Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CNVS vs AMCX vs CURI vs FUBO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CNVS
Cineverse Corp.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50M
5Y Perf.-84.9%
AMCX
AMC Networks Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$376M
5Y Perf.-68.9%
CURI
CuriosityStream Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$181M
5Y Perf.-68.5%
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$302M
5Y Perf.-92.6%

CNVS vs AMCX vs CURI vs FUBO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CNVS logoCNVS
AMCX logoAMCX
CURI logoCURI
FUBO logoFUBO
IndustryEntertainmentEntertainmentBroadcastingBroadcasting
Market Cap$50M$376M$181M$302M
Revenue (TTM)$55M$2.30B$72M$2.72B
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$52M$-6M$156M
Gross Margin53.9%37.3%56.6%11.1%
Operating Margin-12.5%9.2%-10.2%-2.6%
Forward P/E16.1x5.2x88.0x
Total Debt$462K$1.85B$12M$670M
Cash & Equiv.$14M$502M$18M$452M

CNVS vs AMCX vs CURI vs FUBOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CNVS
AMCX
CURI
FUBO
StockMay 20May 26Return
Cineverse Corp. (CNVS)10015.1-84.9%
AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX)10031.1-68.9%
CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI)10031.5-68.5%
fuboTV Inc. (FUBO)1007.4-92.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CNVS vs AMCX vs CURI vs FUBO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMCX and FUBO are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. fuboTV Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. CURI also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CNVS
Cineverse Corp.
The Growth Angle

CNVS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
AMCX
AMC Networks Inc.
The Defensive Pick

AMCX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 1.67x
  • Beta 0.94, current ratio 1.67x
  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.94 vs FUBO's 1.80
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CURI
CuriosityStream Inc.
The Income Pick

CURI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 12.4%
  • -63.9% 10Y total return vs AMCX's -87.0%
  • 12.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.
The Growth Play

FUBO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 67.7%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
  • 67.7% revenue growth vs AMCX's -4.5%
  • 5.7% margin vs CNVS's -16.7%
  • 8.1% ROA vs CNVS's -13.4%, ROIC -3.3% vs 20.3%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFUBO logoFUBO67.7% revenue growth vs AMCX's -4.5%
ValueAMCX logoAMCXBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsFUBO logoFUBO5.7% margin vs CNVS's -16.7%
Stability / SafetyAMCX logoAMCXBeta 0.94 vs FUBO's 1.80
DividendsCURI logoCURI12.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMCX logoAMCX+42.2% vs FUBO's -68.3%
Efficiency (ROA)FUBO logoFUBO8.1% ROA vs CNVS's -13.4%, ROIC -3.3% vs 20.3%

CNVS vs AMCX vs CURI vs FUBO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CNVSCineverse Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

AMCXAMC Networks Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
62.9%$1.5B
Advertising
25.1%$581M
License
12.0%$278M
CURICuriosityStream Inc.
FY 2025
Trade And Barter Transactions
100.0%$18,000
FUBOfuboTV Inc.
FY 2024
Subscription and Circulation
92.4%$1.5B
Advertising
7.1%$115M
Service, Other
0.5%$7M

CNVS vs AMCX vs CURI vs FUBO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCURILAGGINGFUBO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FUBO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FUBO is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 49.2x CNVS's $55M. FUBO is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNVS's -16.7%. On growth, FUBO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$55M$2.3B$72M$2.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M$1.0B$14M-$14M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M$52M-$6M$156M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$13M$241M$13M-$81M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+53.9%+37.3%+56.6%+11.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.5%+9.2%-10.2%-2.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-16.7%+2.3%-9.0%+5.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-22.8%+10.5%+18.1%-3.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-60.0%-2.4%+35.8%+2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-113.2%-2.3%-31.2%+81.8%
FUBO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — AMCX and FUBO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.3x trailing earnings, AMCX trades at a 67% valuation discount to CNVS's 16.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMCX's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CURI's 23.7x.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.
Market CapShares × price$50M$376M$181M$302M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$37M$1.7B$175M$520M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.06x5.30x-28.00x-42.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.19x88.00x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.14x1.57x23.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.64x0.16x2.52x0.11x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.21x0.49x4.28x0.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.10x1.38x13.96x
Evenly matched — AMCX and FUBO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CNVS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

FUBO delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-24 for CNVS. CNVS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMCX's 1.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNVS scores 7/9 vs FUBO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-24.4%+5.0%-13.1%+16.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.4%+1.3%-8.2%+8.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+20.3%+4.0%-12.2%-3.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+22.3%+3.9%-13.6%-4.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97654
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x1.83x0.30x0.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$13M$1.3B-$6M$218M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$14M$502M$18M$452M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$462,000$1.9B$12M$670M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.16x1.97x10.35x
CNVS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CURI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CURI five years ago would be worth $3,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $524 for FUBO. Over the past 12 months, AMCX leads with a +42.2% total return vs FUBO's -68.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CURI at 53.9% vs CNVS's -27.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+22.4%-4.9%-16.0%-66.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.2%+42.2%-21.7%-68.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-61.1%-42.4%+264.4%-53.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.0%-81.4%-68.8%-94.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.6%-87.0%-63.9%-90.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-27.0%-16.8%+53.9%-22.8%
CURI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

AMCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMCX is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUBO's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMCX currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs FUBO's 18.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.46x0.94x1.30x1.80x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.39$10.18$7.15$56.64
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.77$5.41$2.81$2.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+34.8%+86.4%+43.1%+18.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.558.945.840.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded144K389K350K1.9M
AMCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CURI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: AMCX as "Hold", CURI as "Buy", FUBO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 279.4% upside for FUBO (target: $39) vs -3.4% for AMCX (target: $9). CURI is the only dividend payer here at 12.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.50$3.67$39.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts40914
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+12.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.38
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.4%+5.9%0.0%0.0%
CURI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CURI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). FUBO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallCuriosityStream Inc. (CURI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CNVS vs AMCX vs CURI vs FUBO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CNVS or AMCX or CURI or FUBO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (5. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CNVS or AMCX or CURI or FUBO?

On trailing P/E, AMC Networks Inc.

(AMCX) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus Cineverse Corp. at 16. 1x. On forward P/E, AMC Networks Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CNVS or AMCX or CURI or FUBO?

Over the past 5 years, CuriosityStream Inc.

(CURI) delivered a total return of -68. 8%, compared to -94. 8% for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CURI returned -63. 9% versus CNVS's -93. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CNVS or AMCX or CURI or FUBO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMC Networks Inc.

(AMCX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus fuboTV Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning FUBO is approximately 91% more volatile than AMCX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 183% for AMC Networks Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CNVS or AMCX or CURI or FUBO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus -4. 5% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AMC Networks Inc. grew EPS 136. 9% year-over-year, compared to 54. 2% for CuriosityStream Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CNVS or AMCX or CURI or FUBO?

fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 7% net margin versus -9. 0% for CuriosityStream Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNVS leads at 10. 1% versus -10. 2% for CURI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CURI leads at 56. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CNVS or AMCX or CURI or FUBO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AMC Networks Inc.

(AMCX) trades at 5. 2x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for CuriosityStream Inc. — 82. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 279. 4% to $39. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CNVS or AMCX or CURI or FUBO?

In this comparison, CURI (12.

4% yield) pays a dividend. CNVS, AMCX, FUBO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CNVS or AMCX or CURI or FUBO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CuriosityStream Inc.

(CURI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 30), 12. 4% yield). fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CURI: -63. 9%, FUBO: -90. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CNVS and AMCX and CURI and FUBO?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CNVS is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMCX is a small-cap deep-value stock; CURI is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock. CURI pays a dividend while CNVS, AMCX, FUBO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CNVS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMCX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CURI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FUBO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 124%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CNVS and AMCX and CURI and FUBO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CNVS: -60.0% · AMCX: -2.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CNVS: 16.1x · AMCX: 5.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.