Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CPHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CHDN vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
CPHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CHDN vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $81M | $17.60B | $12.65B | $6.14B | $2.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $17.02B | $6.29B | $2.95B | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-529K | $-457M | $59M | $388M | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 62.6% | 44.2% | 41.8% | 33.8% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 4.4% | 0.6% | 23.6% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.8x | 104.4x | 12.7x | 22.8x |
| Total Debt | $117K | $13.35B | $1.93B | $5.20B | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $3.83B | $1.60B | $289M | $687M |
CPHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CHDN vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canterbury Park Hol… (CPHC) | 100 | 143.7 | +43.7% |
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 78.4 | -21.6% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 64.3 | -35.7% |
| Churchill Downs Inc… (CHDN) | 100 | 132.9 | +32.9% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.0 | -49.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CHDN vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPHC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta -0.08, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.60x
- 1.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CHDN's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, FLUT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DKNG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, current ratio 1.03x
- 27.0% revenue growth vs CPHC's -3.2%
CHDN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 0.5%
- 313.9% 10Y total return vs CPHC's 75.7%
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 22.8x)
- 13.2% margin vs PENN's -12.1%
PENN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +9.5% vs FLUT's -58.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs CPHC's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 22.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.2% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs PENN's 1.31 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CHDN's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.5% vs FLUT's -58.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 9.4% vs 1.8% |
CPHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CHDN vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CPHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CHDN vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHDN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CPHC leads 0 • FLUT leads 0 • DKNG leads 0 • PENN leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHDN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 285.8x CPHC's $60M. CHDN is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, FLUT holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $17.0B | $6.3B | $2.9B | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $2.4B | $242M | $932M | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$529,431 | -$457M | $59M | $388M | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $728M | $679M | $734M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.6% | +44.2% | +41.8% | +33.8% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +4.4% | +0.6% | +23.6% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | -2.7% | +0.9% | +13.2% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +4.3% | +10.8% | +24.9% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.9% | +17.4% | +16.8% | +3.2% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.5% | -22.3% | +143.7% | +13.7% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CPHC and CHDN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CPHC's 10.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 50.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $81M | $17.6B | $12.7B | $6.1B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $65M | $27.1B | $13.0B | $11.1B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -158.24x | -58.49x | -3150.62x | 16.57x | -2.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.79x | 104.42x | 12.65x | 22.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.17x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.03x | 10.67x | 49.99x | 11.32x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.36x | 1.07x | 2.09x | 2.10x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 1.87x | 20.04x | 5.96x | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.19x | 16.32x | 19.54x | 12.41x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHDN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHDN delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. CPHC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHDN's 4.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs FLUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | -4.4% | +7.9% | +35.7% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | -1.6% | +1.3% | +5.2% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +4.5% | -0.9% | +9.4% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +4.6% | -0.6% | +11.1% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.38x | 3.06x | 4.92x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | $9.5B | $330M | $4.9B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $3.8B | $1.6B | $289M | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $117,181 | $13.3B | $1.9B | $5.2B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.63x | 4.25x | 5.25x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DKNG and PENN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CPHC five years ago would be worth $12,562 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,065 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, PENN leads with a +9.5% total return vs FLUT's -58.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DKNG at 1.8% vs FLUT's -20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | -53.6% | -28.4% | -21.3% | +12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.4% | -58.0% | -27.8% | -5.5% | +9.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.6% | -49.0% | +5.5% | -38.8% | -35.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.6% | -50.1% | -43.7% | -6.7% | -79.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.7% | -22.9% | +160.4% | +313.9% | +11.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.8% | -20.1% | +1.8% | -15.1% | -13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CPHC and PENN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPHC is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PENN currently trades 81.2% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 32.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.08x | 1.17x | 1.06x | 0.70x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.61 | $313.69 | $48.78 | $118.46 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.39 | $97.94 | $20.46 | $80.24 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.2% | +32.3% | +52.3% | +74.4% | +81.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.8 | 39.4 | 63.3 | 41.7 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 3.3M | 13.3M | 1.0M | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CPHC and CHDN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLUT as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", CHDN as "Buy", PENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.7% upside for FLUT (target: $206) vs 21.2% for PENN (target: $20). For income investors, CPHC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.78% vs CHDN's 0.49%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $206.13 | $36.64 | $144.84 | $20.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 48 | 23 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | — | — | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | — | — | $0.43 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.4% | +6.6% | +7.0% | +15.9% |
CHDN leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
CPHC vs FLUT vs DKNG vs CHDN vs PENN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPHC or FLUT or DKNG or CHDN or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC). Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) offers the better valuation at 16. 6x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPHC or FLUT or DKNG or CHDN or PENN?
On forward P/E, Churchill Downs Incorporated is actually cheaper at 12.
7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPHC or FLUT or DKNG or CHDN or PENN?
Over the past 5 years, Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) delivered a total return of +25.
6%, compared to -79. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHDN returned +313. 9% versus FLUT's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPHC or FLUT or DKNG or CHDN or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
08β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning PENN is approximately -1764% more volatile than CPHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Churchill Downs Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPHC or FLUT or DKNG or CHDN or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus -3. 2% for Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPHC or FLUT or DKNG or CHDN or PENN?
Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
0% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHDN leads at 25. 2% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPHC or FLUT or DKNG or CHDN or PENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) trades at 12.
7x forward P/E versus 104. 4x for DraftKings Inc. — 91. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 103. 7% to $206. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPHC or FLUT or DKNG or CHDN or PENN?
In this comparison, CPHC (1.
8% yield), CHDN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. FLUT, DKNG, PENN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CPHC or FLUT or DKNG or CHDN or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
08), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPHC: +75. 7%, PENN: +11. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPHC and FLUT and DKNG and CHDN and PENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CPHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CHDN is a small-cap deep-value stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CPHC pays a dividend while FLUT, DKNG, CHDN, PENN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.