Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CNMD vs MMSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
CNMD vs MMSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $1.15B | $3.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $1.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $139M |
| Gross Margin | 53.6% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $835M | $898M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $449M |
CNMD vs MMSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONMED Corporation (CNMD) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| Merit Medical Syste… (MMSI) | 100 | 137.0 | +37.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNMD vs MMSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNMD is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 15.3x)
- 2.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- -32.5% vs MMSI's -33.6%
MMSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.71
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 4.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 215.9% 10Y total return vs CNMD's 4.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% revenue growth vs CNMD's 5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs CNMD's 4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs CNMD's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -32.5% vs MMSI's -33.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs CNMD's 2.4%, ROIC 7.2% vs 5.8% |
CNMD vs MMSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNMD vs MMSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMSI and CNMD operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $1.4B in trailing revenue. MMSI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNMD's 4.0%. On growth, MMSI holds the edge at +7.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $219M | $290M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | $139M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $124M | $274M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.6% | +48.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +17.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | +7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +136.8% | +38.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CNMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.7x trailing earnings, CNMD trades at a 15% valuation discount to MMSI's 28.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CNMD's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MMSI's 12.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.72x | 28.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.53x | 15.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.68x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.05x | 12.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.84x | 2.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.13x | 2.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.63x | 17.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MMSI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMSI delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNMD. MMSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNMD's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMSI scores 6/9 vs CNMD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.4% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $794M | $450M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $449M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $835M | $898M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.20x | 10.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MMSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMSI five years ago would be worth $9,502 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,871 for CNMD. Over the past 12 months, CNMD leads with a -32.5% total return vs MMSI's -33.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMSI at -10.1% vs CNMD's -31.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.9% | -28.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -32.5% | -33.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.0% | -27.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.3% | -5.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.7% | +215.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.6% | -10.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MMSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MMSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNMD's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.08 | $100.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.21 | $59.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.1% | +61.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.3 | 30.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 408K | 779K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CNMD as "Hold" and MMSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 109.0% upside for CNMD (target: $78) vs 54.1% for MMSI (target: $95). CNMD is the only dividend payer here at 2.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $78.00 | $95.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MMSI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNMD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CNMD vs MMSI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNMD or MMSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for CONMED Corporation (CNMD). CONMED Corporation (CNMD) offers the better valuation at 24. 7x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (MMSI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNMD or MMSI?
On trailing P/E, CONMED Corporation (CNMD) is the cheapest at 24.
7x versus Merit Medical Systems, Inc. at 28. 9x. On forward P/E, CONMED Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNMD or MMSI?
Over the past 5 years, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) delivered a total return of -5. 0%, compared to -71. 3% for CONMED Corporation (CNMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMSI returned +215. 9% versus CNMD's +4. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNMD or MMSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus CONMED Corporation's 1. 34β — meaning CNMD is approximately 88% more volatile than MMSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (MMSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 81% for CONMED Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNMD or MMSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus 5. 2% for CONMED Corporation (CNMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Merit Medical Systems, Inc. grew EPS 4. 9% year-over-year, compared to -64. 6% for CONMED Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMSI leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNMD or MMSI?
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 5% net margin versus 3. 4% for CONMED Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMSI leads at 12. 2% versus 10. 3% for CNMD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNMD leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNMD or MMSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CONMED Corporation (CNMD) trades at 8.
5x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Merit Medical Systems, Inc. — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNMD: 109. 0% to $78. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNMD or MMSI?
In this comparison, CNMD (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. MMSI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CNMD or MMSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
(MMSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +215. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMSI: +215. 9%, CNMD: +4. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNMD and MMSI?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CNMD pays a dividend while MMSI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.