CNTM
ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-46.9%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CNTM vs AMPX vs FLUX vs ENPH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$2.21B
5Y Perf.+1558.3%
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$23M
5Y Perf.-60.8%
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
Solar
Market Cap$4.67B
5Y Perf.-66.9%
CNTM vs AMPX vs FLUX vs ENPH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CNTM | AMPX | FLUX | ENPH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar |
| Market Cap | $14M | $2.21B | $23M | $4.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $90M | $51M | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $-40M | $-6M | $135M |
| Gross Margin | 29.5% | 18.1% | 32.1% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | -33.6% | -23.4% | -1.9% | 6.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $40M | $16M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $90M | $1M | $474M |
CNTM vs AMPX vs FLUX vs ENPH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CNTM
AMPX
FLUX
ENPH
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ConnectM Technology… (CNTM) | 100 | 53.1 | -46.9% |
| Amprius Technologie… (AMPX) | 100 | 1658.3 | +1558.3% |
| Flux Power Holdings… (FLUX) | 100 | 39.2 | -60.8% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 33.1 | -66.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNTM vs AMPX vs FLUX vs ENPH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AMPX and ENPH are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Enphase Energy, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CNTM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CNTM
ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc.
The Income Pick
CNTM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 0.25
- Beta 0.25 vs AMPX's 3.05
Best for: income & stability
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play
AMPX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 202.1%, EPS growth 22.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 154.9%
- 94.2% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.4%
- 202.1% revenue growth vs FLUX's 9.2%
- +5.8% vs CNTM's -57.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
The Secondary Option
FLUX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: industrials exposure
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
ENPH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- 9.6% margin vs CNTM's -45.3%
- 4.2% ROA vs CNTM's -70.0%, ROIC 6.8% vs -428.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AMPX | 202.1% revenue growth vs FLUX's 9.2% |
| Quality / Margins | ENPH | 9.6% margin vs CNTM's -45.3% |
| Stability / Safety | CNTM | Beta 0.25 vs AMPX's 3.05 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMPX | +5.8% vs CNTM's -57.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ENPH | 4.2% ROA vs CNTM's -70.0%, ROIC 6.8% vs -428.6% |
CNTM vs AMPX vs FLUX vs ENPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
CNTM vs AMPX vs FLUX vs ENPH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLENPHLAGGINGFLUX
Who Leads Where
ENPH leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMPX leads 1 • CNTM leads 0 • FLUX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓FLUXFlux Power Holdings, …
0leads
CNTMConnectM Technology S…
0leads
AMPXAmprius Technologies,…
1leads
ENPHEnphase Energy, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AMPXvs CNTMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ENPH4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ENPH6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMPX5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENPH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 39.1x CNTM's $36M. ENPH is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNTM's -45.3%. On growth, AMPX holds the edge at +152.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CNTMConnectM Technolo… | AMPXAmprius Technolog… | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | ENPHEnphase Energy, I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $90M | $51M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$18M | -$212,000 | $171M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | -$40M | -$6M | $135M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$59M | -$7M | $145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +18.1% | +32.1% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.6% | -23.4% | -1.9% | +6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -45.3% | -44.0% | -12.5% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | -65.1% | -14.7% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.9% | +152.9% | -60.6% | -20.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -103.1% | +49.6% | -25.0% | -127.3% |
ENPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMPX and FLUX and ENPH each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CNTMConnectM Technolo… | AMPXAmprius Technolog… | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | ENPHEnphase Energy, I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $2.2B | $23M | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $2.2B | $37M | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.85x | -46.06x | -3.25x | 27.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 18.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 22.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.38x | 30.25x | 0.34x | 3.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.61x | 19.35x | — | 4.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 48.75x |
Evenly matched — AMPX and FLUX and ENPH each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-10 for CNTM. AMPX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNTM's 8.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMPX scores 6/9 vs CNTM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CNTMConnectM Technolo… | AMPXAmprius Technolog… | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | ENPHEnphase Energy, I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.3% | -40.4% | -7.4% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -70.0% | -28.0% | -21.0% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.3% | -66.4% | -30.1% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.7% | -38.4% | — | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.84x | 0.38x | — | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | -$51M | $15M | $769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $90M | $1M | $474M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $40M | $16M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.45x | — | -2.64x | 47.60x |
ENPH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMPX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMPX five years ago would be worth $19,422 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,358 for FLUX. Over the past 12 months, AMPX leads with a +583.1% total return vs CNTM's -57.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMPX at 21.4% vs ENPH's -39.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CNTMConnectM Technolo… | AMPXAmprius Technolog… | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | ENPHEnphase Energy, I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -56.4% | +84.4% | -8.5% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.4% | +583.1% | -31.9% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.7% | +79.1% | -66.1% | -78.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.7% | +94.2% | -86.4% | -71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.7% | +94.2% | -69.0% | +1737.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.9% | +21.4% | -30.3% | -39.9% |
AMPX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNTM and AMPX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNTM is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMPX's 3.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMPX currently trades 70.7% from its 52-week high vs FLUX's 17.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CNTMConnectM Technolo… | AMPXAmprius Technolog… | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | ENPHEnphase Energy, I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 3.11x | 2.23x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.80 | $22.80 | $7.55 | $54.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $2.26 | $0.97 | $25.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.8% | +70.7% | +17.2% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.3 | 62.2 | 57.8 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 9.1M | 114K | 5.9M |
Evenly matched — CNTM and AMPX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMPX as "Buy", ENPH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.6% upside for ENPH (target: $42) vs 14.8% for AMPX (target: $19).
| Metric | CNTMConnectM Technolo… | AMPXAmprius Technolog… | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | ENPHEnphase Energy, I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.50 | — | $42.41 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | — | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.8% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ENPH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMPX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallEnphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CNTM vs AMPX vs FLUX vs ENPH: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNTM or AMPX or FLUX or ENPH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amprius Technologies, Inc.
(AMPX) is the stronger pick with 202. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 2% for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX). Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amprius Technologies, Inc. (AMPX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CNTM or AMPX or FLUX or ENPH?
Over the past 5 years, Amprius Technologies, Inc.
(AMPX) delivered a total return of +94. 2%, compared to -86. 4% for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1789% versus FLUX's -76. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CNTM or AMPX or FLUX or ENPH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc.
(CNTM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Amprius Technologies, Inc. 's 3. 11β — meaning AMPX is approximately 531% more volatile than CNTM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amprius Technologies, Inc. (AMPX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 9% for ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CNTM or AMPX or FLUX or ENPH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amprius Technologies, Inc.
(AMPX) is pulling ahead at 202. 1% versus 9. 2% for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 81. 4% year-over-year, compared to 20. 0% for Flux Power Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMPX leads at 154. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CNTM or AMPX or FLUX or ENPH?
Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -60. 3% for Amprius Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENPH leads at 11. 2% versus -63. 9% for AMPX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CNTM or AMPX or FLUX or ENPH more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENPH: 19.
6% to $42. 41.
07Which pays a better dividend — CNTM or AMPX or FLUX or ENPH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CNTM or AMPX or FLUX or ENPH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc.
(CNTM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49)). Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNTM: -46. 7%, FLUX: -76. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CNTM and AMPX and FLUX and ENPH?
These companies operate in different sectors (CNTM (Technology) and AMPX (Industrials) and FLUX (Industrials) and ENPH (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CNTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMPX is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CNTM: 79.9% · AMPX: 152.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.