Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CMPR vs SSTK vs ETSY vs UPWK vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Specialty Retail
Staffing & Employment Services
Specialty Retail
CMPR vs SSTK vs ETSY vs UPWK vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Internet Content & Information | Specialty Retail | Staffing & Employment Services | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $2.23B | $624M | $6.07B | $1.38B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.56B | $946M | $2.86B | $595M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23M | $-21M | $285M | $109M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 47.0% | 57.5% | 72.0% | 103.0% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 3.9% | 14.3% | 20.7% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 28.0x | 13.6x | 18.5x | 7.4x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $318M | $742M | $381M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $234M | $178M | $1.40B | $298M | $86.81B |
CMPR vs SSTK vs ETSY vs UPWK vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cimpress plc (CMPR) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
| Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK) | 100 | 44.8 | -55.2% |
| Etsy, Inc. (ETSY) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
| Upwork Inc. (UPWK) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMPR vs SSTK vs ETSY vs UPWK vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMPR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +122.6% vs UPWK's -34.8%
SSTK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 7.6%
- 7.6% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, ETSY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
UPWK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.16, Low D/E 60.4%, current ratio 1.46x
- Beta 1.16, current ratio 1.46x
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 34.8x)
- 18.3% margin vs SSTK's -2.2%
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs ETSY's 6.8%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4%
- 11.5% ROA vs SSTK's -1.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs 11.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.3% margin vs SSTK's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.16 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 7.6% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +122.6% vs UPWK's -34.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs SSTK's -1.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs 11.5% |
CMPR vs SSTK vs ETSY vs UPWK vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMPR vs SSTK vs ETSY vs UPWK vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SSTK leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMZN leads 2 • UPWK leads 1 • CMPR leads 0 • ETSY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1248.2x UPWK's $595M. UPWK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSTK's -2.2%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $946M | $2.9B | $595M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $387M | $118M | $508M | $150M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | -$21M | $285M | $109M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $193M | $114M | $673M | $224M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.0% | +57.5% | +72.0% | +103.0% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +3.9% | +14.3% | +20.7% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | -2.2% | +9.9% | +18.3% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +12.0% | +23.5% | +37.7% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.0% | -17.9% | +3.1% | -100.0% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.4% | -3.5% | +2.2% | +29.6% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SSTK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, UPWK trades at a 92% valuation discount to CMPR's 158.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SSTK's 3.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $624M | $6.1B | $1.4B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $763M | $5.4B | $1.5B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 158.59x | 13.59x | 46.03x | 12.78x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.96x | — | 18.51x | 7.37x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.09x | 3.80x | 11.53x | 9.66x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 0.63x | 2.11x | 1.76x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.06x | — | 2.35x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.41x | 5.04x | 9.51x | 5.71x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SSTK. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPWK's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SSTK scores 8/9 vs ETSY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -3.6% | — | +17.9% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | -1.5% | +10.6% | +8.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.8% | +11.5% | — | +14.3% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.6% | +15.6% | +22.9% | +16.2% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.55x | — | 0.60x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $139M | -$653M | $83M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $234M | $178M | $1.4B | $298M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $318M | $742M | $381M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.95x | 1.71x | 27.47x | 146.13x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,524 for UPWK. Over the past 12 months, CMPR leads with a +122.6% total return vs UPWK's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs SSTK's -27.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.1% | -7.2% | +11.7% | -46.5% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +122.6% | +5.7% | +39.3% | -34.8% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.6% | -61.2% | -31.0% | +32.0% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | -73.5% | -61.3% | -74.8% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | -34.5% | +681.2% | -49.9% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.7% | -27.1% | -11.7% | +9.7% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UPWK and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UPWK is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs UPWK's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.48x | 1.22x | 1.16x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.02 | $29.50 | $76.52 | $22.84 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.44 | $14.73 | $44.00 | $10.02 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +57.6% | +83.6% | +46.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.5 | 44.0 | 59.1 | 35.0 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 120K | 265K | 2.8M | 3.4M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
SSTK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMPR as "Hold", SSTK as "Hold", ETSY as "Buy", UPWK as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 294.5% upside for SSTK (target: $67) vs 9.5% for ETSY (target: $70). SSTK is the only dividend payer here at 7.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $102.50 | $67.00 | $70.07 | $23.14 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 18 | 45 | 23 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.6% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.28 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | 0.0% | +12.8% | +9.8% | 0.0% |
SSTK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). AMZN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CMPR vs SSTK vs ETSY vs UPWK vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMPR or SSTK or ETSY or UPWK or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). Upwork Inc. (UPWK) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Etsy, Inc. (ETSY) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMPR or SSTK or ETSY or UPWK or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus Cimpress plc at 158. 6x. On forward P/E, Upwork Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMPR or SSTK or ETSY or UPWK or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -74. 8% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus UPWK's -49. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMPR or SSTK or ETSY or UPWK or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 30% more volatile than UPWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 60% for Upwork Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMPR or SSTK or ETSY or UPWK or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -91. 0% for Cimpress plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMPR or SSTK or ETSY or UPWK or AMZN?
Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus 0. 4% for Cimpress plc — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus 6. 6% for CMPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPWK leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMPR or SSTK or ETSY or UPWK or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 27. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SSTK: 294. 5% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMPR or SSTK or ETSY or UPWK or AMZN?
In this comparison, SSTK (7.
6% yield) pays a dividend. CMPR, ETSY, UPWK, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMPR or SSTK or ETSY or UPWK or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Etsy, Inc.
(ETSY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), +681. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETSY: +681. 2%, CMPR: -1. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMPR and SSTK and ETSY and UPWK and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CMPR (Communication Services) and SSTK (Communication Services) and ETSY (Consumer Cyclical) and UPWK (Industrials) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CMPR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SSTK is a small-cap deep-value stock; ETSY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. SSTK pays a dividend while CMPR, ETSY, UPWK, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 28%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 34%
- Dividend Yield > 3.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.