Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

COHR vs MKSI vs ONTO vs IPGP vs KLIC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
COHR
Coherent, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50.62B
5Y Perf.+571.6%
MKSI
MKS Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+184.8%
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$13.63B
5Y Perf.+781.7%
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.31B
5Y Perf.-34.6%
KLIC
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$5.14B
5Y Perf.+339.0%

COHR vs MKSI vs ONTO vs IPGP vs KLIC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
COHR logoCOHR
MKSI logoMKSI
ONTO logoONTO
IPGP logoIPGP
KLIC logoKLIC
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$50.62B$20.25B$13.63B$4.31B$5.14B
Revenue (TTM)$1.81T$4.07B$1.03B$1.04B$768M
Net Income (TTM)$191.68B$327M$106M$29M$3M
Gross Margin0.1%45.2%48.8%37.6%48.0%
Operating Margin0.0%14.8%10.0%0.3%6.9%
Forward P/E59.5x30.4x38.7x62.6x37.4x
Total Debt$3.89B$4.69B$17M$0.00$39M
Cash & Equiv.$909M$675M$346M$404M$216M

COHR vs MKSI vs ONTO vs IPGP vs KLICLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

COHR
MKSI
ONTO
IPGP
KLIC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Coherent, Inc. (COHR)100671.6+571.6%
MKS Inc. (MKSI)100284.8+184.8%
Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)100881.7+781.7%
IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP)10065.4-34.6%
Kulicke and Soffa I… (KLIC)100439.0+339.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: COHR vs MKSI vs ONTO vs IPGP vs KLIC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: COHR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. MKS Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. ONTO, IPGP, and KLIC also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
COHR
Coherent, Inc.
The Growth Play

COHR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 23.4%, EPS growth 71.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.5%
  • 14.7% 10Y total return vs ONTO's 14.3%
  • 23.4% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4%
  • 10.6% margin vs KLIC's 0.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Value Play

MKSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (30.4x vs 37.4x)
Best for: value
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.
The Niche Pick

ONTO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.

  • 4.7% ROA vs KLIC's 0.3%, ROIC 5.7% vs -0.3%
Best for: efficiency
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation
The Defensive Pick

IPGP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.80, current ratio 6.08x
  • Beta 1.80 vs COHR's 2.79
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
KLIC
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick

KLIC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.87, yield 1.0%
  • Beta 1.87, yield 1.0%, current ratio 4.79x
  • 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs COHR's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOHR logoCOHR23.4% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4%
ValueMKSI logoMKSILower P/E (30.4x vs 37.4x)
Quality / MarginsCOHR logoCOHR10.6% margin vs KLIC's 0.4%
Stability / SafetyIPGP logoIPGPBeta 1.80 vs COHR's 2.79
DividendsKLIC logoKLIC1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs COHR's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)COHR logoCOHR+358.5% vs IPGP's +75.6%
Efficiency (ROA)ONTO logoONTO4.7% ROA vs KLIC's 0.3%, ROIC 5.7% vs -0.3%

COHR vs MKSI vs ONTO vs IPGP vs KLIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

COHRCoherent, Inc.
FY 2025
Lasers Segment
60.1%$1.4B
Materials Segment
39.9%$954M
MKSIMKS Inc.
FY 2025
Product
87.4%$3.4B
Service
12.6%$495M
ONTOOnto Innovation Inc.
FY 2025
Systems And Software Revenue
84.3%$848M
Parts Revenue
8.4%$84M
Service Revenue
7.3%$73M
IPGPIPG Photonics Corporation
FY 2025
High Power Continuous Wave CW Lasers
41.8%$309M
Laser And Non-Laser Systems
19.9%$147M
Pulsed Lasers
19.4%$143M
Medium And Low Power CW Lasers
11.9%$88M
Quasi-Continuous Wave QCW Lasers
7.0%$52M
KLICKulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
FY 2024
Ball Bonding Equipment Segment
52.9%$358M
Aftermarket Products and Services (APS) Segment
23.7%$160M
Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment
15.6%$106M
Advanced Solutions Segment
7.8%$53M

COHR vs MKSI vs ONTO vs IPGP vs KLIC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCOHRLAGGINGIPGP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

COHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

COHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.81T annually — 2356.7x KLIC's $768M. COHR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KLIC's 0.4%. On growth, COHR holds the edge at +1204.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCOHR logoCOHRCoherent, Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…KLIC logoKLICKulicke and Soffa…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.81T$4.1B$1.0B$1.0B$768M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$913M$945M$158M$55M$61M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$191.7B$327M$106M$29M$3M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$537.2B$401M$239M$8M$11M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+0.1%+45.2%+48.8%+37.6%+48.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.0%+14.8%+10.0%+0.3%+6.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.6%+8.0%+10.3%+2.8%+0.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-29.7%+9.8%+23.2%+0.8%+1.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1204.5%+15.2%+9.5%+16.6%+49.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11190.8%+53.2%-48.5%-54.4%+141.5%
COHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 68.8x trailing earnings, MKSI trades at a 99% valuation discount to KLIC's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MKSI's 26.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KLIC's 336.2x.

MetricCOHR logoCOHRCoherent, Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…KLIC logoKLICKulicke and Soffa…
Market CapShares × price$50.6B$20.2B$13.6B$4.3B$5.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$53.6B$24.3B$13.3B$3.9B$5.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-613.83x68.83x98.57x139.22x9999.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.59.48x30.36x38.74x62.62x37.41x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.85x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple48.61x26.70x68.79x48.90x336.22x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.71x5.15x13.56x4.30x7.85x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.83x7.49x6.43x2.04x6.36x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF262.58x40.74x45.47x53.30x
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $0 for KLIC. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COHR scores 7/9 vs ONTO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCOHR logoCOHRCoherent, Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…KLIC logoKLICKulicke and Soffa…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.9%+12.2%+5.2%+1.4%+0.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.4%+3.7%+4.7%+1.2%+0.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.6%+6.5%+5.7%+0.6%-0.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.2%+7.2%+6.5%+0.6%-0.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976467
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.46x1.73x0.01x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.0B$4.0B-$329M-$404M-$177M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$909M$675M$346M$404M$216M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.9B$4.7B$17M$0$39M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.01x2.84x4872.17x
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

COHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in COHR five years ago would be worth $50,156 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,151 for IPGP. Over the past 12 months, COHR leads with a +358.5% total return vs IPGP's +75.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COHR at 114.9% vs IPGP's -4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCOHR logoCOHRCoherent, Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…KLIC logoKLICKulicke and Soffa…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+64.3%+78.8%+65.2%+35.8%+103.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+358.5%+306.1%+118.9%+75.6%+220.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+892.8%+266.0%+218.0%-12.7%+115.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+401.6%+66.5%+312.6%-48.5%+101.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1467.0%+750.6%+1431.7%+20.2%+814.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+114.9%+54.1%+47.1%-4.4%+29.1%
COHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MKSI and IPGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IPGP is the less volatile stock with a 1.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COHR's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MKSI currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs IPGP's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCOHR logoCOHRCoherent, Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…KLIC logoKLICKulicke and Soffa…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.79x2.64x2.66x1.80x1.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$364.80$326.83$315.86$155.82$107.01
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$67.30$71.49$85.88$53.98$29.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.5%+92.0%+86.8%+65.2%+91.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.465.361.039.777.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6.8M1.2M832K510K617K
Evenly matched — MKSI and IPGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KLIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: COHR as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy", IPGP as "Buy", KLIC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for IPGP (target: $152) vs -36.3% for KLIC (target: $63). For income investors, KLIC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.04% vs MKSI's 0.29%.

MetricCOHR logoCOHRCoherent, Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…KLIC logoKLICKulicke and Soffa…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$252.50$272.86$308.33$151.67$62.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts2929112711
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+0.3%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.07$0.87$1.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+0.2%+0.6%+1.3%+1.9%
KLIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

COHR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MKSI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallCoherent, Inc. (COHR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

COHR vs MKSI vs ONTO vs IPGP vs KLIC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is COHR or MKSI or ONTO or IPGP or KLIC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coherent, Inc.

(COHR) is the stronger pick with 23. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coherent, Inc. (COHR) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — COHR or MKSI or ONTO or IPGP or KLIC?

On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.

(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — COHR or MKSI or ONTO or IPGP or KLIC?

Over the past 5 years, Coherent, Inc.

(COHR) delivered a total return of +401. 6%, compared to -48. 5% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COHR returned +1467% versus IPGP's +20. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — COHR or MKSI or ONTO or IPGP or KLIC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

80β versus Coherent, Inc. 's 2. 79β — meaning COHR is approximately 55% more volatile than IPGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — COHR or MKSI or ONTO or IPGP or KLIC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coherent, Inc.

(COHR) is pulling ahead at 23. 4% versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IPG Photonics Corporation grew EPS 117. 8% year-over-year, compared to -31. 5% for Onto Innovation Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COHR leads at 20. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — COHR or MKSI or ONTO or IPGP or KLIC?

Onto Innovation Inc.

(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -0. 5% for KLIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONTO leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is COHR or MKSI or ONTO or IPGP or KLIC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.

(MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 62. 6x for IPG Photonics Corporation — 32. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPGP: 49. 2% to $151. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — COHR or MKSI or ONTO or IPGP or KLIC?

In this comparison, KLIC (1.

0% yield), MKSI (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. COHR, ONTO, IPGP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is COHR or MKSI or ONTO or IPGP or KLIC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.

(KLIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +814. 1% 10Y return). IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KLIC: +814. 1%, IPGP: +20. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between COHR and MKSI and ONTO and IPGP and KLIC?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: COHR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IPGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KLIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KLIC pays a dividend while COHR, MKSI, ONTO, IPGP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

COHR

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 60223%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MKSI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ONTO

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IPGP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KLIC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform COHR and MKSI and ONTO and IPGP and KLIC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(COHR: 120446.5% · MKSI: 15.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(COHR: 10.6% · MKSI: 8.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.