Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$42.32B
5Y Perf.+61.8%
WING
Wingstop Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.53B
5Y Perf.+6.4%
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.82B
5Y Perf.+26.3%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.70B
5Y Perf.+242.1%

CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CMG logoCMG
WING logoWING
SHAK logoSHAK
TXRH logoTXRH
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$42.32B$3.53B$2.82B$11.70B
Revenue (TTM)$12.14B$709M$1.49B$6.06B
Net Income (TTM)$1.45B$112M$41M$415M
Gross Margin36.1%82.6%7.5%18.7%
Operating Margin15.8%28.0%4.3%8.2%
Forward P/E28.6x28.3x54.4x28.1x
Total Debt$9.85B$1.33B$902M$1.89B
Cash & Equiv.$351M$239M$360M$135M

CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CMG
WING
SHAK
TXRH
StockMay 20May 26Return
Chipotle Mexican Gr… (CMG)100161.8+61.8%
Wingstop Inc. (WING)100106.4+6.4%
Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK)100126.3+26.3%
Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH)100342.1+242.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TXRH leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Wingstop Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SHAK also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
The Secondary Option

CMG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
WING
Wingstop Inc.
The Quality Compounder

WING is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 15.8% margin vs SHAK's 2.8%
  • 16.1% ROA vs SHAK's 2.2%, ROIC 46.0% vs 6.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.
The Growth Play

SHAK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 354.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
  • 15.4% revenue growth vs CMG's 5.4%
Best for: growth exposure
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
The Income Pick

TXRH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 1.5%
  • 331.7% 10Y total return vs WING's 494.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, current ratio 0.50x
  • PEG 0.41 vs CMG's 0.81
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSHAK logoSHAK15.4% revenue growth vs CMG's 5.4%
ValueTXRH logoTXRHLower P/E (28.1x vs 54.4x)
Quality / MarginsWING logoWING15.8% margin vs SHAK's 2.8%
Stability / SafetyTXRH logoTXRHBeta 0.75 vs SHAK's 1.81, lower leverage
DividendsTXRH logoTXRH1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs WING's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TXRH logoTXRH+4.4% vs WING's -52.6%
Efficiency (ROA)WING logoWING16.1% ROA vs SHAK's 2.2%, ROIC 46.0% vs 6.0%

CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CMGChipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
99.5%$11.9B
Delivery Service
0.5%$60M
WINGWingstop Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
53.5%$292M
Advertising Fees
45.3%$248M
Franchise
1.2%$7M
SHAKShake Shack Inc.
FY 2025
Shack Sales
96.3%$1.4B
Sales-Based Royalties
3.6%$52M
Initial Territory and Opening Fees
0.2%$3M
TXRHTexas Roadhouse, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
99.5%$5.8B
Franchise royalties
0.5%$28M
Franchise fees
0.0%$3M

CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTXRHLAGGINGCMG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WING leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 17.1x WING's $709M. WING is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHAK's 2.8%. On growth, SHAK holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …WING logoWINGWingstop Inc.SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$12.1B$709M$1.5B$6.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.3B$225M$173M$709M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.5B$112M$41M$415M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.5B$132M$37M$361M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+36.1%+82.6%+7.5%+18.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.8%+28.0%+4.3%+8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.0%+15.8%+2.8%+6.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.4%+18.6%+2.5%+5.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.4%+7.4%+14.3%+12.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-17.9%-66.7%-110.0%+10.0%
WING leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SHAK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 20.9x trailing earnings, WING trades at a 68% valuation discount to SHAK's 64.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WING offers better value at 0.41x vs CMG's 0.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …WING logoWINGWingstop Inc.SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
Market CapShares × price$42.3B$3.5B$2.8B$11.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$51.8B$4.6B$3.4B$13.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS28.50x20.89x64.35x29.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.28.61x28.35x54.41x28.11x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.80x0.41x0.42x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.82x21.28x17.50x18.96x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.55x5.07x1.95x1.99x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share15.41x5.30x7.96x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF29.23x33.44x49.97x34.19x
SHAK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SHAK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CMG delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $8 for SHAK. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMG's 3.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHAK scores 7/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …WING logoWINGWingstop Inc.SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+48.4%+7.6%+27.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+16.0%+16.1%+2.2%+12.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.3%+46.0%+6.0%+14.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+25.4%+31.0%+5.4%+20.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95674
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.48x1.63x1.27x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9.5B$1.1B$542M$1.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$351M$239M$360M$135M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9.8B$1.3B$902M$1.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.43x16.87x
SHAK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TXRH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $18,576 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,814 for SHAK. Over the past 12 months, TXRH leads with a +4.4% total return vs WING's -52.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 19.7% vs WING's -13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …WING logoWINGWingstop Inc.SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.3%-49.4%-16.0%+4.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-36.9%-52.6%-32.1%+4.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-20.1%-35.7%+4.8%+71.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+16.7%-0.2%-21.9%+85.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+258.6%+494.8%+100.7%+331.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.2%-13.7%+1.6%+19.7%
TXRH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TXRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TXRH is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHAK's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXRH currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs WING's 33.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …WING logoWINGWingstop Inc.SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.09x1.24x1.81x0.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$58.42$388.14$144.65$199.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$29.75$129.31$67.20$153.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.6%+33.4%+48.5%+88.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.025.723.842.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded14.5M1.3M1.5M1.0M
TXRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TXRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CMG as "Buy", WING as "Hold", SHAK as "Hold", TXRH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 120.5% upside for WING (target: $286) vs 6.2% for TXRH (target: $188). For income investors, TXRH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.53% vs WING's 0.89%.

MetricCMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …WING logoWINGWingstop Inc.SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$43.72$285.93$104.60$188.36
# AnalystsCovering analysts67353543
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises205
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.15$2.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.7%+6.3%0.0%+1.3%
TXRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TXRH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). SHAK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallTexas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CMG vs WING vs SHAK vs TXRH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Shake Shack Inc.

(SHAK) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Wingstop Inc. (WING) offers the better valuation at 20. 9x trailing P/E (28. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) a "Buy" — based on 67 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH?

On trailing P/E, Wingstop Inc.

(WING) is the cheapest at 20. 9x versus Shake Shack Inc. at 64. 3x. On forward P/E, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is actually cheaper at 28. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Texas Roadhouse, Inc. wins at 0. 41x versus Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH?

Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) delivered a total return of +85. 8%, compared to -21. 9% for Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WING returned +494. 8% versus SHAK's +100. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Shake Shack Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning SHAK is approximately 141% more volatile than TXRH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 3% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shake Shack Inc.

(SHAK) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus 5. 4% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -5. 7% for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WING leads at 24. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH?

Wingstop Inc.

(WING) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 0% net margin versus 3. 2% for Shake Shack Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WING leads at 27. 6% versus 5. 9% for SHAK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WING leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 41x versus Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) trades at 28. 1x forward P/E versus 54. 4x for Shake Shack Inc. — 26. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WING: 120. 5% to $285. 93.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH?

In this comparison, TXRH (1.

5% yield), WING (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. CMG, SHAK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CMG or WING or SHAK or TXRH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 5% yield, +331. 7% 10Y return). Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +331. 7%, SHAK: +100. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CMG and WING and SHAK and TXRH?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CMG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WING is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WING, TXRH pay a dividend while CMG, SHAK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CMG

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WING

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHAK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TXRH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CMG and WING and SHAK and TXRH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CMG: 7.4% · WING: 7.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(CMG: 12.0% · WING: 15.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CMG: 28.5x · WING: 20.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.