Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CPOP vs DOYU vs HUYA vs MOMO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
CPOP vs DOYU vs HUYA vs MOMO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $901K | $142M | $481M | $2.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $96M | $4.20B | $6.11B | $10.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-29M | $-202M | $-153M | $800M |
| Gross Margin | 3.4% | 9.2% | 12.7% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | -26.5% | -7.1% | -3.4% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.3x | 4.0x | 1.1x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $16M | $49M | $129M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $231K | $1.02B | $1.19B | $5.44B |
CPOP vs DOYU vs HUYA vs MOMO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pop Culture Group C… (CPOP) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| DouYu International… (DOYU) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 18.1 | -81.9% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPOP vs DOYU vs HUYA vs MOMO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 155.5%, EPS growth -327.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.9%
- 155.5% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8%
DOYU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 100.0%
- 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HUYA's 56.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
HUYA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +26.9% vs CPOP's -42.5%
MOMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -9.4% 10Y total return vs HUYA's -60.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 4.68x
- Beta 0.78, yield 4.6%, current ratio 4.68x
- Lower P/E (1.1x vs 4.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 155.5% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 4.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs CPOP's -30.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs HUYA's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HUYA's 56.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.9% vs CPOP's -42.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs CPOP's -30.0%, ROIC 10.9% vs -40.9% |
CPOP vs DOYU vs HUYA vs MOMO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CPOP vs DOYU vs HUYA vs MOMO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MOMO leads in 3 of 6 categories
CPOP leads 1 • DOYU leads 1 • HUYA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOMO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.3B annually — 106.6x CPOP's $96M. MOMO is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPOP's -30.6%. On growth, CPOP holds the edge at +74.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $96M | $4.2B | $6.1B | $10.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | -$275M | -$120M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$29M | -$202M | -$153M | $800M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $0 | $0 | $685M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +9.2% | +12.7% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.5% | -7.1% | -3.4% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.6% | -4.8% | -2.5% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -5.9% | -1.9% | +6.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +74.2% | +2.1% | +1.7% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +121.6% | +179.1% | -118.5% | +32.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CPOP leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $901,212 | $142M | $481M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | -$5M | $314M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.07x | -3.31x | -103.70x | 9.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.28x | 3.97x | 1.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 6.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.23x | 0.54x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 0.23x | 0.67x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 21.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-102 for CPOP. DOYU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPOP's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUYA scores 7/9 vs DOYU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -102.2% | -6.5% | -2.4% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.0% | -4.7% | -1.7% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.9% | -15.4% | -1.7% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.3% | -10.3% | -2.1% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$1.0B | -$1.1B | -$5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $230,563 | $1.0B | $1.2B | $5.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $16M | $49M | $129M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -77.74x | — | — | 18.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DOYU and HUYA and MOMO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth $6,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10 for CPOP. Over the past 12 months, HUYA leads with a +26.9% total return vs CPOP's -42.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOYU at 31.1% vs CPOP's -64.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.4% | -31.8% | +5.6% | +1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.5% | -34.2% | +26.9% | +16.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.5% | +125.5% | +99.7% | -5.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -71.6% | -60.8% | -36.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -78.8% | -60.1% | -9.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -64.3% | +31.1% | +25.9% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MOMO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOMO is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUYA's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOMO currently trades 68.8% from its 52-week high vs CPOP's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.10x | 1.17x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.61 | $9.34 | $4.93 | $9.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.28 | $4.28 | $2.21 | $5.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.0% | +50.3% | +64.9% | +68.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 47.0 | 54.2 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 130K | 26K | 1.0M | 648K |
Analyst Outlook
DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DOYU as "Hold", HUYA as "Buy", MOMO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 92.1% upside for DOYU (target: $9) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, DOYU offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MOMO's 4.61%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.03 | $3.45 | $8.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 15 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% | +56.7% | +4.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $68.16 | $12.34 | $1.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.9% | +7.6% | +5.1% |
MOMO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CPOP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CPOP vs DOYU vs HUYA vs MOMO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPOP or DOYU or HUYA or MOMO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pop Culture Group Co.
, Ltd (CPOP) is the stronger pick with 155. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (1. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HUYA Inc. (HUYA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPOP or DOYU or HUYA or MOMO?
On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc.
is actually cheaper at 1. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPOP or DOYU or HUYA or MOMO?
Over the past 5 years, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) delivered a total return of -36. 7%, compared to -99. 9% for Pop Culture Group Co. , Ltd (CPOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOMO returned -9. 4% versus CPOP's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPOP or DOYU or HUYA or MOMO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus HUYA Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning HUYA is approximately 50% more volatile than MOMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 41% for Pop Culture Group Co. , Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPOP or DOYU or HUYA or MOMO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pop Culture Group Co.
, Ltd (CPOP) is pulling ahead at 155. 5% versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HUYA Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -969. 4% for DouYu International Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPOP leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPOP or DOYU or HUYA or MOMO?
Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus -26. 2% for Pop Culture Group Co. , Ltd — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 12. 7% versus -28. 8% for CPOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MOMO leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPOP or DOYU or HUYA or MOMO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) trades at 1. 1x forward P/E versus 4. 3x for DouYu International Holdings Limited — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOYU: 92. 1% to $9. 03.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPOP or DOYU or HUYA or MOMO?
In this comparison, DOYU (100.
0% yield), HUYA (56. 7% yield), MOMO (4. 6% yield) pay a dividend. CPOP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CPOP or DOYU or HUYA or MOMO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 4. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9. 4%, CPOP: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPOP and DOYU and HUYA and MOMO?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CPOP is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOYU is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock. DOYU, HUYA, MOMO pay a dividend while CPOP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.