Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR vs NFG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Oil & Gas Integrated
CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR vs NFG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $3.05B | $6.57B | $5.60B | $5.05B | $7.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $586M | $2.50B | $2.21B | $2.47B | $2.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $75M | $464M | $341M | $358M | $686M |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 33.7% | 27.7% | 73.3% | 50.0% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | 20.4% | 24.1% | 22.1% | 41.4% |
| Forward P/E | 19.5x | 21.3x | 16.4x | 16.5x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.64B | $3.51B | $3.77B | $5.24B | $2.83B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $577M | $10M | $6M | $43M |
CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR vs NFG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chesapeake Utilitie… (CPK) | 100 | 140.6 | +40.6% |
| Southwest Gas Holdi… (SWX) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
| New Jersey Resource… (NJR) | 100 | 158.1 | +58.1% |
| Spire Inc. (SR) | 100 | 117.3 | +17.3% |
| National Fuel Gas C… (NFG) | 100 | 191.1 | +91.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR vs NFG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.1%, EPS growth 13.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- 18.1% revenue growth vs SWX's -62.0%
- Beta 0.04 vs SR's 0.06, lower leverage
SWX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 88.6%, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.06, yield 2.7%, current ratio 1.28x
- +22.0% vs CPK's -3.2%
NJR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 90.4% 10Y total return vs NFG's 82.4%
SR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.6%
- PEG 0.66 vs CPK's 2.78
- PEG 0.66 vs 1.15
- 3.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs NFG's 2.6%
NFG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 27.5% margin vs CPK's 12.8%
- 7.7% ROA vs CPK's 1.9%, ROIC 10.6% vs 6.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.1% revenue growth vs SWX's -62.0% | |
| Value | PEG 0.66 vs 1.15 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.5% margin vs CPK's 12.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs SR's 0.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs NFG's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.0% vs CPK's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.7% ROA vs CPK's 1.9%, ROIC 10.6% vs 6.3% |
CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR vs NFG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR vs NFG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFG leads in 2 of 6 categories
SWX leads 1 • CPK leads 0 • NJR leads 0 • SR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 4.3x CPK's $586M. NFG is the more profitable business, keeping 27.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPK's 12.8%. On growth, NFG holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $586M | $2.5B | $2.2B | $2.5B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $224M | $881M | $727M | $864M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $75M | $464M | $341M | $358M | $686M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$156M | $72M | -$527M | -$2.7B | $307M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +33.7% | +27.7% | +73.3% | +50.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +20.4% | +24.1% | +22.1% | +41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +18.5% | +15.4% | +14.5% | +27.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.6% | +2.9% | -23.9% | -108.1% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | -54.9% | +7.1% | -9.0% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +20.9% | +6.9% | +31.1% | +9.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SR and NFG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, NFG trades at a 34% valuation discount to CPK's 21.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SR offers better value at 0.79x vs CPK's 3.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $6.6B | $5.6B | $5.1B | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $9.5B | $9.4B | $10.3B | $10.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.28x | 14.93x | 16.67x | 19.57x | 14.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.55x | 21.30x | 16.42x | 16.47x | 10.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.03x | 1.87x | 1.17x | 0.79x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.83x | 11.81x | 14.99x | 12.51x | 8.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.28x | 3.39x | 2.76x | 2.04x | 3.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 1.66x | 2.34x | 1.48x | 2.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 40.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFG delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $5 for CPK. SWX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.89x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NJR's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFG scores 9/9 vs SR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.8% | +11.8% | +18.7% | +10.4% | +20.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +4.3% | +6.0% | +2.9% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +4.7% | +5.5% | +4.7% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +4.8% | +6.8% | +5.8% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 0.89x | 1.58x | 1.54x | 0.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $2.9B | $3.8B | $5.2B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $577M | $10M | $6M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $3.5B | $3.8B | $5.2B | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.65x | 2.63x | 4.32x | 2.62x | 7.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SWX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFG five years ago would be worth $17,136 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,583 for CPK. Over the past 12 months, SWX leads with a +22.0% total return vs CPK's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SWX at 20.5% vs CPK's 2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.8% | +14.0% | +21.8% | +3.8% | -1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.2% | +22.0% | +17.6% | +16.6% | -0.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.5% | +74.9% | +21.1% | +38.7% | +61.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.8% | +46.5% | +46.6% | +32.1% | +71.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.1% | +67.4% | +90.4% | +71.4% | +82.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | +20.5% | +6.6% | +11.5% | +17.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SWX and NJR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NJR is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SR's 0.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SWX currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs NFG's 82.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 0.06x | -0.13x | 0.06x | -0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $140.59 | $94.42 | $57.85 | $95.31 | $97.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $115.24 | $66.93 | $43.46 | $69.94 | $77.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.4% | +96.1% | +96.0% | +89.7% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.0 | 50.6 | 44.3 | 34.0 | 26.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 140K | 474K | 485K | 346K | 762K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SR and NFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CPK as "Buy", SWX as "Buy", NJR as "Buy", SR as "Buy", NFG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.9% upside for NFG (target: $101) vs 0.4% for NJR (target: $56). For income investors, SR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs CPK's 2.03%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $142.00 | $96.00 | $55.75 | $97.00 | $101.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 13 | 16 | 15 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.7% | +3.2% | +3.6% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.58 | $2.47 | $1.79 | $3.10 | $2.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
NFG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SWX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
CPK vs SWX vs NJR vs SR vs NFG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPK or SWX or NJR or SR or NFG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is the stronger pick with 18.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -62. 0% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX). National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPK or SWX or NJR or SR or NFG?
On trailing P/E, National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) is the cheapest at 14.
1x versus Chesapeake Utilities Corporation at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, National Fuel Gas Company is actually cheaper at 10. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spire Inc. wins at 0. 66x versus Chesapeake Utilities Corporation's 2. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPK or SWX or NJR or SR or NFG?
Over the past 5 years, National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) delivered a total return of +71.
4%, compared to +15. 8% for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPK returned +133. 1% versus SWX's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPK or SWX or NJR or SR or NFG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
13β versus Spire Inc. 's 0. 06β — meaning SR is approximately -149% more volatile than NJR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 89% versus 158% for New Jersey Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPK or SWX or NJR or SR or NFG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is pulling ahead at 18.
1% versus -62. 0% for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. (SWX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Fuel Gas Company grew EPS 576. 2% year-over-year, compared to 4. 3% for Spire Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPK leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPK or SWX or NJR or SR or NFG?
National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
8% net margin versus 11. 0% for Spire Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFG leads at 35. 7% versus 21. 2% for SR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SR leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPK or SWX or NJR or SR or NFG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spire Inc. (SR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus Chesapeake Utilities Corporation's 2. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 21. 3x for Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. — 11. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFG: 25. 9% to $101. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPK or SWX or NJR or SR or NFG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Spire Inc. (SR) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 0% for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK).
09Is CPK or SWX or NJR or SR or NFG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
13), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NJR: +90. 4%, SR: +71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPK and SWX and NJR and SR and NFG?
These companies operate in different sectors (CPK (Utilities) and SWX (Utilities) and NJR (Utilities) and SR (Utilities) and NFG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CPK is a small-cap high-growth stock; SWX is a small-cap deep-value stock; NJR is a small-cap deep-value stock; SR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NFG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.