Inc.
(SHAK) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Wingstop Inc. (WING) offers the better valuation at 20. 9x trailing P/E (28. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) a "Buy" — based on 67 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH?
On trailing P/E, Wingstop Inc.
(WING) is the cheapest at 20. 9x versus Shake Shack Inc. at 64. 3x. On forward P/E, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is actually cheaper at 28. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Texas Roadhouse, Inc. wins at 0. 41x versus Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH?
Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) delivered a total return of +85. 8%, compared to -21. 9% for Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WING returned +494. 8% versus SHAK's +100. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Shake Shack Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning SHAK is approximately 141% more volatile than TXRH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 3% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shake Shack Inc.
(SHAK) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus 5. 4% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -5. 7% for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WING leads at 24. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH?
Wingstop Inc.
(WING) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 0% net margin versus 3. 2% for Shake Shack Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WING leads at 27. 6% versus 5. 9% for SHAK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WING leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 41x versus Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) trades at 28. 1x forward P/E versus 54. 4x for Shake Shack Inc. — 26. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WING: 120. 5% to $285. 93.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH?
In this comparison, TXRH (1.
5% yield), WING (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. CMG, SHAK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 5% yield, +331. 7% 10Y return). Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +331. 7%, SHAK: +100. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMG and WING and SHAK and TXRH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CMG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WING is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WING, TXRH pay a dividend while CMG, SHAK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.