Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $3.05B | $6.57B | $5.60B | $5.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $586M | $2.50B | $2.21B | $2.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $75M | $464M | $341M | $358M |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 33.7% | 27.7% | 73.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | 20.4% | 24.1% | 22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 19.5x | 21.3x | 16.4x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.64B | $3.51B | $3.77B | $5.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $577M | $10M | $6M |
CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chesapeake Utilitie… (CPK) | 100 | 140.6 | +40.6% |
| Southwest Gas Holdi… (SWX) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
| New Jersey Resource… (NJR) | 100 | 158.1 | +58.1% |
| Spire Inc. (SR) | 100 | 117.3 | +17.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.1%, EPS growth 13.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- 18.1% revenue growth vs SWX's -62.0%
- Beta 0.04 vs SR's 0.06, lower leverage
- 2.0% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SR's 3.6%
SWX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 88.6%, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.06, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.28x
- 18.5% margin vs CPK's 12.8%
- +22.0% vs CPK's -3.2%
NJR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 90.4% 10Y total return vs CPK's 133.1%
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 21.3x), PEG 1.15 vs 2.67
- 6.0% ROA vs CPK's 1.9%, ROIC 5.5% vs 6.3%
SR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.6%
- PEG 0.66 vs CPK's 2.78
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.1% revenue growth vs SWX's -62.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 21.3x), PEG 1.15 vs 2.67 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.5% margin vs CPK's 12.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs SR's 0.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SR's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.0% vs CPK's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs CPK's 1.9%, ROIC 5.5% vs 6.3% |
CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SR leads in 1 of 6 categories
SWX leads 1 • CPK leads 0 • NJR leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SWX and SR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 4.3x CPK's $586M. SWX is the more profitable business, keeping 18.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPK's 12.8%. On growth, NJR holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $586M | $2.5B | $2.2B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $224M | $881M | $727M | $864M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $75M | $464M | $341M | $358M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$156M | $72M | -$527M | -$2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +33.7% | +27.7% | +73.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +20.4% | +24.1% | +22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +18.5% | +15.4% | +14.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.6% | +2.9% | -23.9% | -108.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | -54.9% | +7.1% | -9.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +20.9% | +6.9% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.9x trailing earnings, SWX trades at a 30% valuation discount to CPK's 21.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SR offers better value at 0.79x vs CPK's 3.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $6.6B | $5.6B | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $9.5B | $9.4B | $10.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.28x | 14.93x | 16.67x | 19.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.55x | 21.30x | 16.42x | 16.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.03x | 1.87x | 1.17x | 0.79x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.83x | 11.81x | 14.99x | 12.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.28x | 3.39x | 2.76x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 1.66x | 2.34x | 1.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CPK and NJR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NJR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $5 for CPK. SWX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.89x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NJR's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWX scores 7/9 vs SR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.8% | +11.8% | +18.7% | +10.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +4.3% | +6.0% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +4.7% | +5.5% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +4.8% | +6.8% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 0.89x | 1.58x | 1.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $2.9B | $3.8B | $5.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $577M | $10M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $3.5B | $3.8B | $5.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.65x | 2.63x | 4.32x | 2.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SWX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NJR five years ago would be worth $14,657 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,583 for CPK. Over the past 12 months, SWX leads with a +22.0% total return vs CPK's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SWX at 20.5% vs CPK's 2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.8% | +14.0% | +21.8% | +3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.2% | +22.0% | +17.6% | +16.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.5% | +74.9% | +21.1% | +38.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.8% | +46.5% | +46.6% | +32.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.1% | +67.4% | +90.4% | +71.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | +20.5% | +6.6% | +11.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SWX and NJR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NJR is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SR's 0.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SWX currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs SR's 89.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 0.06x | -0.13x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $140.59 | $94.42 | $57.85 | $95.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $115.24 | $66.93 | $43.46 | $69.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.4% | +96.1% | +96.0% | +89.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.0 | 50.6 | 44.3 | 34.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 140K | 474K | 485K | 346K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CPK and SR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CPK as "Buy", SWX as "Buy", NJR as "Buy", SR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for SR (target: $97) vs 0.4% for NJR (target: $56). For income investors, SR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs CPK's 2.03%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $142.00 | $96.00 | $55.75 | $97.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 13 | 16 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.7% | +3.2% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.58 | $2.47 | $1.79 | $3.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SWX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPK or SWX or NJR or SR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is the stronger pick with 18.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -62. 0% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX). Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (21. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPK or SWX or NJR or SR?
On trailing P/E, Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
(SWX) is the cheapest at 14. 9x versus Chesapeake Utilities Corporation at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, New Jersey Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spire Inc. wins at 0. 66x versus Chesapeake Utilities Corporation's 2. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPK or SWX or NJR or SR?
Over the past 5 years, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) delivered a total return of +46.
6%, compared to +15. 8% for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPK returned +133. 1% versus SWX's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPK or SWX or NJR or SR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
13β versus Spire Inc. 's 0. 06β — meaning SR is approximately -149% more volatile than NJR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 89% versus 158% for New Jersey Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPK or SWX or NJR or SR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is pulling ahead at 18.
1% versus -62. 0% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 120. 3% year-over-year, compared to 4. 3% for Spire Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPK leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPK or SWX or NJR or SR?
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
(SWX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus 11. 0% for Spire Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPK leads at 27. 7% versus 21. 2% for SR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SR leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPK or SWX or NJR or SR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spire Inc. (SR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus Chesapeake Utilities Corporation's 2. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 3x for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SR: 13. 4% to $97. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPK or SWX or NJR or SR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Spire Inc. (SR) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 0% for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK).
09Is CPK or SWX or NJR or SR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
13), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NJR: +90. 4%, SR: +71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPK and SWX and NJR and SR?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CPK is a small-cap high-growth stock; SWX is a small-cap deep-value stock; NJR is a small-cap deep-value stock; SR is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.