Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CNOB vs DCOM vs OCFC vs NBTB vs TRMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CNOB vs DCOM vs OCFC vs NBTB vs TRMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.50B | $1.64B | $1.08B | $2.35B | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $606M | $730M | $656M | $867M | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $80M | $111M | $71M | $169M | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 44.2% | 56.1% | 54.5% | 72.1% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 21.5% | 14.1% | 25.3% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 10.7x | 9.9x | 10.8x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.17B | $371M | $1.63B | $327M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $92M | $2.35B | $135M | $185M | $668M |
CNOB vs DCOM vs OCFC vs NBTB vs TRMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB) | 100 | 204.0 | +104.0% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 175.0 | +75.0% |
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 113.1 | +13.1% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNOB vs DCOM vs OCFC vs NBTB vs TRMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNOB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.8x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
DCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +46.6% vs NBTB's +9.0%
OCFC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89 vs CNOB's 1.10, lower leverage
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.8%, EPS growth 1.9%
- 127.7% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- PEG 1.42 vs OCFC's 3.57
- NIM 3.4% vs OCFC's 2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs CNOB's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.6% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
CNOB vs DCOM vs OCFC vs NBTB vs TRMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CNOB vs DCOM vs OCFC vs NBTB vs TRMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 1 of 6 categories
DCOM leads 1 • CNOB leads 0 • OCFC leads 0 • TRMK leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRMK each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 1.8x CNOB's $606M. TRMK is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCFC's 10.8%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $606M | $730M | $656M | $867M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $122M | $161M | $103M | $241M | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $80M | $111M | $71M | $169M | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $102M | $182M | $80M | $225M | $230M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.2% | +56.1% | +54.5% | +72.1% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +21.5% | +14.1% | +25.3% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +15.2% | +10.8% | +19.5% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +25.0% | +12.1% | +25.2% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.1% | +2.3% | -36.1% | +39.5% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DCOM and OCFC and TRMK each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 40% valuation discount to CNOB's 20.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs OCFC's 5.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.1B | $2.4B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | -$341M | $2.6B | $2.5B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.21x | 15.73x | 16.14x | 13.53x | 12.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.26x | 10.72x | 9.93x | 10.80x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.47x | 5.80x | 1.92x | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.90x | -2.18x | 27.70x | 10.35x | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.48x | 2.25x | 1.65x | 2.71x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 1.09x | 0.65x | 1.21x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.89x | 9.00x | 13.63x | 10.75x | 11.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMK delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $4 for OCFC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OCFC's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +7.7% | +4.3% | +9.5% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +0.8% | +0.5% | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +5.6% | +2.2% | +7.9% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +6.1% | +2.7% | +2.4% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.25x | 0.98x | 0.17x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | -$2.0B | $1.5B | $142M | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $92M | $2.4B | $135M | $185M | $668M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $371M | $1.6B | $327M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.39x | 0.57x | 0.33x | 1.05x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMK five years ago would be worth $14,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,246 for OCFC. Over the past 12 months, DCOM leads with a +46.6% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DCOM at 31.8% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.2% | +26.4% | +8.1% | +9.3% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.6% | +46.6% | +20.5% | +9.0% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.5% | +129.1% | +55.7% | +54.1% | +118.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.9% | +22.7% | +2.5% | +29.9% | +47.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.0% | +68.6% | +45.4% | +102.2% | +127.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.9% | +31.8% | +15.9% | +15.5% | +29.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DCOM and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNOB's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DCOM currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs OCFC's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.05x | 1.05x | 0.89x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.65 | $37.87 | $20.61 | $46.92 | $45.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.79 | $24.57 | $16.09 | $39.20 | $33.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +98.4% | +91.6% | +96.1% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.7 | 60.5 | 53.8 | 57.3 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 354K | 271K | 662K | 236K | 392K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OCFC and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CNOB as "Buy", DCOM as "Hold", OCFC as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.7% upside for CNOB (target: $34) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, OCFC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.45% vs CNOB's 2.12%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $39.50 | $19.67 | $46.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.7% | +4.5% | +3.2% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.63 | $1.00 | $0.84 | $1.43 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +7.6% | +0.4% | +3.0% |
NBTB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). DCOM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
CNOB vs DCOM vs OCFC vs NBTB vs TRMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNOB or DCOM or OCFC or NBTB or TRMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNOB or DCOM or OCFC or NBTB or TRMK?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. at 20. 2x. On forward P/E, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 42x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNOB or DCOM or OCFC or NBTB or TRMK?
Over the past 5 years, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) delivered a total return of +47.
6%, compared to +2. 5% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMK returned +127. 7% versus OCFC's +45. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNOB or DCOM or OCFC or NBTB or TRMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CNOB is approximately 24% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 98% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNOB or DCOM or OCFC or NBTB or TRMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to -29. 1% for OceanFirst Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNOB or DCOM or OCFC or NBTB or TRMK?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus 10. 8% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus 14. 1% for OCFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNOB or DCOM or OCFC or NBTB or TRMK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Trustmark Corporation — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNOB: 13. 7% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNOB or DCOM or OCFC or NBTB or TRMK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 2. 1% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB).
09Is CNOB or DCOM or OCFC or NBTB or TRMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, OCFC: +45. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNOB and DCOM and OCFC and NBTB and TRMK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.