Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CPK vs SR vs NJR vs RGCO vs SWX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
CPK vs SR vs NJR vs RGCO vs SWX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $3.05B | $5.05B | $5.60B | $246M | $6.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $586M | $2.47B | $2.21B | $107M | $2.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $75M | $358M | $341M | $14M | $464M |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 73.3% | 27.7% | 27.6% | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | 22.1% | 24.1% | 17.3% | 20.4% |
| Forward P/E | 19.5x | 16.5x | 16.4x | 18.1x | 21.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.64B | $5.24B | $3.77B | $149M | $3.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $6M | $10M | $2M | $577M |
CPK vs SR vs NJR vs RGCO vs SWX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chesapeake Utilitie… (CPK) | 100 | 140.6 | +40.6% |
| Spire Inc. (SR) | 100 | 117.3 | +17.3% |
| New Jersey Resource… (NJR) | 100 | 158.1 | +58.1% |
| RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
| Southwest Gas Holdi… (SWX) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPK vs SR vs NJR vs RGCO vs SWX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.1%, EPS growth 13.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- 18.1% revenue growth vs SWX's -62.0%
- Beta 0.04 vs RGCO's 0.65, lower leverage
- 2.0% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SR's 3.6%
SR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.6%
- PEG 0.66 vs RGCO's 12.54
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 21.3x), PEG 0.66 vs 2.67
NJR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 90.4% 10Y total return vs CPK's 133.1%
- 6.0% ROA vs CPK's 1.9%, ROIC 5.5% vs 6.3%
Among these 5 stocks, RGCO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SWX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 88.6%, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.06, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.28x
- 18.5% margin vs CPK's 12.8%
- +22.0% vs CPK's -3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.1% revenue growth vs SWX's -62.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 21.3x), PEG 0.66 vs 2.67 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.5% margin vs CPK's 12.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs RGCO's 0.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SR's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.0% vs CPK's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs CPK's 1.9%, ROIC 5.5% vs 6.3% |
CPK vs SR vs NJR vs RGCO vs SWX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CPK vs SR vs NJR vs RGCO vs SWX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SR leads in 1 of 6 categories
NJR leads 1 • SWX leads 1 • CPK leads 0 • RGCO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SR and RGCO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 23.3x RGCO's $107M. SWX is the more profitable business, keeping 18.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPK's 12.8%. On growth, RGCO holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $586M | $2.5B | $2.2B | $107M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $224M | $864M | $727M | $30M | $881M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $75M | $358M | $341M | $14M | $464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$156M | -$2.7B | -$527M | $14M | $72M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +73.3% | +27.7% | +27.6% | +33.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +22.1% | +24.1% | +17.3% | +20.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +14.5% | +15.4% | +13.0% | +18.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.6% | -108.1% | -23.9% | +12.6% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | -9.0% | +7.1% | +24.7% | -54.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +31.1% | +6.9% | +13.5% | +20.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.9x trailing earnings, SWX trades at a 30% valuation discount to CPK's 21.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SR offers better value at 0.79x vs RGCO's 12.54x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $5.1B | $5.6B | $246M | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $10.3B | $9.4B | $392M | $9.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.28x | 19.57x | 16.67x | 18.33x | 14.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.55x | 16.47x | 16.42x | 18.05x | 21.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.03x | 0.79x | 1.17x | 12.54x | 1.87x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.83x | 12.51x | 14.99x | 13.12x | 11.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.28x | 2.04x | 2.76x | 2.58x | 3.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 1.48x | 2.34x | 2.15x | 1.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 29.91x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NJR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NJR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $5 for CPK. SWX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.89x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NJR's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NJR scores 7/9 vs SR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.8% | +10.4% | +18.7% | +11.9% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +2.9% | +6.0% | +4.2% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +4.7% | +5.5% | +5.4% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +5.8% | +6.8% | +6.2% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 1.54x | 1.58x | 1.31x | 0.89x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $5.2B | $3.8B | $147M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $6M | $10M | $2M | $577M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $5.2B | $3.8B | $149M | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.65x | 2.62x | 4.32x | 3.65x | 2.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SWX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NJR five years ago would be worth $14,657 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,583 for CPK. Over the past 12 months, SWX leads with a +22.0% total return vs CPK's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SWX at 20.5% vs CPK's 2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.8% | +3.8% | +21.8% | +12.5% | +14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.2% | +16.6% | +17.6% | +16.3% | +22.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.5% | +38.7% | +21.1% | +39.4% | +74.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.8% | +32.1% | +46.6% | +28.2% | +46.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.1% | +71.4% | +90.4% | +108.5% | +67.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | +11.5% | +6.6% | +11.7% | +20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NJR and RGCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NJR is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RGCO's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RGCO currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs SR's 89.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 0.06x | -0.13x | 0.65x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $140.59 | $95.31 | $57.85 | $24.50 | $94.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $115.24 | $69.94 | $43.46 | $19.68 | $66.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.4% | +89.7% | +96.0% | +96.5% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.0 | 34.0 | 44.3 | 53.4 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 140K | 346K | 485K | 11K | 474K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CPK and SR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CPK as "Buy", SR as "Buy", NJR as "Buy", RGCO as "Buy", SWX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for SR (target: $97) vs 0.4% for NJR (target: $56). For income investors, SR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs CPK's 2.03%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $142.00 | $97.00 | $55.75 | — | $96.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 15 | 16 | 4 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +3.6% | +3.2% | +3.5% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 12 | 4 | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.58 | $3.10 | $1.79 | $0.82 | $2.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NJR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CPK vs SR vs NJR vs RGCO vs SWX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPK or SR or NJR or RGCO or SWX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is the stronger pick with 18.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -62. 0% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX). Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (21. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPK or SR or NJR or RGCO or SWX?
On trailing P/E, Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
(SWX) is the cheapest at 14. 9x versus Chesapeake Utilities Corporation at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, New Jersey Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spire Inc. wins at 0. 66x versus RGC Resources, Inc. 's 12. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPK or SR or NJR or RGCO or SWX?
Over the past 5 years, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) delivered a total return of +46.
6%, compared to +15. 8% for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPK returned +133. 1% versus SWX's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPK or SR or NJR or RGCO or SWX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
13β versus RGC Resources, Inc. 's 0. 65β — meaning RGCO is approximately -588% more volatile than NJR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 89% versus 158% for New Jersey Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPK or SR or NJR or RGCO or SWX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is pulling ahead at 18.
1% versus -62. 0% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 120. 3% year-over-year, compared to 4. 3% for Spire Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPK leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPK or SR or NJR or RGCO or SWX?
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
(SWX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus 11. 0% for Spire Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPK leads at 27. 7% versus 19. 4% for RGCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SR leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPK or SR or NJR or RGCO or SWX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spire Inc. (SR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus RGC Resources, Inc. 's 12. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 3x for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SR: 13. 4% to $97. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPK or SR or NJR or RGCO or SWX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Spire Inc. (SR) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 0% for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK).
09Is CPK or SR or NJR or RGCO or SWX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
13), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NJR: +90. 4%, RGCO: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPK and SR and NJR and RGCO and SWX?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CPK is a small-cap high-growth stock; SR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NJR is a small-cap deep-value stock; RGCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SWX is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.