Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

COFS vs FIS vs JKHY vs MBWM vs IBCP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
COFS
ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$471M
5Y Perf.+7.3%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.47B
5Y Perf.-66.0%
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.57B
5Y Perf.-19.3%
MBWM
Mercantile Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$898M
5Y Perf.+126.7%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$699M
5Y Perf.+145.7%

COFS vs FIS vs JKHY vs MBWM vs IBCP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
COFS logoCOFS
FIS logoFIS
JKHY logoJKHY
MBWM logoMBWM
IBCP logoIBCP
IndustryBanks - RegionalInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology ServicesBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$471M$24.47B$10.57B$898M$699M
Revenue (TTM)$193M$10.89B$2.52B$372M$315M
Net Income (TTM)$28M$382M$519M$89M$69M
Gross Margin58.2%38.1%44.1%64.0%69.6%
Operating Margin17.7%17.5%26.0%27.5%25.8%
Forward P/E8.8x7.5x21.8x9.5x9.6x
Total Debt$316M$4.01B$0.00$826M$117M
Cash & Equiv.$88M$599M$102M$473M$52M

COFS vs FIS vs JKHY vs MBWM vs IBCPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

COFS
FIS
JKHY
MBWM
IBCP
StockMay 20May 26Return
ChoiceOne Financial… (COFS)100107.3+7.3%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10034.0-66.0%
Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY)10080.7-19.3%
Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM)100226.7+126.7%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100245.7+145.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: COFS vs FIS vs JKHY vs MBWM vs IBCP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: COFS and JKHY are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. MBWM and FIS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
COFS
ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

COFS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and dividends.

  • 38.7% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
  • 3.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%
Best for: growth and dividends
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.31 vs JKHY's 2.16
  • Lower P/E (7.5x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.31 vs 0.63
Best for: valuation efficiency
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
The Income Pick

JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
  • Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
  • Beta 0.28 vs COFS's 0.95
  • 17.0% ROA vs COFS's 0.7%, ROIC 21.0% vs 4.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MBWM
Mercantile Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

MBWM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and momentum.

  • 23.9% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
  • +23.6% vs FIS's -35.3%
Best for: quality and momentum
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 184.6% 10Y total return vs MBWM's 178.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
  • NIM 3.3% vs MBWM's 2.9%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOFS logoCOFS38.7% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (7.5x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.31 vs 0.63
Quality / MarginsMBWM logoMBWM23.9% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
Stability / SafetyJKHY logoJKHYBeta 0.28 vs COFS's 0.95
DividendsCOFS logoCOFS3.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%
Momentum (1Y)MBWM logoMBWM+23.6% vs FIS's -35.3%
Efficiency (ROA)JKHY logoJKHY17.0% ROA vs COFS's 0.7%, ROIC 21.0% vs 4.1%

COFS vs FIS vs JKHY vs MBWM vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

COFSChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Interchange Income
70.5%$8M
Trust Fee Income
22.8%$3M
Other Charges and Fees for Customer Services
6.8%$751,000
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
JKHYJack Henry & Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Payments
38.2%$873M
Core Segment
32.3%$739M
Complementary
29.5%$675M
MBWMMercantile Bank Corporation
FY 2025
Credit and Debit Card
42.4%$9M
Service Charges on Deposit and Sweep Accounts
37.5%$8M
Payroll Processing
16.0%$3M
Customer Service
4.0%$876,000
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M

COFS vs FIS vs JKHY vs MBWM vs IBCP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJKHYLAGGINGIBCP

Who Leads Where

JKHY leads in 1 of 6 categories

COFS leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • MBWM leads 0 • IBCP leads 0 • 5 tied

Explore the data ↓
IBCPIndependent Bank Corp…
0leads
MBWMMercantile Bank Corpo…
0leads
FISFidelity National Inf…
0leads
COFSChoiceOne Financial S…
0leads
JKHYJack Henry & Associat…
1leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — JKHY and MBWM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 56.5x COFS's $193M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.

MetricCOFS logoCOFSChoiceOne Financi…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$193M$10.9B$2.5B$372M$315M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$49M$3.8B$810M$107M$89M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$28M$382M$519M$89M$69M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$12M$2.8B$728M$11M$70M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.2%+38.1%+44.1%+64.0%+69.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+17.7%+17.5%+26.0%+27.5%+25.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.6%+3.5%+20.6%+23.9%+21.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.4%+26.1%+28.9%+3.0%+22.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.2%+8.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.5%+92.3%+12.5%+14.8%+2.3%
Evenly matched — JKHY and MBWM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FIS and MBWM and IBCP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.5x trailing earnings, MBWM trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MBWM offers better value at 0.63x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCOFS logoCOFSChoiceOne Financi…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Market CapShares × price$471M$24.5B$10.6B$898M$699M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$699M$27.9B$10.5B$1.3B$764M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.67x63.00x23.40x9.53x10.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.79x7.54x21.79x9.54x9.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.58x2.32x0.63x1.97x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.45x7.66x13.53x11.75x9.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.44x2.29x4.45x2.42x2.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.95x1.76x5.01x1.17x1.41x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.73x9.97x17.97x80.15x9.96x
Evenly matched — FIS and MBWM and IBCP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. IBCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs MBWM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCOFS logoCOFSChoiceOne Financi…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.4%+2.7%+24.0%+13.5%+14.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%+1.1%+17.0%+1.4%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.1%+6.0%+21.0%+5.5%+10.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.5%+6.6%+22.7%+8.0%+2.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946648
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.68x0.29x1.14x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$228M$3.4B-$102M$353M$65M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$88M$599M$102M$473M$52M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$316M$4.0B$0$826M$117M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.52x4.64x122.37x0.79x0.91x
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — MBWM and IBCP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MBWM five years ago would be worth $17,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, MBWM leads with a +23.6% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCOFS logoCOFSChoiceOne Financi…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.7%-27.3%-17.8%+10.1%+7.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+15.0%-35.3%-13.6%+23.6%+12.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.3%-6.6%-1.0%+127.3%+130.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+47.0%-63.2%+0.3%+78.4%+63.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+102.0%-13.2%+94.9%+178.2%+184.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.3%-2.2%-0.3%+31.5%+32.1%
Evenly matched — MBWM and IBCP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — JKHY and MBWM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COFS's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MBWM currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCOFS logoCOFSChoiceOne Financi…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.95x0.76x0.28x0.87x0.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.40$82.74$193.39$55.77$37.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.10$43.30$141.81$42.17$29.63
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.0%+57.1%+75.5%+93.3%+90.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.443.328.253.150.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded75K5.5M902K112K176K
Evenly matched — JKHY and MBWM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — COFS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: COFS as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy", MBWM as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 7.9% for COFS (target: $34). For income investors, COFS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs JKHY's 1.54%.

MetricCOFS logoCOFSChoiceOne Financi…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…MBWM logoMBWMMercantile Bank C…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$34.00$67.38$203.75$57.00$38.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3372277
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.8%+3.5%+1.5%+2.8%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises5132611
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.21$1.63$2.25$1.47$1.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%0.0%+0.3%0.0%+1.8%
Evenly matched — COFS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JKHY leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency. 5 categories are tied.

Best OverallJack Henry & Associates, In… (JKHY)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

COFS vs FIS vs JKHY vs MBWM vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is COFS or FIS or JKHY or MBWM or IBCP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc.

(COFS) is the stronger pick with 38. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc. (COFS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — COFS or FIS or JKHY or MBWM or IBCP?

On trailing P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the cheapest at 9.

5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — COFS or FIS or JKHY or MBWM or IBCP?

Over the past 5 years, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) delivered a total return of +78.

4%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — COFS or FIS or JKHY or MBWM or IBCP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning COFS is approximately 234% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — COFS or FIS or JKHY or MBWM or IBCP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc.

(COFS) is pulling ahead at 38. 7% versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. grew EPS 19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — COFS or FIS or JKHY or MBWM or IBCP?

Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.

9% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBWM leads at 27. 5% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is COFS or FIS or JKHY or MBWM or IBCP more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.

08

Which pays a better dividend — COFS or FIS or JKHY or MBWM or IBCP?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

ChoiceOne Financial Services, Inc. (COFS) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 5% for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY).

09

Is COFS or FIS or JKHY or MBWM or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, COFS: +102. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between COFS and FIS and JKHY and MBWM and IBCP?

These companies operate in different sectors (COFS (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology) and MBWM (Financial Services) and IBCP (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: COFS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

COFS

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JKHY

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MBWM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBCP

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform COFS and FIS and JKHY and MBWM and IBCP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(COFS: 38.7% · FIS: 8.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(COFS: 14.6% · FIS: 3.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(COFS: 15.7x · FIS: 63.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.