Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CNXC vs TASK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
CNXC vs TASK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.67B | $601M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.83B | $906M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.28B | $105M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | 15.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.2% | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | 2.0x | 4.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.64B | $298M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $327M | $212M |
CNXC vs TASK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentrix Corporat… (CNXC) | 100 | 14.8 | -85.2% |
| TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) | 100 | 19.5 | -80.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNXC vs TASK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNXC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 6.0%
- -63.2% 10Y total return vs TASK's -66.8%
- Lower P/E (2.0x vs 4.8x)
TASK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 49.6%, current ratio 3.12x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 3.12x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs CNXC's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 4.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.6% margin vs CNXC's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs CNXC's 1.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -25.9% vs CNXC's -50.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.3% ROA vs CNXC's -10.8%, ROIC 16.3% vs 5.6% |
CNXC vs TASK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNXC vs TASK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TASK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNXC is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.8B annually — 10.8x TASK's $906M. TASK is the more profitable business, keeping 11.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNXC's -13.0%. On growth, CNXC holds the edge at +4.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.8B | $906M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $773M | $188M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.3B | $105M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $572M | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | +15.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | +11.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.9% | +13.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CNXC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TASK's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNXC's 4.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $601M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $687M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.17x | 6.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.03x | 4.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.75x | 3.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 1.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.91x | 8.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TASK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TASK delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-33 for CNXC. TASK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNXC's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TASK scores 7/9 vs CNXC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.2% | +21.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.8% | +10.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +16.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.69x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.3B | $86M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $327M | $212M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $298M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.07x | 7.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TASK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TASK five years ago would be worth $3,323 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,899 for CNXC. Over the past 12 months, TASK leads with a -25.9% total return vs CNXC's -50.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TASK at -5.5% vs CNXC's -31.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.7% | -9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.0% | -25.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.8% | -15.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | -66.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.2% | -66.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.4% | -5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNXC and TASK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TASK is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNXC's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.14 | $18.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.85 | $6.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.2% | +36.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.5 | 35.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 724K |
Analyst Outlook
CNXC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CNXC as "Buy" and TASK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 119.2% upside for CNXC (target: $52) vs 102.1% for TASK (target: $14). CNXC is the only dividend payer here at 6.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.00 | $13.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.42 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.3% | +4.6% |
TASK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNXC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CNXC vs TASK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNXC or TASK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNXC or TASK?
On forward P/E, Concentrix Corporation is actually cheaper at 2.
0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNXC or TASK?
Over the past 5 years, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) delivered a total return of -66. 8%, compared to -81. 0% for Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNXC returned -63. 2% versus TASK's -66. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNXC or TASK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Concentrix Corporation's 1. 38β — meaning CNXC is approximately 23% more volatile than TASK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 169% for Concentrix Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNXC or TASK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 2. 2% for Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -648. 8% for Concentrix Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CNXC leads at 15. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNXC or TASK?
TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus -13. 0% for Concentrix Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TASK leads at 11. 9% versus 6. 2% for CNXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNXC leads at 35. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNXC or TASK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) trades at 2.
0x forward P/E versus 4. 8x for TaskUs, Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNXC: 119. 2% to $52. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNXC or TASK?
In this comparison, CNXC (6.
0% yield) pays a dividend. TASK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CNXC or TASK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (6.
0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNXC: -63. 2%, TASK: -66. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNXC and TASK?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNXC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock. CNXC pays a dividend while TASK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.