Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CNXC vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
CNXC vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $1.67B | $5.05T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.83B | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.28B | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.2% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 2.0x | 25.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.64B | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $327M | $10.61B |
CNXC vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentrix Corporat… (CNXC) | 100 | 29.6 | -70.3% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 1549.7 | +1449.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNXC vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNXC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, current ratio 1.40x
- Beta 1.38, yield 6.0%, current ratio 1.40x
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 234.3% 10Y total return vs CNXC's -63.2%
- 65.5% revenue growth vs CNXC's 2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs CNXC's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 25.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs CNXC's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.38 vs NVDA's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.9% vs CNXC's -50.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs CNXC's -10.8%, ROIC 81.8% vs 5.6% |
CNXC vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNXC vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 22.0x CNXC's $9.8B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNXC's -13.0%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.8B | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $773M | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.3B | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $572M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.9% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CNXC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CNXC's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVDA's 37.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $5.05T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $5.05T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.17x | 42.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.03x | 25.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.75x | 37.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 23.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 32.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.91x | 52.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-33 for CNXC. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNXC's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNXC scores 5/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.2% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.8% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.69x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.3B | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $327M | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.07x | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $143,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,899 for CNXC. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +82.9% total return vs CNXC's -50.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 92.4% vs CNXC's -31.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.7% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.0% | +82.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.8% | +612.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | +1331.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.2% | +23433.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.4% | +92.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNXC and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNXC is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs CNXC's 38.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.14 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.85 | $110.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.2% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.5 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 166.2M |
Analyst Outlook
CNXC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CNXC as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 119.2% upside for CNXC (target: $52) vs 34.3% for NVDA (target: $279). CNXC is the only dividend payer here at 6.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.00 | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.0% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.42 | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.3% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNXC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CNXC vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNXC or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 42. 4x trailing P/E (25. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNXC or NVDA?
On forward P/E, Concentrix Corporation is actually cheaper at 2.
0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNXC or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1331%, compared to -81.
0% for Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +234. 3% versus CNXC's -63. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNXC or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
38β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning NVDA is approximately 25% more volatile than CNXC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 169% for Concentrix Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNXC or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 2. 2% for Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVIDIA Corporation grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -648. 8% for Concentrix Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNXC or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -13. 0% for Concentrix Corporation — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 6. 2% for CNXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNXC or NVDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) trades at 2.
0x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for NVIDIA Corporation — 23. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNXC: 119. 2% to $52. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNXC or NVDA?
In this comparison, CNXC (6.
0% yield) pays a dividend. NVDA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CNXC or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (6.
0% yield). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNXC: -63. 2%, NVDA: +234. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNXC and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNXC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock. CNXC pays a dividend while NVDA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.