Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CPF vs BPOP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CPF vs BPOP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $905M | $9.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $362M | $4.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $80M | $833M |
| Gross Margin | 76.1% | 66.1% |
| Operating Margin | 27.8% | 22.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $1.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $379M | $403M |
CPF vs BPOP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central Pacific Fin… (CPF) | 100 | 215.2 | +115.2% |
| Popular, Inc. (BPOP) | 100 | 376.9 | +276.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPF vs BPOP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 45.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 17.2%, current ratio 0.14x
BPOP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 473.6% 10Y total return vs CPF's 93.4%
- PEG 0.63 vs CPF's 0.63
- NIM 3.4% vs CPF's 3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% NII/revenue growth vs BPOP's 5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 10.6x), PEG 0.63 vs 0.63 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CPF's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs BPOP's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BPOP's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.3% vs CPF's +35.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CPF's 0.5% |
CPF vs BPOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CPF vs BPOP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BPOP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 12.2x CPF's $362M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.4% (CPF) to 18.8% (BPOP).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $362M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $111M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $80M | $833M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $88M | $681M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.1% | +66.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +22.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | +40.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CPF leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, CPF trades at a 0% valuation discount to BPOP's 12.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CPF offers better value at 0.72x vs BPOP's 0.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $905M | $9.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $628M | $10.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.08x | 12.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.61x | 9.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.72x | 0.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.24x | 10.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.50x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.57x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.51x | 14.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CPF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BPOP delivers a 13.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $14 for CPF. CPF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BPOP's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPF scores 8/9 vs BPOP's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.7% | +13.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$277M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $379M | $403M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.51x | 0.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BPOP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BPOP five years ago would be worth $20,334 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,951 for CPF. Over the past 12 months, BPOP leads with a +53.3% total return vs CPF's +35.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BPOP at 40.7% vs CPF's 39.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.5% | +18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.6% | +53.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | +178.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.5% | +103.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.4% | +473.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.8% | +40.7% |
Risk & Volatility
CPF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPF is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BPOP's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.41 | $152.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.62 | $98.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 148K | 499K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CPF and BPOP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CPF as "Hold" and BPOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.1% upside for BPOP (target: $159) vs -19.2% for CPF (target: $28). For income investors, CPF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.16% vs BPOP's 1.96%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $159.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.09 | $2.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | +5.2% |
CPF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BPOP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CPF vs BPOP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPF or BPOP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Central Pacific Financial Corp.
(CPF) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for Popular, Inc. (BPOP). Central Pacific Financial Corp. (CPF) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Popular, Inc. (BPOP) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPF or BPOP?
On trailing P/E, Central Pacific Financial Corp.
(CPF) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus Popular, Inc. at 12. 1x. On forward P/E, Popular, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Popular, Inc. wins at 0. 63x versus Central Pacific Financial Corp. 's 0. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPF or BPOP?
Over the past 5 years, Popular, Inc.
(BPOP) delivered a total return of +103. 3%, compared to +39. 5% for Central Pacific Financial Corp. (CPF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BPOP returned +473. 6% versus CPF's +93. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPF or BPOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Central Pacific Financial Corp.
(CPF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Popular, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning BPOP is approximately 17% more volatile than CPF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Central Pacific Financial Corp. (CPF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 25% for Popular, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPF or BPOP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Central Pacific Financial Corp.
(CPF) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus 5. 7% for Popular, Inc. (BPOP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Central Pacific Financial Corp. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to 43. 7% for Popular, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPF or BPOP?
Central Pacific Financial Corp.
(CPF) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 4% net margin versus 18. 8% for Popular, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPF leads at 27. 8% versus 22. 7% for BPOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPF leads at 76. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPF or BPOP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Popular, Inc. (BPOP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 63x versus Central Pacific Financial Corp. 's 0. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Popular, Inc. (BPOP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 10. 6x for Central Pacific Financial Corp. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BPOP: 7. 1% to $159. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPF or BPOP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Central Pacific Financial Corp. (CPF) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 0% for Popular, Inc. (BPOP).
09Is CPF or BPOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Popular, Inc.
(BPOP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 2. 0% yield, +473. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BPOP: +473. 6%, CPF: +93. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPF and BPOP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.