Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CPRX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
CPRX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $3.82B | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $589M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $214M | $-168M | $153M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 85.2% | — | 65.4% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | — | 12.3% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | — | 24.8x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $22M | $70M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $709M | $194M | $1.12B | $1.98B |
CPRX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catalyst Pharmaceut… (CPRX) | 100 | 723.1 | +623.1% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 216.4 | +116.4% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPRX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth 28.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.1%
- 48.0% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 6.08x
- Beta 0.88, current ratio 6.08x
DBVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +110.4% vs ALKS's +16.5%
ALKS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
- PEG 0.35 vs CPRX's 0.88
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.4% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs IQV's 1.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs ALKS's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
CPRX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CPRX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CPRX leads in 3 of 6 categories
IQV leads 2 • DBVT leads 0 • ALKS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. CPRX is the more profitable business, keeping 36.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IQV's 8.3%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $589M | $0 | $1.6B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $295M | -$112M | $212M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $214M | -$168M | $153M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $209M | -$151M | $392M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.2% | — | +65.4% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | — | +12.3% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +36.4% | — | +9.8% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | — | +25.1% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.6% | — | +28.2% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.1% | +91.5% | -4.1% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.6x trailing earnings, CPRX trades at a 25% valuation discount to ALKS's 24.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs CPRX's 0.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.55x | -0.76x | 24.76x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.58x | — | — | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.99x | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.54x | — | 17.25x | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.48x | — | 4.00x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.16x | 0.66x | 3.28x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.30x | — | 12.28x | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRX delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. CPRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs IQV's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.5% | -130.2% | +8.8% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.4% | -89.0% | +5.4% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +83.9% | — | +18.9% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +30.6% | -145.7% | +14.2% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$707M | -$172M | -$1.0B | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $709M | $194M | $1.1B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $22M | $70M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | 32.30x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CPRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CPRX five years ago would be worth $64,524 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,090 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs ALKS's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CPRX at 21.5% vs IQV's -2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.6% | +4.9% | +25.3% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.8% | +110.4% | +16.5% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.4% | +19.7% | +14.5% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +545.2% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4800.2% | -87.0% | -11.0% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.5% | +6.2% | +4.6% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CPRX and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IQV's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs IQV's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.56 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.05 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.3 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 252K | 2.3M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CPRX as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 5.9% for CPRX (target: $33).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.00 | $46.33 | $44.00 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 15 | 28 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +4.1% |
CPRX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CPRX vs DBVT vs ALKS vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPRX or DBVT or ALKS or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CPRX) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CPRX) offers the better valuation at 18. 6x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CPRX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPRX or DBVT or ALKS or IQV?
On trailing P/E, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CPRX) is the cheapest at 18. 6x versus Alkermes plc at 24. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 0. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPRX or DBVT or ALKS or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CPRX) delivered a total return of +545. 2%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPRX returned +48. 0% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPRX or DBVT or ALKS or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CPRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 88β versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning IQV is approximately 51% more volatile than CPRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CPRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPRX or DBVT or ALKS or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CPRX) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 28. 2% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPRX leads at 40. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPRX or DBVT or ALKS or IQV?
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CPRX) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 36. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPRX leads at 43. 8% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPRX or DBVT or ALKS or IQV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 0. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 6x for Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPRX or DBVT or ALKS or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CPRX or DBVT or ALKS or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CPRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPRX: +48. 0%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPRX and DBVT and ALKS and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.