Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs NFLX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CNVS
Cineverse Corp.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50M
5Y Perf.-84.9%
CURI
CuriosityStream Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$181M
5Y Perf.-68.5%
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$302M
5Y Perf.-92.6%
AMCX
AMC Networks Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$376M
5Y Perf.-68.9%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$370.67B
5Y Perf.+108.4%

CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs NFLX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CNVS logoCNVS
CURI logoCURI
FUBO logoFUBO
AMCX logoAMCX
NFLX logoNFLX
IndustryEntertainmentBroadcastingBroadcastingEntertainmentEntertainment
Market Cap$50M$181M$302M$376M$370.67B
Revenue (TTM)$55M$72M$2.72B$2.30B$45.18B
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$-6M$156M$52M$10.98B
Gross Margin53.9%56.6%11.1%37.3%48.5%
Operating Margin-12.5%-10.2%-2.6%9.2%29.5%
Forward P/E16.1x88.0x5.2x24.5x
Total Debt$462K$12M$670M$1.85B$14.46B
Cash & Equiv.$14M$18M$452M$502M$9.03B

CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs NFLXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CNVS
CURI
FUBO
AMCX
NFLX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Cineverse Corp. (CNVS)10015.1-84.9%
CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI)10031.5-68.5%
fuboTV Inc. (FUBO)1007.4-92.6%
AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX)10031.1-68.9%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100208.4+108.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs NFLX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NFLX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. AMC Networks Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. CURI and FUBO also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CNVS
Cineverse Corp.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, CNVS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
CURI
CuriosityStream Inc.
The Income Pick

CURI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 12.4%
  • 12.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.
The Growth Play

FUBO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 67.7%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
  • 67.7% revenue growth vs AMCX's -4.5%
Best for: growth exposure
AMCX
AMC Networks Inc.
The Defensive Pick

AMCX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 0.94, current ratio 1.67x
  • Lower P/E (5.2x vs 24.5x)
  • +42.2% vs FUBO's -68.3%
Best for: defensive
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 8.7% 10Y total return vs CURI's -63.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
  • 24.3% margin vs CNVS's -16.7%
  • Beta 0.35 vs FUBO's 1.80
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFUBO logoFUBO67.7% revenue growth vs AMCX's -4.5%
ValueAMCX logoAMCXLower P/E (5.2x vs 24.5x)
Quality / MarginsNFLX logoNFLX24.3% margin vs CNVS's -16.7%
Stability / SafetyNFLX logoNFLXBeta 0.35 vs FUBO's 1.80
DividendsCURI logoCURI12.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMCX logoAMCX+42.2% vs FUBO's -68.3%
Efficiency (ROA)NFLX logoNFLX19.8% ROA vs CNVS's -13.4%, ROIC 29.8% vs 20.3%

CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CNVSCineverse Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

CURICuriosityStream Inc.
FY 2025
Trade And Barter Transactions
100.0%$18,000
FUBOfuboTV Inc.
FY 2024
Subscription and Circulation
92.4%$1.5B
Advertising
7.1%$115M
Service, Other
0.5%$7M
AMCXAMC Networks Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
62.9%$1.5B
Advertising
25.1%$581M
License
12.0%$278M
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B

CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs NFLX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNFLXLAGGINGAMCX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 816.5x CNVS's $55M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNVS's -16.7%. On growth, FUBO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$55M$72M$2.7B$2.3B$45.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M$14M-$14M$1.0B$30.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M-$6M$156M$52M$11.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$13M$13M-$81M$241M$9.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+53.9%+56.6%+11.1%+37.3%+48.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.5%-10.2%-2.6%+9.2%+29.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-16.7%-9.0%+5.7%+2.3%+24.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-22.8%+18.1%-3.0%+10.5%+20.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-60.0%+35.8%+2.5%-2.4%+17.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-113.2%-31.2%+81.8%-2.3%+31.1%
NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FUBO and AMCX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.3x trailing earnings, AMCX trades at a 85% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMCX's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CURI's 23.7x.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$50M$181M$302M$376M$370.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$37M$175M$520M$1.7B$376.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.06x-28.00x-42.83x5.30x34.58x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.88.00x5.19x24.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.05x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.14x23.74x1.57x12.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.64x2.52x0.11x0.16x8.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.21x4.28x0.11x0.49x14.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.10x13.96x1.38x39.18x
Evenly matched — FUBO and AMCX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-24 for CNVS. CNVS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMCX's 1.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNVS scores 7/9 vs FUBO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-24.4%-13.1%+16.2%+5.0%+41.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.4%-8.2%+8.1%+1.3%+19.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+20.3%-12.2%-3.3%+4.0%+29.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+22.3%-13.6%-4.1%+3.9%+30.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975467
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.30x0.25x1.83x0.54x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$13M-$6M$218M$1.3B$5.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$14M$18M$452M$502M$9.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$462,000$12M$670M$1.9B$14.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.16x10.35x1.97x17.33x
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CURI and NFLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,974 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $524 for FUBO. Over the past 12 months, AMCX leads with a +42.2% total return vs FUBO's -68.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CURI at 53.9% vs CNVS's -27.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+22.4%-16.0%-66.9%-4.9%-3.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.2%-21.7%-68.3%+42.2%-23.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-61.1%+264.4%-53.9%-42.4%+164.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.0%-68.8%-94.8%-81.4%+79.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.6%-63.9%-90.8%-87.0%+866.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-27.0%+53.9%-22.8%-16.8%+38.2%
Evenly matched — CURI and NFLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AMCX and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUBO's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMCX currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs FUBO's 18.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.46x1.30x1.80x0.94x0.35x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.39$7.15$56.64$10.18$134.12
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.77$2.81$2.48$5.41$75.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+34.8%+43.1%+18.1%+86.4%+65.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.545.840.458.935.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded144K350K1.9M389K42.9M
Evenly matched — AMCX and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CURI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CURI as "Buy", FUBO as "Hold", AMCX as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 279.4% upside for FUBO (target: $39) vs -3.4% for AMCX (target: $9). CURI is the only dividend payer here at 12.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCNVS logoCNVSCineverse Corp.CURI logoCURICuriosityStream I…FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.AMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.67$39.00$8.50$115.59
# AnalystsCovering analysts9144099
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+12.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.38
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.4%0.0%0.0%+5.9%+2.5%
CURI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CURI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.

Best OverallNetflix, Inc. (NFLX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CNVS vs CURI vs FUBO vs AMCX vs NFLX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or NFLX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (5. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or NFLX?

On trailing P/E, AMC Networks Inc.

(AMCX) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 6x. On forward P/E, AMC Networks Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or NFLX?

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) delivered a total return of +79. 7%, compared to -94. 8% for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +866. 6% versus CNVS's -93. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or NFLX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus fuboTV Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning FUBO is approximately 408% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 183% for AMC Networks Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or NFLX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus -4. 5% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AMC Networks Inc. grew EPS 136. 9% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or NFLX?

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -9. 0% for CuriosityStream Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -10. 2% for CURI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CURI leads at 56. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or NFLX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AMC Networks Inc.

(AMCX) trades at 5. 2x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for CuriosityStream Inc. — 82. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 279. 4% to $39. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or NFLX?

In this comparison, CURI (12.

4% yield) pays a dividend. CNVS, FUBO, AMCX, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CNVS or CURI or FUBO or AMCX or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), +866. 6% 10Y return). fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +866. 6%, FUBO: -90. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CNVS and CURI and FUBO and AMCX and NFLX?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CNVS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CURI is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMCX is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. CURI pays a dividend while CNVS, FUBO, AMCX, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CNVS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CURI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FUBO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 124%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMCX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CNVS and CURI and FUBO and AMCX and NFLX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CNVS: -60.0% · CURI: 35.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.